User talk:Vaselineeeeeeee/Archive 17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10 ← Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18

2019–20 Juventus F.C. season

I love when people try to tell me how things have been done on Italian football season articles for years when I’ve been doing them for ten years and know for a fact that they were never done that way. Italia2006 (talk) 21:39, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

@Italia2006: Hey. The reason for his introducing a bunch of random spaces I don't know, but they're obviously not needed, but the part of the edit with regards to overlinking is fine and why do you not also think Perin, Mandzukic and Kwang-song don't belong in "Players transferred out during the season"? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Let me clarify. I don't believe Mandzukic et al belong in the appearances and goals section when they've produced neither, we usually put them at the end of the "squad information" table under the heading "Players transferred during the season". I don't care about the overlinking, but I definitely care about the spaces because they make no sense and I object to someone trying to claim that that's the way it's always been done when that's clearly not the case. Italia2006 (talk) 22:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
@Italia2006: That seems reasonable to me. Remove from the disciplinary record too on that basis. I see there are still a couple players listed in "Appearances and goals" with neither, but realize there is still time for them to do so, but by the end of the season if they still have none they should also be removed on that precedent, or just have them removed until they do so? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Leave till the end of the season, then if they've made neither we remove. Italia2006 (talk) 22:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
@Italia2006: Ok sounds good - I'll revert back the edit for the excess spaces and the players on that basis. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:37, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Appreciate it, but already done actually. Cheers, as always Italia2006 (talk) 22:38, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
@Italia2006: Yup, just went and it was done - just watch your 3RRs eh don't want to give them a reason to block you, even if you are technically in the right. I'll keep a closer eye on the article for this. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:39, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
I appreciate it, and yes you're absolutely right. Italia2006 (talk) 22:41, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Buffalo family

Hi, Vaselineeeeeeee

Thanks for the help. I don't have much access to Canadian mafia news articles. Do you know who is running the Papalia family today? Or who took over the old Bordonaro family?

Thanks again --Vic49 (talk) 01:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@Vic49: Thanks for the note. Sources for the Papalia family are a lot harder to come by than the Musitanos or the Luppinos who have been in the news a lot recently. It is possible that the Papalia family is decimated after the deaths of the Papalia brothers et al. I don't have Iced: The Story of Organized Crime in Canada (although it usually has decent page previews), but I do have The Enforcer:Johnny Pops Papalia, A Life and Death in the Mafia (which I don't think speculates who is running the family now) and Mafia Inc.: The Long, Bloody Reign of Canada's Sicilian Clan that relates to the Rizzutos (Vito's son Leonardo is suspected of running the family now), if you find anything in a limited page preview that you'd like me to look up. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:59, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
@Vaselineeeeeeee: Hi, I found this it is interesting. Its about the Volpe brothers and Harry Bordonaro (an attorney) and his father Calogero Bordonaro. I think Paul Volpe was made into the Buffalo family and then took over the old Bordonaro family when Calogero Bordonaro retired. Then Volpe began moving into Toronto rackets.
@Vic49: Thanks for the source - I added it to his page to reference his birth date and brothers' involvement. The source though only really talks about phone calls made to one another - he can't really speculate that Volpe took over Bordonaro from this without it being original research. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:51, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
@Vaselineeeeeeee: I understand. Do you have Mob Mistress, by James Dubro (1988) I'm trying to view page - Page 21. --Vic49 (talk) 21:18, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Unfortunately, no, the only mob books I currently have are the ones I mentioned. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 23:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Films section

You might be able to get a quicker response for your GA nominations for those 2 films if you move them to the Films sections. You put them in the drama section which might slow it down. The Godfather can be switched right away, though it might be an idea to wait until after the end of Oscars week in February before transfering The Irishman to the Films sections. CodexJustin (talk) 16:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, I just decided to do both - let's see what happens. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salvatore Todaro

The article Salvatore Todaro you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Salvatore Todaro for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 18:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I don't nominate things for DYK any more since DYK is such a pain in the ass now. Feel free to nominate this GA if you wish, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★. - Tim1965 (talk) 01:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, looks like a hassle - not really down. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

There isn't a Concrete Galoshes or Sleep With the Fishes barnstar for crime-related articles, so.....

The Biography Barnstar
For your unheralded yeoman's work on Salvatore Todaro. From noticing the article, to getting it reviewed, to doing 90 percent of the work on getting it upgraded to GA... Wow! Congratulazioni! - Tim1965 (talk) 23:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
@Tim1965: Thanks! But credit where it's due, nominating and grammatical adjustments are the easy part, you brought it where it needed to be—Joseph Lonardo next! I wish I could help you with Joseph Porrello, but unfortunately I don't have access to those great offline sources that you have. Have a good weekend. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 00:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
I'm struggling with Porrello. I can find answers to things I need, but they're all primary documents and that's a no-go. I'm good to go with Big Joe whenever you are! - Tim1965 (talk) 00:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Hmm... hopefully you get there sooner or later - if you think I can be of assistance with anything just let me know and I can at least try. I'll ping you again when someone decides to review Lonardo. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Ori Spado

@vaselelineee This is a rep for Mr. Ori Spado. Cited content was added to the Colombo crime family article today in regard to Mr. Spado, which you removed. We would like to know why factual information including two references from two reputable print publications were removed. Thank you in advance for providing an explanation or reverting back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B050:86CF:A845:32B4:BAE0:1819 (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for reaching out. I initially removed the info because considering the article you edited was the "Colombo crime family", and not a biography on Spado, the promotion of his book is not relevant to the article. Please see WP:PROMO. I've re-added some of your cited info, but only left the relevant parts to the article—that he was among those indicted. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 03:38, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you sir. Mr. Spado would like to send you an electronic copy of his book for your assistance with this edit. Please reach out to schaulpr.com to connect. Best Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1520:C10C:A406:8CFB:66D9:D4AE (talk) 23:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Salvatore Todaro

Good to hear. I would place that more under "it's going to be fixed when Tim is finished building a new standalone Porrello family article - so nothing to worry about for the moment", rather than needing to do a full revert of my minor edit... but no big deal in the grand scheme of things. Jmg38 (talk) 06:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Mafia in Film

Thank you for your kind words and support, much appreciated! Now that you have mentioned it, the article on cinematic depictions must be a better place for information I found. There were other things that I wanted to mentioned that seem that a little-off topic like why there were no Mafia films in Italy under the Fascist era-namely that it did not really fit into the prevailing aesthetic of Fascist cinema, namely the telefoni bianchi films. The "white telephone films" were romantic comedies set in an upper-class milieu with a lot of musical numbers. These films were not expressly political, but there is a political message to them, namely that life in Fascist Italy was wonderful with the biggest problem being romantic misunderstandings which were always resolved happily by the final reel. Contrary to what most people think, the vast majority of films in Nazi Germany were likewise romantic musical comedies with again the same message that life in Third Reich was really wonderful, through the German films differed from the Italian films in that usually had a middle class rather than upper class settling. Getting back to Italian films, the subject of Mafia really didn't fit into the glossy "white telephone films", which is why the subject was ignored. After World War II, when there was a real reaction against the "white telephone films" and Italian film-makers got into the subject of neorealism with stories about ordinary people struggling to survive after the devastation of the war. In that context, the subject of the Mafia could be mentioned. I thought that should be mentioned, but all seemed off-topic. I'll look into a suggestion of creating an article about Italian gangster films, through I might favor organised crime in general, so I can bring in a modern classic like Gomorrah. The cinema democratico films dealing with the Camorra like Gomorrah are basically the same as the dealing with the Mafia with the difference being is that there are set on different sides of the strait of Messina. The latter-day Italian gangster films differ from the American ones in their strong sense of doom and fatalism, as suggest that groups like the Camorra and the Mafia are too deeply rooted in society to be taken out. I just need more material to bring up an article-I hate those annoying tags saying this article mostly uses one source. Thank you for your help and feedback and all your kind words! Much appreciated! Cheers!--A.S. Brown (talk) 04:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)    

@A.S. Brown: I think you've done a good job of staying on topic at the Sicilian Mafia page, relating the films back to how mafiosi or the organization are depicted in various films. I'm not an expert on the various genres of film, but there is also Poliziotteschi which may be of interest. Yes, if you want to make the info broader, a new article is probably not necessary to make as we already have Mafia film. This article mentions some popular Italian films, however its focus is really on the American Mafia. This could be fixed by adding ==American Mafia==, ==Sicilian Mafia==, ==Camorra==, etc headings. Perhaps your additions at Sicilian Mafia are getting a bit too long for the main page, but perhaps a lot of this info can be moved to Mafia film, with the main bits and a link to the rest of the info at the main page? Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Dear Vaselineeeeeeee, I think your'e right. I think material should go to the Mafia film (which would benefit from being less American-centric). As an amateur historian, it does interests me how perceptions of the Mafia, both in Sicily and in the rest of Italy changed over time from being the honorable men who are portrayed as sort of Italian version of the "noble savage" to the more recent image of the ruthless and seemingly invincible "octopus" organization with its tentacles into everything. Thank you for your advice and kind words, which are much appreciated! --A.S. Brown (talk) 02:52, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Excuse me

Under what part of WP:OR don't you understand for that regional section in the Serie A seasonal pages because that is what they are, basic WP:OR and something that no one would be interested in keeping. HawkAussie (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

It's not OR that each of those team's is associated with a city which are located in one of 20 regions in Italy. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 23:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
But it's not sourced and everything has to be sourced. HawkAussie (talk) 23:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Coppa Italia

In my opinion, a significant change has been made to the Coppa Italia article. The list of champions was replaced by a much longer list of every final (single and double legs), which has made the new section too big and has included too much detail. The Coppa Italia is a tournament, not just a final. I would like to know if I am seeing this right, or if you agree with the original edit. I hope a discussion is started (and not an edit war) on this matter.BumbleBum (talk) 01:45, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

@BumbleBum: Yes, I see that - personally I think the edit is fine as it gives a bit more context to the wins without it being too much, similar to what we have at Supercoppa Italiana. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
I see your point, but Supercoppa Italiana is a one-off game, while Coppa Italia is a tournament. Tournament pages like UEFA Champions League, NHL Playoffs, NBA Playoffs and NFL Playoffs don't list all the finalists, champions yes. The tournament pages I have listed usually have separate pages for their Finals. I might suggest that the editor create a Super Coppa Finals page.BumbleBum (talk) 03:03, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Victor Emmanuel II Monument

Ciao, avrei bisogno di un favore: avresti tempo di sistemare la voce Victor Emmanuel II Monument in modo tale da poter togliere l'avviso in cima ? Ciao, --LukeWiller (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC).

