User talk:Wickelodeon

March 2022[edit]

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. Namely, lacking the competence required to effectively communicate in English, on the English Wikipedia, while making contested changes that are undiscussed or poorly-explained. If by chance, with enough proofreading, you are able to coherently communicate in English, that is something you'll need to convince the reviewing admin, if you were to appeal this block (instructions attached). But that's just the first step. The next step would be to commit to discussing and explaining contested changes in a measured and collegial way, with an emphasis placed on citing reliable sources. Thanks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 11:36, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request 1[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wickelodeon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I got warning by this morning and i said i will pay attention to your concerns and did nothing wrong again. In article of Seljuks 4/5 sources says otherwise but my edits with a lot of arguments reverted over and over again. And about my english yes it isn't at native level but enough for Wikipedia level. Also reason of complain wasn't even english level. And it's not a reason for indefinite banning. And sorry for my bad england part was meme dude are you serious?Wickelodeon (talk) 11:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm afraid nothing here convinces me to lift the block. Yamla (talk) 12:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You said that calling your English incoherent was "harsh," and then you apologized for your bad English, but you misspelled the words as "bed england" (diff). Was that meant as a joke? El_C 11:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: sorry i must more explanatory in my jokes. Wickelodeon (talk) 12:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That link doesn't work. I guess I missed that meme. In any case, your unblock request is rather incoherent itself. Also, please use normal capitalization and punctuation. English is not my native tongue, either, and seeing lower case "i," for example, disrupts the flow for me. So please try to write more conventionally. This isn't a chat room. El_C 12:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okey, i will be more careful when i write sentences. And better link here - [1]Wickelodeon (talk) 12:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously you won't, since you continue to use lower case "i" even as you promise not to do it. Wow. El_C 12:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

lacking the competence required to effectively communicate in English It's the reason of ban not the usage of "i"s instead of "I". But as I said for your request, I will be more careful about my wording. And if it will not be a special question what was your mother tongue? Wickelodeon (talk) 12:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrew. Anyway, I look at the passage quoted at ANI, and I'm just baffled. To recall, it reads (in part): But no, they funded by Turko-Persian goverment unlike our glorious Iranian storytelle.. historians (diff). I was also especially concerned to see you dismiss substantive objections with (again, barely coherent English): So when we read that your complain about article, you just don't like it. WP:JDLI (diff).

Then, you go on to repeatedly edit war to remove the word "silly," which for some reason you decide is a personal attack (that, in itself, is silly). And even in your above unblock request you write: In article of Seljuks 4/5 sources says otherwise but my edits with a lot of arguments reverted over and over again. "Otherwise" to what? As for "reverted over and over again," you did as well, so what about you? In closing, there's too many problems and you've proven too challenging to collaborate with on this language project, I'm sorry. El_C 13:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: So what is your suggestion to me. What can I do for lifting ban. Waiting new unblock request for a month? Or a promise to not doing unsourced or unexplained edition? Also thanks for your time. Wickelodeon (talk) 13:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestions are outlined in the original block notice. El_C 13:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request 2[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wickelodeon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Yamla: concerns about me at that block was my english -misunderstanding by admin-proficiency and communicate problems. I said I will be more official -like here to build an encyclopedia- and leave forum wording. I didn't warned for my english even once, and anyone didn't even wait for I fix that problems. At least give me topic ban or something else, banning for a misunderstanding joke is okey but unlifting for what? I get your concerns about me and I will work about it so much, as I doing even when I writing these words. But if I wouldn't get a chance for fix my faults, how can I fix them. Wickelodeon (talk) 12:30, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request is difficult to read; I concur that you don't yet have the English skills needed to adequately participate here. You are free to participate in the version of Wikipedia in your primary language, and once you have improved your English skills, return here and request unblock at that time. I cannot unblock you now, however. 331dot (talk) 10:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

תראה? @El C: Wickelodeon (talk) 21:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:35, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]