User talk:Yanga Veracruz
Yanga Veracruz, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Yanga Veracruz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC) |
A belated welcome![edit]
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Yanga Veracruz! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! clickHereToGoToMyUserPage (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021[edit]
Hello, I'm Such-change47. I noticed that you recently removed content from Afro-Mexicans without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you wish to remove such a large amount of text, I recommend you use the talk page instead and discuss your changes. To remove such a large amount of text at once looks like blanking and is not constructive. Such-change47 (talk) 00:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Such-change47Not sure if you are a bot or a real editor but I explained why I deleted the sub section with an extensive edit summary. It is entirely based on blogs which don´t meet WP:RS and include largely erroneous, anecdotal or inane content which does not add value. Kindly self-revert. It is a bad habit to revert editors impulsively without taking time to examine the merits of the rationale provided in the edit summary. Thank you. Yanga Veracruz (talk) 00:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Such-change47 I also notice you have reverted all of my edits, all of which include extensive edit summaries and policy justifications. Is there any reason for such an aggressive move? Following AGF I´ll assume it was an honest mistake by a slightly trigger happy wikipedian. Let me know, so I can continue my editing. Yanga Veracruz (talk) 00:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Yanga Veracruz, I reverted your edit because you removed a large amount of text without much justification. I am a relatively new editor, so perhaps I got things wrong. BilCat is highly experienced and appears to have been checking some of my edits. @BilCat:, please may I have your opinion? Also ToBeFree if you could advise?Such-change47 (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Such-change47 I noticed you were relatively unfamiliar with wikipedia since my justifications were abnormally extensive for your average editor. Don´t worry, we all make mistakes. You see the stuff I was deleting was according to a Wikipedia policy known as WP:RS which requires article content to be reliable. Wikipedia articles need to be sourced and , in matters related to, for example, the colonial history of Afro-Mexicans, we cannot use sources such as Blogs or articles by people who are not academically qualified to hold a reliable opinion on the matter. Maybe user:BilCat can explain it better than I can. My objective in this article is to slowly substitute unreliable sources for reliable academic ones. Once you are satisfied with my explanation and with BilCat´s confirmation, I would appreciate a self-revert. Thank you! Yanga Veracruz (talk) 00:35, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Such-change47 I never heard back from you. Do you still disagree with my edits you rolled back? If so, drop me a message on the talk page of Afro-Mexicans so we can discuss. Otherwise, I would appreciate a self-revert since I don`t like to revert other editors. Thanks!Yanga Veracruz (talk) 22:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Such-change47 I noticed you were relatively unfamiliar with wikipedia since my justifications were abnormally extensive for your average editor. Don´t worry, we all make mistakes. You see the stuff I was deleting was according to a Wikipedia policy known as WP:RS which requires article content to be reliable. Wikipedia articles need to be sourced and , in matters related to, for example, the colonial history of Afro-Mexicans, we cannot use sources such as Blogs or articles by people who are not academically qualified to hold a reliable opinion on the matter. Maybe user:BilCat can explain it better than I can. My objective in this article is to slowly substitute unreliable sources for reliable academic ones. Once you are satisfied with my explanation and with BilCat´s confirmation, I would appreciate a self-revert. Thank you! Yanga Veracruz (talk) 00:35, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Yanga Veracruz, I reverted your edit because you removed a large amount of text without much justification. I am a relatively new editor, so perhaps I got things wrong. BilCat is highly experienced and appears to have been checking some of my edits. @BilCat:, please may I have your opinion? Also ToBeFree if you could advise?Such-change47 (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Such-change47 I also notice you have reverted all of my edits, all of which include extensive edit summaries and policy justifications. Is there any reason for such an aggressive move? Following AGF I´ll assume it was an honest mistake by a slightly trigger happy wikipedian. Let me know, so I can continue my editing. Yanga Veracruz (talk) 00:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 12:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)