@LukeWiller: Grazie per il contatto. Non sono un esperto in materia, quindi ho appena corretto la grammatica il meglio che potevo. Non è ancora perfetto, ma sicuramente non meritava l'avviso, e non credo che l'abbia mai fatto. Grazie per le continue modifiche qui. Stai attento in Lombardia! Saluti, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:14, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Ok, grazie... :-) Purtroppo abito in Lombardia, dove tutto è bloccato. Speriamo che la situazione si risolva il prima possibile e si possa tornare alla normalità. Un saluto. --LukeWiller (talk) 10:30, 8 March 2020 (UTC).
Sì, lo spero anch'io!!! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:10, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

De Rossi

Copied from L'Eremita talk page: Hi. The user adding the Boca Juniors title to Daniele De Rossi's page has cited [1] at several projects, but I think we can agree this is not an official source and seems like his club is saying this as a sort of unofficial "tribute" to him. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 03:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Of course I agree about that. --L'Eremita (Il Romitorio) 09:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
@L'Eremita: What do you think about this source [2]? Also @Messirulez: for input. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:54, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

This is a tricky one...at first, I would be inclined to say no, as he retired in January 2020, so that was during the transfer window, and usually if a player leaves in January and the team win the league title later that year, then they don't receive a medal (an exception was Ronaldinho with Milan). However, this article from La Repubblica seems to suggest that the Argentine press have confirmed that he did win the league title, which leads me to believe that he should in fact be credited with it, and it is a better source in my opinion. I hope that helps! Best regards, Messirulez (talk) 16:07, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Here is the original article from Olé as well! Best, Messirulez (talk) 16:09, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
The football-italia.net source and the Italian-language sources, such as Repubblica.it, ANSA.it and Goal.com/it, only mention an implicit statement by the Argentine newspaper Olé. I continue to think it's just a "tribute" to him despite the retirement, there are no relevant sources proving De Rossi won the title. --L'Eremita (Il Romitorio) 16:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
@L'Eremita: I have added the link to the original article by Olé above if that helps, and I speak Spanish as well as Italian and English, so I can verify that the translations in Football Italia and La Repubblica accurate. Best, Messirulez (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
I've read that, it says: Jugó cinco partidos y, aunque ya no esté, se consagró con ¡un 100 por ciento! en los quites. (He played five games and, although he is gone, he consecrated with 100 percent!) IMHO, the statement is not very clear and the article is not a reliable source, we need an official Argentine reference (for example, an AFA statement). --L'Eremita (Il Romitorio) 16:32, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Moved to Talk:Daniele De Rossi#Boca title? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

The American Mafia

hi Vaselineee... im doing an exam paper on the American Mafia and i've seen that you have done a lot of editing on the wikipedia about that topic. the thing is that i can't use Wikipedia articles unless it is a reliable author, therefore i would like to know what your profession is? hope you will answer

- Scott — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scotthvid (talk • contribs) 14:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

@Scotthvid: My profession is not a journalist or mob historian or any of that - just an interest and hobby of mine. There are several reliable sources on American Mafia articles that you could use - just click a footnote on any given article. If you have any specific article in mind, perhaps I could be more of assistance then. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Re John Alite

All set. Thanks for letting me know. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 15:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Great, thanks! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who like The Godfather has been nominated for renaming

Category:Wikipedians who like The Godfather, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:American mobsters of Italian descent

Hi Vaselineeeeeeee, I'm here to ask you about the "American mobsters of Italian descent" category. I removed this category on the Johnny Torrio page, because I thought it wasn't for this page. Is this category also used for the Italian emigrants to the United States, or only for mobsters born in the United States of Italian descent?

Saluti, Dipascz (talk) 18:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

@Dipascz: Thanks for reaching out. Given that Italian citizenship was forfeited when acquiring American citizenship during that time, I think that the category is permissible. Also, I don't think we should be listing "criminal status" as released. Either we don't include one (which I'm for) or it should say deceased. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
@Vaselineeeeeeee: Thank you for the answer. Regarding the "criminal status", I entered this parameter with "released", having consulted Template:Infobox criminal, but I understand that it could be improper. Thanks for collaboration, Regards, Dipascz (talk) 12:23, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Juventus records

Hey Can you speak Italian? Sorry for my English. Can you copy from Italian page “Calciatori della Juventus” all the players who were in UEFA Champions League Squad of the Season, UEFA Team of the Year and FIFproWorld11? Alessandraronaldo (talk) 02:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

L'ho fatto. In the future, please make sure your edits are ready before publishing them - it makes it a lot easier on other editors who watch the pages - or you can run it by me here first. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 03:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

doubts regarding the changes in "I heard you paint houses"

hello , friend ... Recently i added information regarding the claims by michael franzese about the death of jimmy hoffa , and today , i find out that you removed it...am i missing something ? can you just explain why the changes were made...I am not angry or something but just confused... Strike938 (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

@Strike938: Thanks for reaching out. I removed it because 1. it wasn't sourced, 2. although Franzese may be a first hand account, he in himself is not a reliable source, and 3. it doesn't seem like the place for this information. This information about Franzese is added directly at the Hoffa page in the appropriate section at Jimmy Hoffa#Other accounts and speculation. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:50, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

But the fact that no one truly know and all the claims listed is the opinion madr by several other people made me to add franzese's claim too...and one more thing , can you please elaborate more on the actual "source" thing , because VladTV is just about to get 4M subs on youtube , so i think the interview of mike franzese can be taken as a claim... Strike938 (talk) 19:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

@Strike938: YouTube is generally not considered a reliable source per WP:YOUTUBE. The way you properly format a source is given at the end of the paragraph talking about Franzese on the Hoffa link I gave above. I don't think Franzese's comment is necessary to include at the book's page given we are talking about published resources such as the Tonelli and Goldsmith pieces. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Irishman

The article The Irishman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Irishman for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 14:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

HI!

Hi, Vaselineeeeeeee. Thank you for viewing me on my talk page. I am fairly new to wikipedia, and I am eager to meet new people. If you want to ask me anything, I look at my talk page as often as possible. If you want to tell me anything, just please make sure to create a new topic, by doing this: ==(write here)==

I am pleased to answer, if you have questions I can answer. Thanks again,

Shadowblade08 (talk) 14:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello?

Are u bored??

I'm impressed after I have seen ur user page, it's one of the most impressive ones I've seen.

U have reverted my la casa de papel edit and said that it's not how u add an interlanguage link, so I'm asking if u could tell me how it should be done.

Also, adding the airtimes or different countries is just merely something I hope people can reference off of. and I probably expect u to delete it after the show aires, so why is it not necessary — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russbrick (talk • contribs) 03:51, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

@Russbrick: Hi. See WP:Interlanguage link and WP:NOTADIRECTORY. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 04:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

why?

Hi Vaseline, that is not a cannolo but rather a cannoncino, I am Sicilian and I come from a family of pastry chefs, do you ...--130.25.253.155 (talk) 19:38, 4 April 2020 (UTC)--Football Missionary (talk) 19:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

are you from toronto and do you want to know better than me? :-) :-) :-) sorry but the Piedmontese cannoncino is one thing, the Sicilian cannoncino another, can't you see that it is mignon? it is not a cannolo and in addition the ricotta is dry, it is very badly done--Football Missionary (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC) cannoncini sicilaini : https://www.agrodolce.it/ricette/cannoncini-con-caffe/

Your GA nomination of The Godfather

The article The Godfather you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Godfather for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey man, just saw you nominated and got The Godfather passed for GA, which is solid. I re-wrote and sourced the majority of the article (aside from the plot) and probably should have nominated it sooner myself. I would've liked a heads up, as per the GA nominating instructions. It would have allowed others who helped significantly with bringing the article to where it is today, along with myself, to assist in the process (although the review was rather short and uninvolved). Anyhow, great work on wikipedia and keep editing! Take care. Disc Wheel (T + C) 15:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
@Disc Wheel: Yeah, sorry about that, I suppose I should've let you know, just assumed heavy editors would notice it in their watchlist. I knew that there wasn't much to be done to the article and that the review would almost be an auto pass as it obviously met the GA standards for some time - thanks to the majority of your edits. Great job with the article, wish I was a more involved editor in 2015/16 when you overhauled it, I would've gladly helped you. I basically just cleaned up the cast section, some plot stuff and other minor edits. You can also certainly chalk this one up as your GA. If you have any more projects in the future - Goodfellas, Scarface, The Godfather Part II, let me know if I can be of assistance. Best regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Oh man, I'm very interested, all those movies are favorites. Gotta get some more free time to edit at lengths like I've done in the past, but keep an eye out for me in the edit history on those puppies. Disc Wheel (T + C) 15:19, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
@Disc Wheel: Haha excellent. Tired of seeing the citation needed tags. I would've also done it myself a while ago, just lack the resources over here to do major edits. If you ever wanna cut the editing burden down on yourself, all I need is a point in the right direction and we could get those to GAs in no time. Stay well, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:25, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Because of an edit conflict I think I inadvertently clobbered one of your edits. Sorry about that. I also liked your rephrasing of my edit. Cheers--Toploftical (talk) 17:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks for helping with the GA Review of Home Alone. Cheers! Thanks, Thatoneweirdwikier Say hi 05:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
@Thatoneweirdwikier: Thanks. We did a great job on it. Pour one out for yourself as well! Stay well, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Vaselineeeeeeee, none for me, I'm afraid - I don't drink. I'll just have some water. Thanks, Thatoneweirdwikier Say hi 05:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joseph Lonardo

The article Joseph Lonardo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joseph Lonardo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 08:41, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

IABotManagementConsole [1.1]

Hi Vaselineeeeeeee - the IABotManagementConsole [1.1] tool you used created a LOT of edits in Vaughan and Richmond Hill. When I vetted its edits for York Region (just 3, thank goodness!) I found that two of the URLs it adjusted are still working. The third one was actually a bad/old URL, but it was for information about the Regional Council, so there is a current website & URL for the current Council.

My point is, I wouldn't advise using IABotManagementConsole [1.1]. I think it's failing to pick up active URLs, and in some cases there are newer, active URLs for current information. I don't use the tool, by the way - I just don't think it gave you good results. PKT(alk) 18:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

@PKT: Thanks for the message. I know some links were archived even when still working—there is an option for that when using the bot. The reasoning behind this is because they may be working now, but we want to ensure that our readers will still have access to them in the future if they ever do go dead (which stats can refs often do). This is actually also a GA recommendation—not saying these articles are near GA—just that it is good practice. I'm sure the bot makes some mistakes, but I still think it is a beneficial tool to use. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

A war against my job?

Dude, did you take me for a fool? I have been working on Wikipedia for 11 years, look at my contributions. I'm trying to do for Money Heist what already exists for other TV series much less known than this. I spend time and IQ to work and then a "television users" with a simple click start an edit war, but I certainly don't want to be at this game. I love you and you are also nice to me, but you should help me rather than go against me. --Kasper2006 (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

@Kasper2006: I'd have hoped you didn't take the rv at the template the wrong way. See Talk:List of Money Heist episodes#Summaries and split where I had split the episodes into individual season articles, that also got reverted by Brojam. I saw he gave you the guides on his talk page to go through. He is right in this case that it does not merit a split given the size of the article, and the content is virtually identical as it was on the main page. Kind regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 05:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2006 FIFA World Cup Final

The article 2006 FIFA World Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2006 FIFA World Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 23:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Cast members and other things

I thought you were happy with my job and instead it seems not Three things. 1) Why did you delete me cast members from above in the template, the other two that you deleted me (soundtrack you put it in the row and awards because it was deleted), its could have logic, but this has no reason not to stay in the footer template: 2) We cannot wait for sgeureka to wake up from his lethargy, if I am going to create the pages of the characters I can do it, it is absolutely not true that they are copied from the draft of sgeureka because its are made with a professional setting including infobox with photos, new notes, external links and footer template. 3) It is not that by chance, after those who roll back to you, now you too are not realizing the immense popularity (in many countries it is the TV series number one) that is having La casa di papel in the world and therefore of attention it deserves on Wikipedia? Because we do Wikipedia for users who use it not for the ego of possible bureaucratic nerds. Kind regards. --Kasper2006 (talk) 04:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

@Kasper2006: I didn't delete them from the template, just shifted the links. I see where you're coming from, but while I see your good intentions, I don't necessarily support everything you're doing. The cast page you made I still really think should've been waited to be created as sgeureka already had the draft that was about ready to publish. Sure, Money Heist is very popular right now, but that doesn't mean we should go and create everything in sight when it is essentially the same info from the main article. If you have other prose to go along with some of these, I suggest you create drafts or do it in your sandbox so all the info is there before you publish. I would advise not making any other character articles at the moment. Not every character needs its own page especially when the cast article is brought up to speed, such that I also don't think the Arturo article is needed. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 05:06, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Player positions categories

Hi, as you have participated in the discussion (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Player positions categories), I thought to let you know that all three positions are being discussed at Categories for Discussion (full-backs, wing-halves, and centre-backs). It would be appreciated if you could also give your comment there. Thanks, Nehme1499 (talk) 16:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Frank Gallo

Hello, you reverted my edit on my Frank Gallo due to it not "having a neutral point of view". I'd like to say that my intention was to due the exact opposite, it was to simply provide information on other sources who disagree about Sheeran's involvement, in contrast to the sources already provided who agree that Sheeran was involved. With your agreement I'd like to revert your revert and if you don't agree, I'd like to know why, and would be happy to discuss any changes you would like to make to my edit before being reverted, thanks. --Kwwhit5531 (talk) 18:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

