User talk:William MI6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, William MI6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 06:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Institute for Public Policy and Good Governance[edit]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. William MI6, thanks for creating Institute for Public Policy and Good Governance!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 2

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 21:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Institute for Public Policy and Good Governance, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 10:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Institute for Public Policy and Good Governance logo.jpg.pdf listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Institute for Public Policy and Good Governance logo.jpg.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 21:27, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MacroGeo[edit]

The article MacroGeo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for this independent research provider.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 04:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MacroGeo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MacroGeo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacroGeo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 13:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brunello Rosa for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brunello Rosa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brunello Rosa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ms4263nyu (talk) 08:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]