User talk:Welsh/Archives/2012/June
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Assessment of UK Rail articles
Hi Welsh, I see you are very busy adding assessments to railway articles, which is great for the UK. However, I would like to make one comment. Many of the the Scottish articles already had/have a WPTIS (WikiProject Transport in Scotland) rating (I added many thousands of WPTIS and UK rail assessments over the last few years), other articles use the Trains WikiProject with the "Scotland flag" e.g. {{TrainsWikiProject}}. That one was taken from Talk:Stobcross Railway, which I had already assessed for WPTIS and which you have also just assessed. However, by adding a Scotland=yes flag but no Scotland-importance=low flag, you have added an unknown-importance Scotland status to the existing Low-importance Scotland status and the former overwrites that latter. (See the trail that you are leaving at Scotland Transport [1] its almost a mirror image of the one at UK Railways articles by quality log at [2], but its a log of removed assessments not added assessments).
In Short, if any Trains article already as a WPTIS assessment it does not need an additional "|scotland=yes |Scotland-importance=" flags. Thanks. Pyrotec (talk) 22:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I see what you mean, I didn't realise it worked like that. welsh (talk) 22:06, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Welsh, the log [3] shows more WPTIS importance ratings being removed. I've restored some assessments, but I might start reverting. Pyrotec (talk) 16:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)