@Kwwhit5531: Thanks for reaching out. There were several issues with your edit at JOE Gallo. One is that "alleged" involvement of Frank Sheeran definitely does not merit its own section per WP:UNDUE, and information about Hoffa is also undue given this is more related to Sheeran. We are only concerned with information pertaining to Gallo. Also some of those sources did not even mention Sheeran. I added some of the info back pertaining to the truthfulness of Sheeran's claim of murdering Gallo with attribution to the Sheeran article. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

John Franzese Jr

I started a discussion here [[3]], would appreciate input. Unbroken Chain (talk) 16:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Million Award for Home Alone

The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Home Alone (estimated annual readership: 1,600,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 11:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

More Million Awards

The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Money Heist (estimated annual readership: 3,900,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 12:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
The Million Award
For your contributions to bring The Godfather (estimated annual readership: 2,500,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 12:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Gianluigi Buffon (estimated annual readership: 1,080,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 12:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

It's the non-vital article which had the most views, but that's the Netflix effect. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Cheers! – Reidgreg (talk) 12:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to RedWarn

Hello, Vaselineeeeeeee! I'm Ed6767. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta my new tool called RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by over 80 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 13:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

@Ed6767: Wow - so far this has been an excellent tool - especially when warning other editors quickly! Keep up the great work! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Vaselineeeeeeee, thank you! Glad to hear it's working well :) Ed6767 talk! 14:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
On a different note, you are a rollbacker, so you may prefer using rollback instead of psuedo-rollback as it is much quicker - you can change this under preferences > behavior > Rollback Method Ed6767 talk! 14:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Transfermarkt

Ciao! I derange you because I kow you know the answer. Why is Transfermarkt considered unreliable? Because I know that for Premier league and many others football tournements it is, but I know that is absolutely reliable and complete for Italia and Deutschland. Thanks to help me understand!--Tre di tre (talk) 18:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Tre di tre, See any of the countless discussions at WT:FOOTY here [4] Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
I checked your link and found only a few discussions dated 2012 (eight years ago!) and the only mentioned reason why Transfermarkt is considered not reliable is that it is user-made that is false. On the contrary of Wikipedia and, for instance, Discogs, on Transfermarkt modifications are approved BEFORE publication and not after, by selected datascouts. It is a German site, after all. There are more recent and circumstanced reasons that I could read or it is a decision no more discussed? Thank you again.--Tre di tre (talk) 19:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Tre di tre, perhaps you’d like to start a new discussion at WT:FOOTY about this. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 23:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Hope not to start a mess... ...finger crossed! See you there. Thanks--Tre di tre (talk) 07:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Oz

Opps re Oz, didnt realise it was a blog. Somebody needs to write that section though, as I've seen it said in several high profile books and interviews. Ceoil (talk) 01:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

@Ceoil: Thanks for the note. Can you provide those books where this was said? Also, interviews with whom? I did a quick Google search, and from what I can find, David Chase, the creator of The Sopranos and other writers, etc, have not stated this. We know Tony Soprano had influence in Walter White because Vince Gilligan has said so, so if no one who had a hand in making The Sopranos can corroborate this, then the critics/people who do say that Oz "paved the way" for The Sopranos really have no substantive basis for saying so. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Will do, I have more than a few relevant books to hand, but thrown about so will be later over the weekend. For now its zzzz. Ceoil (talk) 01:49, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 10:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

To save us all from Satan's power

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...To_Save_Us_All_from_Satan%27s_Power

When you've finished your business with the pilot episode, I would be grateful if you'd look at the last paragraph of this episode.

The previous version began: "On Christmas morning ..." and describes the family opening their presents. Now someone has changed it to: "In the morning of Boxing Day ..." I can't check the whole episode, but I think the previous version is surely right, and the 'correction' is surely wrong. What do you think?

Thank you. Best wishes.

April 31st (talk) 13:54, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Re: The Godfather

Hey @Vaselineeeeeeee, pleased to e-meet ya! First off - apologies if I'm doing this wrong. First time editing a User:Talk page! So be patient with me!! :-D

Reason I'm getting in touch is you reverted a recent edit of mine that included John Cazale in the list of actors in The Godfather ensemble. The reason you gave for removing Cazale is that he didn't appear on the poster block. This seems a little arbitrary to me because Poster blocks change over time and, even during the original theatrical release, aren't uniform across territories, particularly not back in the 19070s!! And, even if they were, the definition of "ensemble" is not based on poster blocks.

With regards to Poster Blocks, Apocalypse Now, for example, doesn't list any actors on its poster block (and famously didn't have credits) yet actors are still listed on its Wiki page. The more recent theatrical releases of The Godfather had John's name on the poster block.

As for "ensembles", the Wikipedia definition is that an ensemble "comprises multiple principal actors and performers who are typically assigned roughly equal amounts of screen time". Poster blocks or credits aren't prerequisites for inclusion in an ensemble. Specifically in this instance, John Cazale plays one of Vito's three sons and his role is central to the story. He's broadly accepted as being one of the greatest character actors of all time, and he had quite a share of screen time, so to exclude his name from the ensemble, particularly on the basis of the poster block, is arbitrary.

Unless, of course, there's a specific Wiki rule stating that appearance in a poster block is requisite for appearing in an ensemble. Is there such a rule? If not, why not just include him? What does it hurt?

Finally - apologies again if this is done incorrectly! Let me know what to change and I'll get better!! Cheers, omahonyjason

Omahonyjason (talk) 18:49, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

@Omahonyjason: Thanks for the note, just make sure a new message is placed at the bottom of the talk page. Your rationale is fair, but I still believe we should go with the poster block. That is how we determine who is listed in "starring" in the infobox, and thereby should be consistent for the starring list in the lead. I also changed the "ensemble" wording to "starring", in that case. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
@Vaselineeeeeeee:

At the bottom of the page, eh? I did not know that!! Thanks for the heads up. Or, I suppose, heads down!! :) Thanks for the change from "ensemble" to "starring", think that makes it much clearer. And appreciate the reply! Omahonyjason (talk) 19:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

List of Gomorrah episodes

I edited the plot summaries with reference to Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Writing_about_fiction and after reading Wikipedia:How_to_write_a_plot_summary. I've also searched around https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents and past discussions, and I can't see any information or decision anywhere suggesting that plot summaries should not have paragraphs.

I divided these summaries into manageable paras because the plots of these episodes are complex, and have already been quite well condensed, with much detail omitted. But the length of the summaries is such that paragraph breaks are required to break up each summary into readable chunks. Currently, with no paragraphs, most of the summaries are very difficult to read.

If I'm missing something, please enlighten me, otherwise I'm minded to revert your edit.

Centrepull (talk) 16:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

@Centrepull: Thanks for the note. Those links you used are primarily guides for film plot writing. Per MOS:TVPLOT summaries should be about 200 words. I have disagreed with users on this guide in the past, but it should be used when it can be used. Since that is a small amount of words, paragraphs need not be used. That is why mention of paragraphs are not explicitly written in the guide. Look at literally any popular show plot summaries and you will not see paragraphs. The Gomorrah summaries are a little long, perhaps rightfully so in some instances, and perhaps not in others, but I still think we should not use paragraphs as they are never used for tv plots as they are supposed to be short and may also encourage longer summaries. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Gotti jr

I don't think people will stop flat-out calling Gotti an informant unless his abortive proffer is explained. Personally, I'm not sure how far he was willing to go, but here's an NYDN article of his lawyer saying the info he gave was completely useless.

I tried to find where Jerry Capeci first broke the story, but all I could dig up were later articles referencing the scoop. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 16:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

@Lenin and McCarthy: This is just a back and forth between editors rivaling Gotti Jr and Alite. If you can find reliable sources that will add more context to either article, that would always be helpful. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Reliability of Sources on Brian De Palma

Hey there! I see you've reverted my edits on the Criticism section of the De Palma page. It looks like the reason was because of the reliability of the sources. I'm looking at the WP:RS page and I'm not 100% sure as to how the sources I provided are lacking in this context, though I'm new to editing Wikipedia so it's entirely possible I'm missing something. 2601:1C0:CF00:6D2:9895:8883:74AC:8CF2 (talk) 04:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit. Some of the sources you use seem to be blog posts. Please take concerns to the article’s talk page first per WP:BRD. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 13:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Government witnesses cat

I've only been paying a little attention to the informant/witness furor, but I think Category:Government witnesses is too broad a name. Strictly speaking it could refer to any sort of prosecution witness. Something like Category:Cooperating witnesses might be more along the lines of what's needed, with subcategories like Category:American Mafia cooperating witnesses.

I'd bring this to CFD, but as the category creator if you can thing of a clarification you'd like to use you could have it done faster. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 18:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

User:Lenin and McCarthy I redirected the cat to Category:Cooperating witnesses. You can go ahead with the subcats if you like. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

PageSwap

Just did a G6 on a set of moves you made a few weeks ago (not the end of the world) but as a Page Mover you might be interested in User:Andy M. Wang/pageswap, which semi-automates the page swap process and ensures that you're not leaving behind unnecessary redirects in the draft space. Cheers, Primefac (talk) 19:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

@Primefac: Thanks, but it already looks like I have that script at User:Vaselineeeeeeee/common.js, so not sure why it caused all those extra draft space pages. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Always possible for glitches, I guess. I could have sworn you didn't have it installed on your common when I checked (and it didn't leave the usual tags either) which is why I mentioned it. As I said, though, not a big deal! Primefac (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Jamie-Lynn Sigler

Hi. Back in August, I made an edit on the Jamie-Lynn Sigler article citing an interview in which she stated that her real name is "Jamie Sigler" and that Jamie-Lynn is just a stage name. I only noticed today that you reversed the edit, and I'm wondering why. Did I improperly cite the YouTube video? Should I have included a timestamp in the link? I would appreciate any insight that you could give me on the matter. Thank you for your time.

@GrooveRemoteLockjaw: See WP:YOUTUBE. YouTube is not a WP:Reliable source for reasons stated there. I also looked at the video anyway and didn't hear her say that. If you could provide me with a timestamp, I would be interested to use it to do more digging, but I have not found any print sources that corroborate this. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
@Vaselineeeeeeee: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOOVEj_THB0&t=37s Here's a link with a timestamp. I appreciate the rigourous checking of sources. GrooveRemoteLockjaw
@GrooveRemoteLockjaw: Thanks for that. That is very interesting. However, as I said above, YouTube cannot be used as a reliable source, even if it comes from the horses mouth so to speak. I encourage you to find a reliable print or web source that says this. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Capone article

Hi Vaselineeeeeeee. You made the edit I was going to make - change convictions to five, and add a citation to the original Jury Verdict form.

I find the backstory of Capone's conviction fascinating. I did not know there was so much behind it.

