User talk:WEISHEIPL

Notability of The Chokers[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Chokers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 01:45, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but bands have to be extremely notable for inclusion. Also, please don't remove deletion tags. See WP:BAND to learn what constitutes notability. I wish you luck on your project. Personally, I'd rather see kids getting involved in a project like yours instead of turning to Jello in front of Halo 3 all day long. :) Regards, --PMDrive1061 02:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Daren Wingert has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 16:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Michaels123.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Michaels123.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CIMG0420-2005.05.29-16.06.01.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CIMG0420-2005.05.29-16.06.01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Millville, Minnesota, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Millville, Minnesota was changed by WEISHEIPL (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-04-09T13:40:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Millville, Minnesota. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 13:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Millville, Minnesota. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 13:46, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]