User talk:Word0151

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Word0151! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 13:53, Saturday, March 25, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Word0151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The indefinite block doesn't make sense. I wrongly decided to revert the edits in some pages without prior discussion, which though damnable, i think i have endured enough punishment and should be unblocked now. Those reverts don't make all of my edits, and i have made some good edits to pages like Sansho the Bailiff, Hindi etc. I can assure you that since i have let my non-civil and edit-waring behaviour, i won't prove to be obstructive and can make some constructive edits.

Decline reason:

You seem to have been reverting a lot including on the Hindi article you mention. In your next unblock request you should say what constructive edits you want to make. PhilKnight (talk) 17:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Word0151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First the edits i would like to make after unblock- Dingal is whole lotta nonsense(i can't even verify the citations), Adding more information in Sergey Nechayev particularly from [1], In articles of Tchaikovsky' Symphonies the section name should be changed from Criticism to Reception, non-existent film articles like Oyuki the Virgin, an article on musical instrument Turahi, adding photograph of Lawrence Bishnoi and M. Jaishankar, Adding use of Violin in Indian Classical, but initial i would like to make small edits like changing image in Tatsuya Nakadai to when he was younger, adding photograph in Shima Iwashita etc. I won't try to make any contentious edits against current scholarly view or the non-disputable general consensus of editors, as i realize this causes unnecessary waste of everyone's time.

And my reverts on Hindi were neither bad edits, you can check the talk page, and after an administrator told me not to revert i stopped and first discussed about the edits. I have also created two articles on rarities: Lala Ram Saran Das Talwar, Jagat Singh Binjal. I also edit on English Wiktionary where i was blocked for a week for vandalizing pages, they didn't blocked me indefinitely because i was useful to the project(i created the entry किरच which was a featured word the day). I think i deserve a second chance.

Decline reason:

A month ago you asked for this page to be deleted and to be able to vanish; what's changed to make you now want to edit? Even if you avoid the areas where you have edit warred previously, disputes are inevitable and I'm not convinced you can handle those without edit warring. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@PhilKnight @ToBeFree Can you please review my unblock request. Sorry if it feels importuning. Word0151 (talk) 05:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not interested in unblocking a user whose edit warring in multiple articles seems to indicate incompatibility with WP:CHILDPROTECT. Blocking you for edit warring was just the easiest way to deal with the problem. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: Such accusations are really outrageous, if only you could write constructively where i was pushing any such agenda. I can give me reasons:

The schrondinger article was too biased relying on those third grade news articles and making him seen as some evil. Will you ban that user too for making this edit

In the pederasty, i wanted it to be historically based( Nietzsche says in aphorism 101 of his human all to human book - Care must be taken, in the contemplation of earlier ages, that there be no falling into unjust scornfulness). I was not removing the modern view, it is just more than half of the articles's beginning focused excessively on that only!.

I have made similar edits which don't involve any children. Word0151 (talk) 11:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Umblock request[edit]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Word0151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Firstly, yes i agree i wanted all my user pages to be deleted, but it was not for leaving wikimedia completely, just that i didn't like the pages and for same reasons i have them deleted on Wiktionary. I didn't suddenly decide to get active on wikipedia, i was just inactive(only making minor edits) on wikimedia as a whole due to exams for a month, and they are over so i am back to editing. Secondly, Yes i agree disputes are inevitable, sometime me and sometimes any other user can find problem with a particular edit. I accept that so far i relied mostly on edit summaries instead of discussing peacefully on the talk page. But i also assure that that if a user finds wrong in my edit, i shall discuss and will abide by the consensus reached with fellow editors. I don't really know how can i convince that i won't editwar again, but even on Whiplash where i behaved very childishly, after some reverts i agreed to discuss, and the consensus was reached that my edit was not preferred, i complied to it without reverting again. The reason for my incivility was sullenness only. I should be given atleast a second chance, so that i may convince better perhaps. Thank you very much. _{{By the way, i reverted many a edits on Wiktionary just a day before, but it was because the the editor was a vandal who didn't even know the language correctly, so i hope it doesn't influence the reviewer's decision if he chooses to look up my edits on other platforms, still Wiktionary≠Wikipedia}}