Jeffrey Walton (talk) 02:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

@Noloader: It is very interesting. I've seen various sources say three or five counts, but having the original document where it says five accounts is cool and is a better source. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 13:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

2020–21 Italian football season articles

Hey dude, hope everything is going well for you. I’ve been particularly busy lately with things so I haven’t been able to do anywhere near the editing I usually do, and I haven’t even looked at any of the new season articles yet. If you get the chance could you possibly check them to see if they’re up to the usual standard (no weird deviations in form, no breaches of the MOS), etc? If you could, let me know how they’re doing. If not I understand. Anyhow, cheers, and I hope you’re enjoying the new season as much as I am — crazy amount of goals so far. Italia2006 (talk) 19:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

@Italia2006: Hey, I've been well, thanks, hope you are too. The season articles look alright. The only difference is the overview sections being added back, and although I do not agree with them, I have removed them a couple months ago but got reverted several times so I'm not gonna argue over them. Most of the articles also have a different layout for the squad information lists—mostly just a copy of the player sections in the main club articles. I'm not very concerned about that either. User:SteveMc25 does a fine job updating each season article, so that's a good help. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Sounds alright. Thanks for the update man Italia2006 (talk) 22:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

North Atlantic Refinery redirect

Seems to me that the name of a company is the notable subject for an entry, with the name of the refinery being the subservient subject that should be mentioned in the company's entry. Lexicon (talk) 18:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

@Lexicon: I was debating whether to redirect the company or the oil refinery because it seems that the only refinery the company operates is the one in Come By Chance. I don't think we need both because the content on both the pages were pretty much identical. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
You're right, you definitely don't need both. I was saying that I think a company is more notable to be the subject of an article than one of its (even if it's its only) refinery. Additionally, the article says the refinery will be closing, which means there's an article for a [soon to be] closed refinery but not for the company that owns it and runs gas stations/convenience stores. Anyway, I don't have any stake in this (I showed up because I got a notice about the company's logo being orphaned, but I don't see how I was involved in it), I just thought the wrong article was being redirected and didn't want to re-redirect it without discussing it with you. Lexicon (talk) 18:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
@Lexicon: Yes, thanks for the note. I think you're right - the refinery should be redirected, not the company. I'll make that change shortly. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
@Lexicon: I ended up giving both pages a re-write. I found a good source that made me think the refinery's article should also be kept, with good early history. North Atlantic Refining is also more than just the refinery, so I tried to separate overlapping info from both articles. The history is very convoluted, but I hope it is presented in an easier way now that justifies both articles. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:32, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Copa Rio

Hello Vaselineeeeeeee, we created the page together: List of world champion football clubs, i was Alain Espadon but I changed my account because I lost my password. I wanted to ask you for protection on the page in question, from time to time the usual Palmeiras fanatics storm her to write that their team was world champion etc...Now the article is corrected by me so you can rest assured, see you soon friend--Football Missionary (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

@Football Missionary: Hi. It does not seem that the edit history of the page warrants protection. Seems like a content dispute between you and another user. Best to use the talk page to come up with a resolution. You may also use WT:FOOTY to attract more football editors to the page. In the event page protection is needed use WP:RFPP. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 03:14, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Sopranos synopses

Thank you for dealing with "The Weight". I have made some small changes there.

I'm afraid I don't agree with some of your changes to "University". If there's anything you'd like me to explain, of course I will. However, I thought it was very good to introduce the word "facetious" to describe Ralphie's behaviour.

April 31st (talk) 07:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@April 31st: Thanks for the message. Just didn't want it to seem that Meadow brought up her father's job on her own, and would like to avoid euphemisms for abortion. Thanks for rewording the part about being a made man, it makes better sense now than before, even though I didn't think it was fully necessary to include because Tony is the boss, and he can discipline. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 13:14, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Longo's

I partial-blocked two large ranges for a month; ping me if they pop up on another range and I'll protect. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Italy national team

Are you accusing me of vandalism?? Please note that I have restored the classic and original model used not only on the Italian national team page, but also on ALL the pages of the vast majority of the national teams on Wikipedia. Do you understand?

Check the other pages and you should not accuse me of vandalism, but the other user in case.--Blocci (talk) 16:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

@Blocci: I have reason to believe you are using this registered account and that IP address at the same time to avoid reverting over WP:3RR on your account—something that is not allowed—that is the reason for the WP:ANI discussion. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:39, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Question on your revert

Why did you revert my edit here? User:Gronk Oz/Bare URLs was deleted over a year ago at Gronk Oz's request. The editor has chosen not to create a new version of the page, and the red link doesn't seem to be of any use there. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 05:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

@BlackcurrantTea: Hey sorry about that didn’t even notice I did that - must’ve clicked the wrong button. I’ve self reverted. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Sopranos date

Why did you revert my edit? How can a screenshot from the show itself not be a reliable source? I am providing correct information and you are reverting it to incorrect information. Jericho735 (talk) 17:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

@Jericho735: Hey, sorry about that - I saw the link itself which looked like an unreliable website, but after now clicking on it, it's pretty clear. I've self-reverted. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
@Vaselineeeeeeee: All good. Thanks! Jericho735 (talk) 17:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Elliot Page

Hi there. Can you check the history of the article Hard Candy (film)? I think if I revert one more brand new account rewriting it I'll violate 3RR. Damien Linnane (talk) 01:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

@Damien Linnane: I'm not going to bother because it'll be changed toute suite by the countless SJWs on Wikipedia. Let's just let them have it as we wait for the RfC. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Yeah good point, I think I'll follow your example. Cheers. Damien Linnane (talk) 02:06, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Edits on Luftansa Heist page

I saw a notification while on Wikipedia today. Was just wondering what the revisions thing was all about.?? Did I miss something? Just wondering. AA Pilot16 (talk) 10:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Paolo Rossi

On 10 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Paolo Rossi, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SoWhy 10:43, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

My Cousin Vinny

Hi Vaselineeeeeeee, I am a new editor in Wikipedia, very much in the learning stage, and you just reverted my addition to the long plot description of this film. Someone had pointed out the plot was "bloated." I'm fine with the revert--I see you are of Italian heritage and this film is a favorite of yours, also of mine. I think it has delightful wit and also depth and perhaps more importance than has been granted. I do think the character Mona Lisa Vito is wonderful and deserved to be at least a bit more present in the plot, hence i thought the ending not fair in its use of the word "bicker." I did think it was strikingly important for her to point out to him that he needed help in the trial, that he will need help in the future to win cases, and in her ironic way indicating that thanking others was part of being a good lawyer (i.e. good guy, good husband, etc.) Additionally, I wonder if, in a plot description, everything should be given away. I know that online user film reviews often alert readers when reviews are "spoilers," as many people do not want the surprises given away to them and that's understandable.Latitude41N (talk) 20:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@Latitude41N: Thanks for the note. Please read WP:FILMPLOT and WP:SPOILERS. Film plots should be between 400 and 700 words and concisely describe the film, not taking into account potential spoilers, while also not being overly descriptive. Thanks, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Neapolitan pizza

Before I say anything, please excuse if I'm doing anything wrong. This is my first time editing a Wikipedia page/talking to someone on the website.

I'm confused why you keep reverting my edits. Every change I made on that page is completely accurate and easily verifiable. I can send you links to further information on the topic or I could delve deeper into any of the edits I made to clarify any confusion you may have. I am an actual Neapolitan pizza chef who noticed a bit of incorrect information. Not just some random person trying to mess up the page. 108.2.143.193 (talk) 01:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

The IPs edits are all improvements. Vas: Please undo your revert and use the talk page. SPECIFICO talk 02:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
You must be kidding. The IP put "Neapolitan pizza (Italian: pizza napoletana) also known as Naples-style pizza, is a style of pizza popularly found in Naples, Italy and known for its charred cornicione (Outer crust) with a soft and light texture". For one, he wrote "Naples" twice in the same sentence, and added unsourced WP:POV. Take any changes to talk after revert per WP:BRD. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
This needs to go to AN. You are harassing a newbie. SPECIFICO talk 02:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
LOL. One more revert by them within the 24 hour period and they will be reported to the edit warring board—newbie or not. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:17, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

I have no interest in arguing or warring over this. But the version you're so insistent on keeping "a style of pizza made with tomatoes and mozzarella cheese." Neapolitan pizza is a style not a topping combination. The marinara pizza, quatro formaggi, bianca, etc. All are a Neapolitan pizza if made in that style. My description covered the style as a whole rather than just a plain cheese and tomato pizza such as you can find in any pizza style. And that's just one of the fixes I'm trying to make. 108.2.143.193 (talk) 02:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.2.143.193 (talk) 02:31, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

That part is fair. I put it back. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Vaselineeeeeeee, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 17:22, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

@Mazewaxie: Thanks, and same to you! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!

Dear Vaselineeeeeeee, thank you for your time and help, which is greatly appreciated here! Best wishes and happy holidays! --A.S. Brown (talk) 02:31, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

@A.S. Brown: Glad to have you back A.S. Brown! Merry Christmas and all the best in 2021! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 06:07, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Misinformation

I recently fixed an outdated incorrect fact. On the Wikipedia page Chicago outfit the membership estimation was wrong and it was from 2007. I found the estimation from the FBI they stated in 2018. I checked every other Chicago outfit membership estimation and they all have the exact same thing except for the Chicago outfit Wikipedia page. Please give me the reason or proof of why you corrected my updated version. If not I will continue to update it every hour if I have too unless you can proof to me your right and everyone else is wrong. Studyhardalways2020 (talk) 23:30, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

@Studyhardalways2020: You didn't format the reference right or provide a link. See WP:CITEWEB, or put the link here and I can edit it for you. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 00:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Oh that’s it? Sorry I am still learning how to use this correctly and responsibly. I will send you updated info soon. Studyhardalways2020 (talk) 00:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Studyhardalways2020 (talk) 00:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Do you get that? Studyhardalways2020 (talk) 01:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

It won’t allow me to send the link but this is what is reads for searching it. Studyhardalways2020 (talk) 01:10, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

The Chicago Outfit | Mafia Wiki | Fandom Studyhardalways2020 (talk) 01:12, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

@Studyhardalways2020: Wiki fandom is not a WP:Reliable source. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:14, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Vaselineeeeeeee,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Jmill1806 (talk) 00:07, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
@Jmill1806: Thanks, and same to you! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 00:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Why did you delete the Paul Faraci article

Hey, just curious why you deleted the Paul Faraci article? He meets the notability guidelines and I was in the middle of adding more references. Wikieditor6557 (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Wikieditor6557: He does? The more notable topic is Pizza Pops, and the info that was on Faraci's article was almost exclusively about the company. You don't need both, and that was decided here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Faraci. If you say you have more content to add, maybe add it to your sandbox first or post a talk page discussion on the Pizza Pops article and notify the editors who were a part of the AfD. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, and a Happy New Year

The Barnstar of Diligence
For your continuing good work on the Godfather articles. Thank you!
Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 18:56, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
@Gareth Griffith-Jones: Thanks, and same to you! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Philadelphia crime family

Hello Vaslineeeeeeee. Notice "Merlino continues to serve as the boss of the crime family while living in Florida". Do you think the sources currently in the article justify this line. If so which ones? It sounds as though User:Joefromrandb, though he is imperfectly diplomatic, would accept this line if it were reworded and qualified. Would you be willing to negotiate this? I have not looked at the removal of sources that is going on, that might be another issue. Thanks EdJohnston (talk) 20:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

@EdJohnston: Thanks for having a look at this. Of course I would - that's why I was urging a talk page discussion to avoid the mass removal. The status quo should remain per BRD during that time, however. The prose could be improved, but that does not mean we have to cull everything that is reliably sourced. Specifically for the sentence you pointed out, there are several reliable sources for the last two sentences of Joey Merlino's article lead that could rework that sentence. However, something I can't overlook is the attitude of Joefromrandb in his full willingness to edit war despite BRD after I had voiced concern - that is unacceptable for an editor of his tenure. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
If you are willing to take a concrete step to get the discussion started, I can close the AN3 on that basis. If you just want admins to scold the other party for their bad attitude, it's another matter, perhaps to be handled at ANI. If you *do* try to negotiate and you get stonewalled then there is a new problem that could be addressed when it happens. EdJohnston (talk) 23:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
@EdJohnston: I didn't post the complaint to the edit warring noticeboard for him to be scolded for their bad attitude, I did it because they willingly went over 3RR because they were reading into 3RRNO in a way that would benefit them, and therefore should be blocked on that basis. I will try to hash it out on the talk page, but given the user wanted all 10,000 bytes removed due to bogus BLP issues (or ones that can be fixed without culling), I'm not so sure the user will be receptive - and it is also doubtful they will leave the previous version up while that discussion takes place. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 23:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
The problem with your edit warring complaint is that one line that (superficially) appears to be unsourced defamation: "Merlino continues to serve as the boss of the crime family while living in Florida". If you can do something to get that line taken off the table, the other party might be blockable for their other edits. EdJohnston (talk) 23:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
@EdJohnston: That's fair. I have fixed that sentence to something I think is now less defamatory. Hope this is satisfactory. Best, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 00:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi

Hi. You reverted my edit on Merlino's article, kindly asking me to take the issue to the talk page. I've happily done so. Sadly, you haven't responded to elaborate on your reasoning for removal or indeed to address my point for inclusion. You kindly provided a couple of stand-alone acronyms in your initial remove (although that's a form of communication which I find unsettling and cult-like, but that's another matter), which I've read. But I was assuming you'd expand on this - specifically to highlight exactly how you consider it to run afoul. I don't know how things work here - for all I know you're judge, jury and executioner who doesn't need to properly explain oneself, but I'd like to think you've just simply forgotten and will do me the common courtesy of responding in due course. Thanks a lot. VideoGamePlaya (talk) 15:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Review Dan Friedkin Suggested Edits?

