User talk:Wikimeeeeeee

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wikimeeeeeee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! PhilKnight (talk) 00:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susan Stamper Brown[edit]

The article Susan Stamper Brown has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject appears to fail the criteria at the relevant notability guideline, WP:JOURNALIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VQuakr (talk) 04:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Susan Stamper Brown for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susan Stamper Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Stamper Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VQuakr (talk) 21:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your recent edits at this AfD, you may find it helpful to read through the advice at WP:DISCUSSAFD, the definition of "notability" as used on Wikipedia at WP:N, and the help page at WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE. Kind regards! VQuakr (talk) 01:58, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Point well taken. Nonetheless, it is wise to consider that WP loses credibility if bias (left or right wing) influences deletion decisions. Wikimeeeeeee (talk) 19:03, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed; neutrality is one of our core values. Which is why we base our criteria for inclusion of articles on objective standards such as notability rather than political affiliation. VQuakr (talk) 19:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your recent edits to the deletion discussion; the discussion has been closed and shouldn't be modified. VQuakr (talk) 04:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]