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Firstly, yes i agree i wanted all my user pages to be deleted, but it was not for leaving wikimedia completely, just that i didn't like the pages and for same reasons i have them deleted on Wiktionary. I didn't suddenly decide to get active on wikipedia, i was just inactive(only making minor edits) on wikimedia as a whole due to exams for a month, and they are over so i am back to editing.                                                       
Secondly, Yes i agree disputes are inevitable, sometime me and sometimes any other user can find problem with a particular edit. I accept that so far i relied mostly on edit summaries instead of discussing peacefully on the talk page. But i also assure that that if a user finds wrong in my edit, i shall discuss and will abide by the consensus reached with fellow editors. I don't really know how can i convince that i won't editwar again, but even on [[Whiplash]] where i behaved very childishly, after some reverts i agreed to discuss, and the consensus was reached that my edit was not preferred, i complied to it without reverting again. The reason for my incivility was sullenness only. I should be given atleast a second chance, so that i may convince better perhaps. Thank you very much. <sub>{By the way, i reverted many a edits on Wiktionary just a day before, but it was because the the editor was a vandal who didn't even know the language correctly, so i hope it doesn't influence the reviewer's decision if he chooses to look up my edits on other platforms, still Wiktionary≠Wikipedia} </sub> |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Firstly, yes i agree i wanted all my user pages to be deleted, but it was not for leaving wikimedia completely, just that i didn't like the pages and for same reasons i have them deleted on Wiktionary. I didn't suddenly decide to get active on wikipedia, i was just inactive(only making minor edits) on wikimedia as a whole due to exams for a month, and they are over so i am back to editing.                                                       
Secondly, Yes i agree disputes are inevitable, sometime me and sometimes any other user can find problem with a particular edit. I accept that so far i relied mostly on edit summaries instead of discussing peacefully on the talk page. But i also assure that that if a user finds wrong in my edit, i shall discuss and will abide by the consensus reached with fellow editors. I don't really know how can i convince that i won't editwar again, but even on [[Whiplash]] where i behaved very childishly, after some reverts i agreed to discuss, and the consensus was reached that my edit was not preferred, i complied to it without reverting again. The reason for my incivility was sullenness only. I should be given atleast a second chance, so that i may convince better perhaps. Thank you very much. <sub>{By the way, i reverted many a edits on Wiktionary just a day before, but it was because the the editor was a vandal who didn't even know the language correctly, so i hope it doesn't influence the reviewer's decision if he chooses to look up my edits on other platforms, still Wiktionary≠Wikipedia} </sub> |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Firstly, yes i agree i wanted all my user pages to be deleted, but it was not for leaving wikimedia completely, just that i didn't like the pages and for same reasons i have them deleted on Wiktionary. I didn't suddenly decide to get active on wikipedia, i was just inactive(only making minor edits) on wikimedia as a whole due to exams for a month, and they are over so i am back to editing.                                                       
Secondly, Yes i agree disputes are inevitable, sometime me and sometimes any other user can find problem with a particular edit. I accept that so far i relied mostly on edit summaries instead of discussing peacefully on the talk page. But i also assure that that if a user finds wrong in my edit, i shall discuss and will abide by the consensus reached with fellow editors. I don't really know how can i convince that i won't editwar again, but even on [[Whiplash]] where i behaved very childishly, after some reverts i agreed to discuss, and the consensus was reached that my edit was not preferred, i complied to it without reverting again. The reason for my incivility was sullenness only. I should be given atleast a second chance, so that i may convince better perhaps. Thank you very much. <sub>{By the way, i reverted many a edits on Wiktionary just a day before, but it was because the the editor was a vandal who didn't even know the language correctly, so i hope it doesn't influence the reviewer's decision if he chooses to look up my edits on other platforms, still Wiktionary≠Wikipedia} </sub> |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}