Hi there! I was wondering if you wouldn't mind taking a look at our suggested edits on the Dan Friedkin TALK page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dan_Friedkin We have suggested updates to this page to fill out the bio - open to any feedback as well. I noticed you've edited the page before so thought you could be helpful! Thanks! LucyArn (talk) 19:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

@LucyArn: Thanks for the message. Those suggestions seem to be reliably sourced, so I don't see anything glaringly against policy after taking a quick look. Don't forget you can also use your User:LucyArn/sandbox when you work on large improvements over a longer period of time. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Vaselineeeeeeee Thank you, appreciate it. And good tip! Would you be able to push these suggestions live? It's my understanding that an editor should handle.LucyArn (talk) 15:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Vaselineeeeeeee, Hi there, me again! I noticed there was one section of our suggested edits that may have been missed/unseen. Citations 1-4 on the Dan Friedkin talk page - was hoping those could get added to his upfront section above 'Early Life'? Let me know any thoughts! Thanks! LucyArn (talk) 01:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
@LucyArn: Thanks, must have missed it. I added it to the career section since it is part of his career and should follow chronological order. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Vaselineeeeeeee Great, thank you! LucyArn (talk) 03:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

'Ndrangheta

Hi Vaselineeeeeeee. You reverted my edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%27Ndrangheta&oldid=1002682814 . What was specifically wrong with my edit? Thanks. Niesomdoma (talk) 08:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

I still suggest to add "No evidence between 'Ndrangheta and the murder was seriously considered after the initial suspicions. The people who were sentenced of the murder (Miroslav Marček, Tomáš Szabó, Zoltán Andruskó) or acquitted of ordering the hitman (Marián Kočner, Alena Zsuzsová) had no links to 'Ndrangheta. [1]" to Slovakia paragraph of the 'Ndrangheta article. Niesomdoma (talk) 21:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
@Niesomdoma: That source does not let me read the full article. Are you certain that that info you want to add is corroborated by the source? Can you copy and paste this part from the article that demonstrates this? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
@Vaselineeeeeeee: Thanks for the reply. Any of these links: Spectator.sme.sk ; Euronews; Politico.eu may serve as a good reference to conclusion of the murder trial. No mention of 'Ndrangheta in any of these. Give me green light and I will finish the paragraph with the references you approve. As for links between Slovakia and 'Ndrangheta this article in Slovak is providing very detailed info: SME.sk; --Niesomdoma (talk) 12:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
@Niesomdoma: I still don't see that info in those sources. The last Slovak source I auto translated and can only read up to "Carmine is dead". Are you saying that since Kočner was acquitted (who had 'Ndrangheta connections?) and the people who were charged (Marček, Szabó, and Andruskó) had no link to the 'Ndrangheta, and that's what you want to add? Could you copy and paste the passage from one of those sources where that is said? Thanks, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Terenzani, Michaela (7 September 2020). "No end to impunity yet. How the verdict will affect Slovakia". Spectator.sme.sk. Retrieved 25 January 2021.

WP:ONUS

You cited a sentence from WP:ONUS, but not the relevant one, The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content. Also, the stable version of the article is the one without the deadname (contra the claim in your edit summary). I trust that you will therefore self-revert, as your edit did not comply with either policy you cited when making it. Newimpartial (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@Newimpartial: I checked to see if the birthname was included as far back as 2018, and it was present, without edit warring, so how is that not stable? Regarding ONUS, I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on the 'disputed' content as it seems that the ongoing discussion in line with BRD will duly produce a result, which seems more productive than edit warring over the stable content. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Flag of Italy

Ciao, ho profondamente ampliato la voce Flag of Italy (è passata da 76 a 109 kb) traducendo all'analoga voce su Wikipedia in italiano. Dato che "Flag of Italy" è una voce di qualità, non vorrei che con le mie aggiunte perdesse il riconoscimento di qualità. Avresti tempo di darci una lettura per sistemare le mie imprecisioni linguistiche ? Fai conto che se hai dubbi faccio in fretta a recuperare il testo originale in italiano, quindi se ci sono frasi poco chiare, chiedi pure. Ti ringrazio in anticipo. Ciao, LukeWiller (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC).

@LukeWiller: Ciao. Grazie per il tuo lavoro su en.wiki in materie italiane! Sempre sono felice di aiutarti! Ora ho esaminato completamente l'articolo e risolto alcune cose minori. Alcune frasi sono ancora un po troppo lunghe, il che è qualcosa a cui stare attenti. Saluti, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 00:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al Capone

The article Al Capone you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Al Capone for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rocco Perri

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rocco Perri you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Million Award for Al Capone

The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Al Capone (estimated annual readership: 4,500,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rocco Perri

The article Rocco Perri you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rocco Perri for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 01:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

You reverted one of my early edits. I didn't quite know what I was doing according to the manuals of style and it was because of you that I switched from a user who mostly ip edits typographical issues on a rare occasion, to someone who invested some actual time into reading the best way to edit Wikipedia. So simply thank you and have a cuppa on me CurrentlyResearching (talk) 18:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
@CurrentlyResearching: That's great to hear! Hopefully you can become a productive editor here, and I've sent you some links to help. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

db notifications

Thank you for helping sort the draft queue. Something that would be helpful would be welcome the creators of CSD contents with template:First article and to notify of them of the tagging. If you use TWINKLE or other tools, you can set your preferences to do these automatically. Best, --Deepfriedokra (talk)

Sounds good, thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

News today: Project Sindacato

I have updated the 'Ndrangheta article: 

   Charges stayed in one of Ontario's largest Mob busts after alleged illegal conduct by investigators The operation, dubbed Project Sindacato, resulted in charges against nine people in Canada who police alleged were part of a criminal organization with ties to the Mob in Italy. 

   On Jan. 27, prosecutors stayed the charges against six of the accused, including alleged boss Angelo Figliomeni, after defence lawyers raised concerns that investigators committed "significant breaches of solicitor/client privilege." Three of the accused previously had their charges stayed in 2020. Authorities involved in the case alleged that Angelo Figliomeni is the head of the 'Ndrangheta in Toronto, but Lacy said the York Regional Police investigation uncovered no such evidence.

   After two years of work, millions of dollars in costs and extensive resources expended, Canadian authorities have almost nothing to show for it. All property seized by police must now be returned — with the exception of illegal possessions, such as the gambling machines, Lacy said https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/sindacato-charges-stayed-mob-york-police-1.5925133

Peter K Burian (talk) 14:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

@Peter K Burian: Thanks for letting me know. I updated Siderno Group as well. Will be interesting to see the sentences laid in the coming months/years. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
@Peter K Burian: Thanks for all the updates. Lol ignorant me thought "stayed" meant the charges stuck—what a stupid term. Anyway, it's funny how all the assets will be returned to them but I find it hard to believe that the mobsters can prove all that cash came from legitimate sources. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 23:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
There was a January article too, by Edwards, but I did not see it at the time. https://www.thespec.com/news/ontario/2020/01/27/mafia-boss-with-ties-to-gta-arrests-found-dead-in-italian-prison-cell.html Mafia boss with ties to GTA arrests found dead in Italian prison cell Giuseppe (Pino) Gregoraci, 51, of Siderno, Italy .... Gregoraci visited the Toronto area last spring, looking for clues on the murder of his cousin Carmelo (Mino) Muia, who was shot dead in Siderno on Jan. 18, 2018, police said.

Excerpt: While in the Toronto area, they met the brothers Cosimo and Angelo Figliomeni of York Region, Italian police said. The Figliomeni brothers were arrested last August in the Canadian arm of a transnational operation called Project Sindicato, which York Regional Police called the region's largest-ever anti-Mafia operation.

York police at the time said they considered Angelo Figliomini as the head of an international 'Ndrangheta group with a base in York Region.

Angelo Figliomeni moved to York Region shortly after he was charged in Italy with weapons and Mafia-association offences in 1992.

York police said Project Sindicato targeted builders, bankers, real estate agents and others in the financial sector. Police say the organization was involved in illegal gambling and loansharking, and laundered some of its money through regular visits to legal, government-run casinos.

At the time of the arrests last summer, police in the GTA seized five Ferrari sports cars, 27 homes and millions of dollars in cash while shutting down some 500 bank accounts.

"We have dismantled the financial structure of this organized crime operation, both here and in Italy," York Regional Police Chief Eric Jolliffe said at the time.

Gregoraci was one of 28 alleged members and associates of the 'Ndrangheta who were arrested in southern Italy in July 2019 in the Italian arm of Project Sindicato.

At the time of the arrests, Italian police said they had snared the "top management" of the Muia and Figliomeni Mafia organization. Peter K Burian (talk) 15:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

More insights from York Police

Another article that I don't recall seeing when it was published, by Reuters, Jul 18, 2019 

  the alleged boss, Angelo Figliomeni,... alias the “brigante” or the “bandit,” has been sought in Italy for almost a decade and is appealing a 20-year jail sentence there. Because he is a Canadian citizen and the crime of Mafia association does not exist in Canada, he could not be extradited and was living comfortably in Vaughan, a suburb of Toronto.

   In Canada, he developed a massive money laundering operation, according to York police Detective Sergeant Carl Mattinen, who helped spearhead the investigation. Money was laundered through legal casinos in Canada, Mattinen added, saying Figliomeni’s organization had “cleaned an excess of C$70 million in only a few short years.”

   The so-called “Figliomeni Group” also ran illegal gambling dens out of cafes, 11 of which were seized by police. Police seized 27 homes and 23 luxury vehicles, including one Ferrari valued at C$880,000.

   A car-loan business was also used to launder money, police said. https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/politics-news-pmn/canadian-police-nab-nine-suspected-members-of-powerful-mafia-clan

Peter K Burian (talk) 15:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

National Post: https://www.thechronicleherald.ca/news/canada/italian-mafia-boss-visiting-canada-unwittingly-carried-a-police-wiretap-to-his-meetings-340657/
   The latest arrests in Italy were codenamed “Operazione Canadian ’Ndrangheta Connection 2,”

  Vincenzo Muià, who was among those arrested in Italy, arrived at Toronto’s Pearson international airport on March 31 ... Muià said he came to Canada for only one thing, to meet with Angelo and Cosimo Figliomeni, two alleged leaders within the ’Ndrangheta who left Siderno, a town in Calabria, Italy, for Canada when they faced Mafia association charges. Here, authorities allege, their underworld influence is considerable.

   Muià sought answers to a gnawing question: Who had ambushed and killed his brother, Carmelo Muià, known as “Mino,” who was shot dead in Siderno on Jan. 18, 2018.

   After meeting with Angelo and Cosimo Figliomeni, according to allegations by Italian police, Muià was ready to go back home, figuring he had learned all he could here.

Peter K Burian (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Peter Edwards has posted an article on the Star Web site; I am a subscriber so can read it. Added one quote from this article, since it was better than the one in the CBC article: Massive GTA Mafia bust collapses. Defence says York police accessed lawyers’ communications Peter Edwards Feb. 24, 2021. Nothing too significant but some different quotes.
   Recaps the project, then continues ... The prosecution’s case fell apart after defence lawyers attacked police conduct in the investigation, saying they unlawfully accessed solicitor-client communications, Lacy said

   “Mr. Figliomeni has always maintained that he did not commit any criminal offence,” Lacy said. “It was our position that the Crown’s case was premised on innuendo, suspicion and unsubstantiated allegations. Quite apart from what we alleged was significant police illegality, we were confident that Mr. Figliomeni was going to be exonerated.”

   A spokesperson for York Regional Police said the force is “extremely disappointed” in the Crown’s decision to not proceed to trial on the criminal charges in Project Sindicato. “We remain very proud of this investigation and of the many members who worked so tirelessly throughout the 18 months it took to complete,” Nicolle said.

Peter K Burian (talk) 16:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

A goat for you!

You are a great!

Dr Salvus (talk) 15:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Thanks! I'll take this as G.O.A.T. hahahah Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Gotti

The article John Gotti you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Gotti for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Million Award for John Gotti

The Million Award
For your contributions to bring John Gotti (estimated annual readership: 2,100,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 14:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vito Rizzuto

The article Vito Rizzuto you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vito Rizzuto for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Johnny Papalia

The article Johnny Papalia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Johnny Papalia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Walter Gretzky

On 7 March 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Walter Gretzky, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 01:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

List of Sicilian Dishes

Hi, I saw that you removed cous cous di pesce alla trapanese from the List of Sicilian dishes. I am wondering why as this is an important dish. Philipp.governale (talk) 01:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

@Philipp.governale: Did I? Don't remember. Feel free to add it. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Will do thanks for your reply. Philipp.governale (talk) 02:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Albert Anselmi

A user named "Liz" deleted the biography of Albert Anselmi. I think, because he is not famous enough. But Anselmi is pretty famous for a gangster. I do not know how to fix this or if I should fix this. Thank you. JoeDetweiler — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeDetweiler (talk • contribs) 04:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

I WP:PROD’d it with no objection based on it not meeting WP:CRIME. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 04:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Roy DeMeo

I haven't been in a rush to add citations to this article because it's mostly cited to The Murder Machine, which is considered the definitive book on the subject. It just doesn't use inline citations for it. Harizotoh9 (talk) 04:27, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok, will you be adding them eventually? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
I added the ABC news article, and I'll add some more. But I'm pretty sure it's most or all accurate so it's not a huge priority. I did a lot of work on the Larry Lawton and Richard Kuklinski articles recently because they had major problems. My copy of Murder Machine is an epub I got from amazon, meaning it doesn't have page numbers. I could add citations to the chapters, but not individual pages. Someone would have to get the print edition to get specific pages. Harizotoh9 (talk) 18:19, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Sounds good, thanks for that work! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
There's some modern and archival online sources from newspapers, but a lot of the real bulk is gonna be books and newspapers from the time which can't be easily accessed online. Whenever there's a free weekend I clip a bunch of articles on newspapers.com. Also I've looked at a few other mob articles. Around adding some sources to Michael Franzese since it's a messy article, Gianni Russo is a mess and he's a known teller of tall tales meaning making an article will be hard when half his interviews are filled with WP:FRINGE. Frank Cullotta just died recently so there's a bunch of articles on him. Also I don't think Andrei Katz as a victim is notable enough. Harizotoh9 (talk) 22:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
@Harizotoh9: If you think Franzese is still a little messy now, this is what it looked like before I did significant overhauls since 2019, similar to you on DeMeo now. I don't have a newspapers.com account, so I know that is valuable information that can be put to work, so thanks. I've prod'd Katz. You probably know this, but NYT's paywall can be bypassed by using internet archive. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

I don't have a paid account for newspapers just a free one so I clip when there's a free weekend. Once clipped articles are fully viewable by anyone even without an account. Here's what I've clipped and here's a bunch of stuff for Franzese for example. These kind of articles are invaluable because a modern profile might reference something, but won't go into too much detail. Also, the Associated Press' online archive is far from incomplete so you will only find some of them in newspapers.

Oh, I didn't even know that John Franzese Jr. had a page! Only the Indianna Star article is actually about him, the rest is about his testimony at Sonny's trial. A bunch of the sources on his page are crap tabloids like Huffpost or NY Post. My gut says he's not really notable enough for a page like his dad and brother. Harizotoh9 (talk) 01:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Oh, very cool thanks for the links. When I have a free week I'll go through them for Michael. With regards to John Jr., I think he just barely meets the notability cutoff, being part of that high profile case and being the first son of a mob figure to testify against his father. WP:HUFFPOST is still reliable, but WP:NYPOST is now not. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Anniversary of the Unification of Italy

Ti segnalo questa mia richiesta: ti ho scritto perchè la pagina è protetta e servirebbe un amministratore. Tu conosci qualche amministratore che potrebbe intervenire ? Ciao, --LukeWiller (talk) 13:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC).

@LukeWiller: Ho chiesto a un amministratore di dare un'occhiata. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Ok, grazie... :-) --LukeWiller (talk) 14:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)-

Gnocchi

Hello Vaselineeeeeeee,

Please remove all items that refer to gnocchi as pasta. This is not true. There are similarities between the ingredients in gnocchi and pasta, but process is not the same. Would you say that water and hydrogen peroxide are the same? No you would not, even though they are both made of oxygen and hydrogen. Gnocchi is a dumpling. Such a simple recipe to create something that is beautiful and complex. The process to make pasta versus gnocchi is completely different. Pasta takes the time to develop the gluten in the flour. Gnocchi is the opposite. The art of combining the ingredients together just enough for them to hold, but still create a like pillowy dumpling. I apologize for the undo. This is my first time editing on Wikipedia. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AW204 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@AW204: Please add these comments to Talk:Gnocchi#Pasta or not pasta?. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 23:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Do I just wait now? How long does this take for a dispute to resolve itself?AW204 (talk) 23:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Flag of Italy e altre voci

Ciao, avrei bisogno che mi rileggessi alcune mie aggiunte. Nella voce "Flag of Italy" ho ampliato i paragrafi Italian unification, The two world wars and the interwar period e Italian Republic, ed ho aggiunto il nuovo paragrafo The flag of Italy in the arts. Ho anche aggiunto alla voce "Cockade of Italy" il nuovo paragrafo The cockade of Italy in music e alla voce "National colours of Italy" ho aggiunto il nuovo paragrafo The tricolour in the arts. Ti ringrazio in anticipo. --LukeWiller (talk) 14:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC).

Esaminerò quando ho un po di tempo :) Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Ok, grazie... :-) --LukeWiller (talk) 22:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC). P.S.: Ho visto solo adesso il tuo messaggio perché non mi avevi pingato.
@LukeWiller: Scusa per il ritardo. Adesso è fatto. C'erano solo piccole correzioni. Mi chiedevo se saresti anche disposto a tradurre Italian Canadians#History nel it.wiki perché non credo che sarei in grado di rendergli giustizia. Grazie, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Sì, dammi qualche giorno e mi metto al lavoro. Grazie per la disponibilità. Ciao, --LukeWiller (talk) 17:40, 26 March 2021 (UTC).
Il mio inglese però è un po' zoppicante: forse conviene organizzarci come qua su en.wiki. Traduci tu su it.wiki, poi io le darò una ripassata. --LukeWiller (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2021 (UTC).
@LukeWiller:, @SurdusVII: Ho aggiunto la traduzione. Devo ammettere che ho dovuto usare un traduttore per alcuni - spero che non è troppo "messed up". Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
La prima ripassata gliel'ho appena data: ci tornerò su nei prossimi giorni (è praticamente a posto, gli va data ancora qualche limata qua e là). --LukeWiller (talk) 17:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC).
@LukeWiller: Grazie per le varie correzioni. Spero sia stata una lettura interessante per te! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 23:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Di niente, figurati... :-) Sì, è stata molto interessante: tra l'altro ho da tempo l'obiettivo di ampliare Italian diaspora, che prima o poi farò. Ciao, --LukeWiller (talk) 17:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC).

List of Coppa Italia finals

Hi. Thank you for correct my grammatical errors in this page. Would you help me add more text to the page to make it more interesting to readers?

@Dr Salvus: No problem. I see you want to make it a WP:FL. You should model it after Serie A Coach of the Year, an FL. Expand on the history. I can help clean it. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much. I don't have much imagination on what to write. I don't have much imagination on what to write. Since English is my third language, would you mind if we talked to each other in Italian or French? Dr Salvus 21:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
@Dr Salvus: puoi scrivere in italiano - ti faccio sapere se ho problemi a capire. Ti aiuterei con la scrittura se pensassi di poterlo fare. Il problema è che le fonti non sono così accessibili da quel vecchio periodo di tempo, e quindi non posso scrivere su qualcosa che non può essere verificato dalle fonti. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Il problema della Coppa Italia è che è un torneo che veniva snobbato da tutte le squadre. Di conseguenza ci sono poche informazioni. Per esempio mancano tante informazioni sulle finali più "antiche", spero che questo non sia un problema per rendere questa pagina un FL. Dr Salvus 22:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
@Dr Salvus: Purtroppo questo potrebbe essere un problema perché WP:WIAFL dice che l'articolo deve essere esauriente, e senza queste informazioni non lo è. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:49, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Penso che comunque questa carenza di informazioni sia ampiamente giustificata. Nelle candidature FL alcuni commentatori hanno capito questo problema Dr Salvus 23:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Ho trovato alcune informazioni su trasfermarkt.com purtroppo esso non è una fonte affidabile Dr Salvus 13:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Purtroppo, non credo che questo articolo soddisferà mai lo standard, e non è una cosa negativa. Penso che sarebbe una situazione simile con l'articolo Capocannoniere. La completezza delle fonti semplicemente non c'è. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Peccato, questo articolo meritava di più per la qualità della prosa. Pazienza. Se ti va puoi aiutarmi con la pagina Overseas teams in the main competition of the Coupe de France oppure con Gela e Pachino. Dr Salvus 17:58, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Se vedi qui molti commentatori sembrano accettare il fatto che non ci siano informazioni sulle finali prima degli anni '80. Preferirei comunque non candidare la pagina in FL per la quarta volta subito poiché sono stato anche sul WP:ANI per questa cosa Dr Salvus 18:13, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Sì, l'ho visto, ma senza quell'informazione completa l'articolo avrebbe sofferto di WP:RECENTISM. Potremmo provare a costruire sulla prosa per le partite successive agli anni 2000 prima di una rinominazio. Sì, sicuramente non rinominarlo nel suo stato attuale poiché non è ancora cambiato nulla. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Penso che non sei stato chiaro. Spiega le tue intenzioni in inglese. Dr Salvus 20:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
I just meant that the article should definitely not be nominated again in its current state because nothing has changed. You'll just get the same response by the community again. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:38, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Cosa intendi nella frase "Potremmo provare a costruire sulla prosa per le partite successive agli anni 2000 prima di una rinominazione"? Dr Salvus 20:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Oh really, that was not clear? Just that maybe we could focus on building the article's text on matches that happened post-2000s where there is more source availability before renominating (and maybe that would be enough for FL) but I'm still doubtful. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Ho molti dubbi anch'io. Ti consiglio di creare una sandbox in cui scrivi come vorresti modificare l'articolo Dr Salvus 20:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Pensandoci bene penso che quello tu abbia in mente di fare non abbia molto senso poiché non sarebbe un articolo completo Dr Salvus 22:05, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Sinceramente, non ho un grande interesse per l'articolo per dedicarlo settimane di ricerca. Sono ancora qui per cose grammaticali e aiuto se trovi le fonti. Se sei interessato ad aggiornare un articolo che non dovrebbe essere troppo difficile, consulta Serie A Footballer of the Year. So che è un argomento delicato per i siciliani, ma la maggior parte del mio lavoro e interesse per WikiProject Sicily è sulla mafia. Ho ripulito molti articoli abbastanza da rimuovere i modelli "più citazioni necessarie" su di essi, ma ancora una volta, non ho la capacità di renderli molto migliori di così. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 23:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Si ti capisco. Trovare informazioni in Italia dal Canada è complicato. A questo punto ti chiedo semplicemente ti controllare errori grammaticali e le fonti Dr Salvus 05:36, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Ho deciso di aiutarti con questo articolo Serie A Footballer of the Year. Non ti arrabbiare se dovessi fare errori grammaticali Dr Salvus 13:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Ho deciso di ampliare la sezione "History" nella mia sandbox Dr Salvus 13:25, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Hey, Attualmente sto scrivendo alcune cose per Serie A Footballer of the Year emulando Serie A Coach of the Year. Cosa ne pensi di trovare fonti per i giocatori (gol segnati, statistiche del club, ecc.) Mentre scrivo? Dopo che possiamo combinare. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Possiamo anche farlo. Io non ho un inglese ottimo e dunque preferirei non scrivere testo in prosa. Hai deciso di rinunciare definitivamente a scrivere informazioni dal 2000 ad oggi su List of Coppa Italia finals Dr Salvus 15:34, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Questo articolo è molto più accessibile per raggiungere lo stato FL perché abbiamo un modello nell'articolo dell'allenatore. Ti garantisco che ce la possiamo fare. Non sono così sicuro dell'articolo di coppa e preferirei non concentrarmi troppo su qualcosa che potrebbe essere una battaglia persa. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:40, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Ho notato che questo è un FL: List of Italian football champions. (Tuttavia, le è stato assegnato questo status nel 2007, quando gli standard erano probabilmente più bassi). Poiché questo include una storia molto antica, può essere modellato per l'articolo coppa finals. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Non sei stato chiaro spiegati in inglese Dr Salvus 16:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus:Quale parte? Just that I'd rather focus time on something I know can be achieved (the footballers article over the coppa article). Second, was that List of Italian football champions is a FL article with old history so you can model it after that, but it was given this status in 2007 when the standards may have been lower. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:18, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

i spiego meglio l'accaduto in inglese. Yes, you are right but in the application some users accepted the lack of data on the spectators of the finals. If you read candidacy number 2 carefully, commentators have complained about other problems. Dr Salvus 16:36, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Ciao. Organizziamoci così: tu modifichi la mia sandbox e io aggiungo le statistiche ai vincitori del premio. Dr Salvus 07:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Ho aggiunto le statistiche per i calciatori. Completa il testo in prosa, per favore nella mia sandbox Dr Salvus 20:20, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Pensi che le fonti di questa pagina siano affidabili? Dr Salvus 13:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, sembrano affidabili. Ho usato anche sul Serie A Footballer of the Year. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:34, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

La fonte 5 ha senso di esistere? Mi intendo a questa Dr Salvus 19:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Cosa intendi "senso di esistere"? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Secondo me la fonte 5 è inopportuna per questo articolo perché non centra con l'articolo. La pensi come me? Dr Salvus 21:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Perché è un PDF? Secondo me, sembra bene. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Gela

Ciao nuovamente. Mi aiuteresti a migliorare anche questa pagina. Questa pagina fa parte del WikiProject Sicily e siccome tu partecipi a questo WikiProject penso che questa pagina porrebbe interessarti Dr Salvus 22:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Vorrei aiutare ma ho bisogno di indicazioni su quali parti aiutare. Inoltre non ho particolarmente la capacità di fare immersioni profonde nelle fonti italiane. Se lo avessi fatto, avrei fatto anche Pachino. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 23:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Non ci sono problemi per quanto riguarda le fonti poiché io sono capace di immergermi nelle fonti italiane. Ti posso aiutare anche con Pachino anche perché sono stato in questa città. I problemi sono altri come per esempio gli errori grammaticali. Sono sicuro che possiamo fare un ottimo lavoro. Dr Salvus 23:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Domanda off-topic

Ciao ti vorrei fare una domanda che non centra con Wikipedia. Tu come fai a vedere le partite della Juve e dell'Italia dal Canada? Dr Salvus 14:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Attualmente, sul TLN (TV channel) (hanno i diritti in Canada dal 2018-2021, e quindi aspettiamo chi ottiene i diritti per i prossimi tre anni). Compravamo la Rai in passato. Champions è una storia diversa poiché è su DAZN e quindi cerco di trasmetterla in streaming altrove online. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Ti spiace se partecipo al dibattito sulla Juve che è presente all'inizio della pagina di discussione? Ti avverto che sono molto chiacchierone. Dr Salvus 14:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Ahahah certo nessun problema, qualsiasi juventino è mio amico! Potrei chiederti però di provare a scrivere in inglese lì quando puoi (non preoccuparti degli errori grammaticali) perché potrei perdermi in italiano se eseguo più di poche frasi. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Ovviamente parlerò in inglese. Sarà un opportunità per migliorare il mio inglese Dr Salvus 15:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Abbandono Wikipedia in inglese

Ciao. Ho deciso di allontanarmi da Wikipedia in inglese, se vuoi sapere le cause puoi contattarmi su email. Dunque sono mortificato nel dirti che non ti aiuterò con la pagina Serie A Footballer of the Year. Ma continuerò ad aiutarti con Serie A Footballer of the Year poi basta. Grazie per la disponibilità che hai sempre dimostrato Sarò molto attivo su Wikipedia in italiano e sulla discussione sulla Juve presente in alto nella pagina di discussione. Dr Salvus 23:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Coppa di Francia

Ciao. La pagine sui turni preliminari della Coppa di Francia 2015–16, 2016–17 e 2017–18 sono troppo grandi. è stato deciso di dividere queste pagine in una per ogni girone regionale della Coppa di Francia. Io ho completato di dividere la pagina sulla competizione 2018–19 e sto terminando quella sull'edizione 2017–18. Se hai voglia (ripeto se hai voglia) potresti gentilmente aiutarmi a dividere anche le pagine sulle edizioni 2015–16 e 2016–17? Sei libero di dire "No grazie" Dr Salvus 21:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Preferirei di no. Fammi sapere se hai bisogno "copy editing" però. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Se non hai voglia ti invito però a segnare come revisionate queste pagine che creo Dr Salvus 22:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

List of Italy national football team hat-tricks

Secondo me la tabella andrebbe un po' modificata. Non mi piace molto lo stole della tabella Dr Salvus 17:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

You can modify it as you please, but I'm not too interested in making that an FL, it would be too much work. Good luck. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Ben Shapiro

Jamirowikee is at 3 reverts on a 1RR page. I alerted him to AP sanctions. Do you think he should be reported to WP:AN3 or WP:AE? Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

@Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d: I was thinking that if he did another revert. Thanks for going ahead with it. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Vaselineeeeeeee, I hadn't noticed you also made a comment about him logging while editing. It's quite obvious it's him. Just compare the IP's geolocation with Jamirowikee's edit history. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 21:43, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Looks like he just admitted to meatpuppetry Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 22:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Mafia Commission Trial/U.S. v. Salerno

I responded to your question on my talk page. Full details are over there, but the nutshell is: They might be linked, but shouldn't be merged. Lockesdonkey (talk) 00:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Copy-edit

Mi faresti un copy-edit delle seguenti pagine, per favore?

Dr Salvus 08:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

grazie mille Dr Salvus 13:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Potresti fare il copy-edit ti questa pagina Stadio Ferruccio Chittolina? Per favore se rivedi una pagina priva di errori grammaticali dimmi che non hai fatto modifiche appositamente. Grazie Dr Salvus 20:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Hey just so you know, an article that is all lead and no prose in the body, or vice versa, will not become an FL. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:34, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

What do you mean? Dr Salvus 20:35, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

The Italy hat trick article is all lead and no prose in the body. This would not meet WP:FLCR. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Ci sono 2500 caratteri di testo in prosa, come fai a dire questo? Comunque sia non è una candidatura a FL, non voglio tornare nel WP:ANI Dr Salvus 21:24, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

You stuck that all in the WP:lead. The lead is a summary. That is not WP:BODY prose. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:27, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok, tomorrow I will make the appropriate changes after reading WP: BODY. Dr Salvus 21:31, 20 April 2021 (UTC) I have read WP: LEAD. You think I split the paragraphs well, eh? Dr Salvus 06:39, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Hai letto la parte in cui si diceva che il lead dovrebbe essere lungo solo quattro paragrafi? Quello che hai scritto per la pagina delle hat-trick e della pagina coppa è una buona informazione, ma il problema è che non sono le informazioni che dovrebbero essere inserite nel lead soprattutto quando non c'è prosa nel body. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:59, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Si ma ho letto il feedback di altri utenti ed è meglio non ossessionarsi. Puoi spiegarti in inglese perché non sei chiaro Dr Salvus 21:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Could you copy-edit 2019-20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Regional Cups please? Dr Salvus 17:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Could you copy-edit Gela and Andrea Chiaramonte? Both pages aren't about football but they are about Sicily. Dr Salvus 12:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Other the small grammar points that you can go over in my edit, the ce also reduced WP:OVERLINK, added categories and added the Template:reflist, so watch out for that. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:43, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Niçard exodus and Niçard Italians

Ciao, ho creato le voci Niçard exodus e Niçard Italians: avresti tempo di darci una ripassata ? Ciao, LukeWiller (talk) 16:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC).

 Done. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Requesting review of Dan Friedkin suggested edits

Hi Vaselineeeeeeee, I saw that you had edited the Dan Friedkin page in the past, and therefore wanted to politely ask if you would be willing to review my suggested edits on the Talk:Dan Friedkin page as I have a COI given that The Friedkin Group is a client of ours.

Also, I have a question regarding changing the name of a related page that I was wondering if you might be able to shed light on. You'll notice that Gulf States Toyota Distributors is referenced multiple times on the Dan Friedkin page. The problem is that the name of the company does not actually include the word "distributors" in it, it is simply "Gulf States Toyota" as seen here in this Houston Chronical Article, "Gulf States Toyota driven to succeed." After reviewing the information on Template:Requested move it appears that I should submit the request on Talk:Gulf States Toyota Distributors, however that leads to the Talk page for The Friedkin Group because Gulf States Toyota Distributors appears to have previously been renamed to "The Friedkin Group." Therefore, I'm not sure how best to proceed. Any advice you could share would be much appreciated. Thank you for your time! CameronSays (talk) 23:29, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

@CameronSays: I changed the link to Gulf States Toyota, I also addressed your other changes on the article's talk page. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 00:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
@Vaselineeeeeeee: Thank you very much for your assistance on the Dan Friedkin page! I did notice one thing on the page though - it appears the following sentence was accidentally placed in the incorrect spot: "In 2014, Friedkin and Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation, along with other conservation organizations, made the largest conservation investment in Texas history when they purchased the 17,351-acre Powderhorn Ranch to preserve one of the largest remaining tracts of unspoiled coastal prairie in Texas." That sentence should be placed at the end of the "Personal Life" section rather than in the middle. Apologies for the inconvenience there. Also, I was wondering if you might be able to review the request I added to the Talk:Friedkin Group page. Our client would like to undo the move that was made earlier this month, as the reasoning given for that move by the editor was incorrect. Thank you again for your time, consideration and assistance with these items. CameronSays (talk) 01:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
@CameronSays: I did that for chronological purposes. 2014 came before 2019. Can you tell me how to rearrange the section so it is chronological? Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Dune aurora

Hello! Last night I made small edits in the "dune aurora" section of the Aurora article, as some facts were wrong (especially: the dune aurora discovery has nothing to do with Aurorasaurus, it was made by Finnish citizen scientists contributing to Taivaanvahti). I also slightly rephrased the theoretical explanation so that it is more accurate and flows better. I am not sure why you reverted my contribution; could you please let me know how I should have done? It does need to be corrected. Thanks! --Lvj99600 (talk) 09:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

@Lvj99600: Sorry reverted to far back. Put back. Happy editing. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

2020–21 Juventus F.C. (women) season

Could you copy-edit the article about this season of the Juventus women, please? Dr Salvus 17:00, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Macomb Michigan IP range with strange style

Someone from Macomb, Michigan, is obsessively adding their own strange typographic style to hundreds of articles. They capitalize too much, use single quotes for nicknames, and add unreferenced/uncredited roles to film cast lists.

You've reverted this person a few times.[5][6][7]

Is there a way to communicate with them and ask them to change? I have not seen any response to talk page warnings. Binksternet (talk) 04:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

@Binksternet: It looks like I did warn the IP that I had reverted once. Not sure what to make of the global IP address. You should probably make this situation known to the relevant admins. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 13:15, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Question

Would it bother if someday I will ask you to sign as patrolled some of my creations? Dr Salvus 10:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, I've already said that that's fine. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 13:19, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Oh, I forgot. At this point could you please mark as revised 2019-20 Juventus F.C. Under-23 season? Dr Salvus 13:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC) Can you patrol Rocco Costantino? Dr Salvus 18:31, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Please, patrol + copy-edit of Giovanni Goccione Dr Salvus 21:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Please mark as patrolled Template:Supercoppa Italiana (women) Dr Salvus 21:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thank you for your Copy-edits and new page patrols. Much appreciated! Dr Salvus 20:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

The article is too big

The article is more than 150,000 bytes big! We should split it according to the guideline.--Sakiv (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

@Sakiv: Would you like to help me split it properly such as in Italy national football team results such that it is not a partial split? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 03:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Sure :) But do we use the football box template?--Sakiv (talk) 03:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
@Sakiv: Yeah for sure, I think using collapsible tables is even against policy due to accessibility so. What is the best way to approach this? I notice that the match reports are not currently used so we'll have to find those. Do you have a reliable site to find these? Maybe I can work on pre-1990, and you do the rest? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 03:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Great, I agree with you on the distribution of work and necessity of using templates instead of tables. I found this site that contains the details we need.--Sakiv (talk) 03:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
@Sakiv: Ok great thanks. I'll probably get started tomorrow. Sorry for being a little hostile in the beginning. This was actually something I have been meaning to get to, so didn't just want there to be a partial split especially if the info was duplicated on a page that really should be split fully. Now that we can split the work, it should be good. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 03:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you, I understand your reaction. We can start quickly but I think we have to agree on the result timeframe. Canada only played about 40 matches before 1980 but from 1980 to 1990 played more than 80 matches. The time period 1924–1979 and 1980–1990 would be good for you to work on.--Sakiv (talk) 03:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
@Sakiv: Yes, I was thinking that as well. I think we should do Canada men's national soccer team results (1924–1977), Canada men's national soccer team results (1980–1999) and Canada men's national soccer team results (2000–2019). I will work in my User:Vaselineeeeeeee/sandbox where I will put my half of 1980–1999. I think the 19 year intervals are good better than 10 year intervals. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 04:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Okay, that's great :)--Sakiv (talk) 04:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
@Sakiv: I have created all the split pages seen here: Canada men's national soccer team results. I have finished 1924–1977. Will work on my half of 1980–1999 in a bit. Let me know if you'll still be on track. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Sorry but I thought we would both create our pages when they were complete. I think you made a mistake when you copied and pasted the content of the large page to create the three articles. This can be used as an argument to override templates and replace them with unhelpful tables. I'm still working on the 2000-2019 page and I'm close to finishing half of it.--Sakiv (talk) 17:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
@Sakiv: Excellent! I just wanted to get everything in order for the new pages. The two pages (1980-1999) and (2000-2019) have the tables in them from the main page for now, until you are ready to replace them with the football boxes. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
@Sakiv: Hi! Not sure if you just haven't included them yet, but remember to include the goalscorers and the reports to the football boxes! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:35, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
@Sakiv: Just an update that I've finished my half at Canada men's national soccer team results (1980–1999). I will now continue on with the unofficial matches. Let me know if you need any help. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Good job. You may add the reports if you want.--Sakiv (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
@Sakiv: Thanks. I'll let you finish adding all your remaining results for 2014–19 and 1990–99 then I'll help by adding the reports and goalscorers if you haven't done so already. Thanks, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 23:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
@PKT: If you're at all interested in helping with adding match reports to the 2000s page, please feel free to help User:Sakiv and I. Have a good one, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, There is a user who is replacing the content of articles with obsolete tables instead of Football box collapsible templates. He did so in a recent Argentina and Brazil articles. I think the templates look more informative and easy to read. Can we cooperate to change that?--Sakiv (talk) 16:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
@Sakiv: I can't do anything about that, but it looks like a WP:LOCALCONSENSUS to me that is a WT:FOOTY issue. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
That's what I meant. We can bring up the topic on the WikiProject to get an outright consensus.--Sakiv (talk) 21:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi @Sakiv: just checking in to see what the timeline is for finishing off the remainder of your part here? Thanks, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 12:42, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

James Gandolfini

Hi, I have no idea if I'm doing this correctly, please forgive me if so.

In relation to the James Gandolfini page. I know it comes across as a bit trivial, but his middle name is noted as "John" on the funeral program that can be found quite easily by Google search. I know you refer to the NYT source, but I am unable to read that given the need for a subscription.

I just wonder if there is any way the funeral program could be considered a suitable source, as I would hope his name would be noted correctly on that? I would share on here, if I knew how!

Thanks for your time.

Edit: perhaps this link will work - https://heavy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/program.jpg

Thanks for this. I have added the comment at Talk:James Gandolfini#Middle name. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


Thank you ever so much for taking this into consideration. The discrepancy is quite strange, as you would hope an obituary in NYT would have researched a name properly, and I've seen the funeral card photos floating around for years and it certainly looks legitimate. I remember years ago (I believe he was still alive at the time), he was referred to as "James R Gandolfini". No idea where that came from.

Ryerson

Where is the talk page you mentioned? Shouldn't the church mentioned have the right to delete this link? Mkooiman (talk) 21:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Open a discussion here Talk:Egerton Ryerson. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:37, 10 June 2021 (UTC)


Invitation to talk

Hi

I just created a new talk for the page Italy national football team and you're invited to discuss. As a recurrent contributor, any of your feedback will be appreciated.

thanks in advance

Riktetta (talk) 07:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Sofia Cantore and Angelica Soffia

Hello, can you copy-edit these articles, please? Please, discard the email I've sent you today Dr Salvus 10:28, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Please, can you patrol U.C. Sampdoria (women)? Dr Salvus 17:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Giampiero Boniperti

On 19 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Giampiero Boniperti, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) PFHLai I was a candidate of the ITN recognition. Dr Salvus 09:55, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Vandalismi

Ciao, ho un problema con un IP che annulla continuamente alcuni miei edit (anche su altre voci: Pula, Dubrovnik, Zadar e Split, Croatia, mentre altre come Šibenik, Rijeka e Kotor, le lascia per ora stare). Io però conosco poco le policy di Wikipedia in inglese (non saprei cosa scrivere nel campo oggetto dei miei revert): te ne potresti occupare tu ? Andrebbero annullati i suoi revert. Se mettessi tutte queste voci nella tua watch list mi faresti un piacere. Ti ringrazio in anticipo. --LukeWiller (talk) 08:53, 30 June 2021 (UTC).

@LukeWiller: Ciao. Ho revert e li ho aggiunti alla mia watchlist per 30 giorni. La fonte è affidabile. L'IP ti ha revert solo una volta su ciascuna delle pagine, ma se l'IP continua, intraprenderò l'azione successiva. Saluti, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 13:51, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Ok, grazie mille... :-) Ciao, --LukeWiller (talk) 16:25, 30 June 2021 (UTC).
Ti segnalo questa mia aggiunta: ho cambiato la fonte, adesso va bene. Ciao, --LukeWiller (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC).

What is this association of Italians against others on the English wikipedia, for this you need to be banned 93.138.190.221 (talk) 17:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

@LukeWiller: L'ho revert in base alla tua nuova fonte. Non ho fatto una revisione delle fonti sulla tua richiesta iniziale, ma assicurati che le città a cui stai aggiungendo queste informazioni siano menzionate nella fonte data. IP: If you want anything translated, let us know. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:32, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
It should be written in English here, because this is an English wikipedia. And stop working together against others on wikipedia, because that’s not fair of you. 93.138.190.221 (talk) 17:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
@LukeWiller: All I can say is since you were the one who added the content that is being reverted, per WP:BRD you should use the article talk page to discuss why you think this source and info are necessary. Thanks, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I have read the discussion on all the pages on which it took place: it is still controversial, and I do not know the English Wikipedia policies so well as to open (and continue) a discussion in the talk of the article. Thanks for the help anyway. --LukeWiller (talk) 21:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC).
I owe you an apology for involving you in this matter: from now on I will deal with non-controversial topics. Sorry again. LukeWiller (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2021 (UTC).
@LukeWiller: Non preoccuparti. Felice di cercare di aiutare con qualsiasi questione. Se gli sforzi vengono accolti con qualche respingimento, allora sappiamo che qualcosa deve essere rivisto. Saluti, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:13, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Codogné

Hi Vaselineeeeeee. You can speak both English and Italian, right? Maybe a comment from you could give a push to a discussion that's currently still, if you're interested in sharing your opinion: [8] 5.170.45.164 (talk) 10:01, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

I won't take part in the matter but maybe User:IvanScrooge98 will because I know he has been part of accent discussion before. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:10, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Flag of Italy and Flags of Napoleonic Italy

Ciao, avrei bisogno che dessi una rilettura al paragrafo National flags similar to the flag of Italy della voce "Flag of Italy" e alla voce Flags of Napoleonic Italy. Grazie in anticipo. LukeWiller (talk) 21:18, 13 July 2021 (UTC).

@LukeWiller: Non ho riscontrato problemi con la prima sezione. Il secondo articolo è ora modificato. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Ok, grazie, alla prossima. Ciao, --LukeWiller (talk) 16:33, 15 July 2021 (UTC).

Sala del Tricolore, Cockade of Italy and a chapter of Flags of Napoleonic Italy

Ciao, avrei bisogno che dessi una rilettura alla voce Sala del Tricolore, alla voce Cockade of Italy e al paragrafo The premises della voce "Flags of Napoleonic Italy". Grazie in anticipo. --LukeWiller (talk) 19:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC).

@LukeWiller: Ciao, ho riletto la sala e 'the premises', ma prima di rileggere l'articolo lungo sulla cockade, ci saranno altre grosse modifiche? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 00:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
No, non preoccuparti: sulla cockade ho finito. --LukeWiller (talk) 16:18, 2 August 2021 (UTC).

Dangling ref

Hi Vaselineeeeeeee, I have been working on fixing dangling references that have no corresponding sources, and it appears you added a ref to Al Martino in this edit. Do you know the source? For now, I have hidden the ref. Let me know if you need any assistance if you do know the source! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 08:18, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

@Aussie Article Writer: Hi, yes the book was from The Godfather article. I just added it to Al Martino. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 12:41, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 13:02, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey, sorry to be a pain, do you have a reference for Hazzard & Gould 2005 and Tranfaglia & Zunino 1998 on Agnelli family? I've marked the spots where I've hidden the references. Thanks so much again! You are doing great work, keep it up! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 06:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

@Aussie Article Writer: No worries! I got the sources from Juventus F.C. and History of Juventus F.C. I tried to fix the cites at Agnelli family and these two articles, but I keep getting an error, can you please fix them? Thanks, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:05, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
No probs, I’ll have a look. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 14:32, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
All fixed! Thanks for locating that citation. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 14:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Aussie Article Writer: Thanks! Can you also please fix them at the two pages linked above? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Fixed :-) you can’t put {{sfn}} in ref tags, also when you have second author make the parameters first1 last1 first2 last2, etc. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 11:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Serie A Footballer of the Year FLC

Hi Vaselineeeeeeee. The FLC had been active for over four months, which is much longer than we'd like to see FLCs last, and there wasn't any sign of further support coming. One support by itself isn't enough to say there was a consensus for promotion; typically us closers would like to see at least three supports. give or take, and it didn't look like that was going to happen in a reasonable time frame here. Unfortunately, we can't leave FLCs open indefinitely, so I felt like archiving the FLC was the correct decision. Given that you've addressed the feedback from the first FLC, I don't think anyone would have any objections if you were to re-nominate the list. If you do so (and I hope you will), I wish you the best of luck and hope you get more reviewer attention. Cheers. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

@Giants2008: Thank you for this explanation. I have done so. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 13:38, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Order of Merit of the Italian Republic

Hi, the IP seems to be correct in changing the classes from 5th/6th to 4th/5th, at least, according to Order of Merit of the Italian Republic. Nehme1499 14:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

@Nehme1499: Thanks. I see I was mistaken in considering the "Knight Grand Cross with Collar" as the first class, but it seems the class system starts with the second order of merit. I will fix this for the team members. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Byron Moreno

Hi! I noticed you keep reverting my edits. May I ask why? IdkImNotCreative (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@IdkImNotCreative: Hi. Because they are WP:unsourced and introduce WP:POV. You don't use air quotes on an encyclopedia. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

A thousand apologies. Apart from that, may I keep my edits? I feel like what I edited is shared by many people and is official. IdkImNotCreative (talk) 14:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

I think that many people believe what I edited was true, and even though I don’t share the experience you have, I believe we can correct my formal mistakes and compromise IdkImNotCreative (talk) 14:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@IdkImNotCreative: Well no, because it still introduces WP:POV. Please review some of the welcome links on your talk page that will allow you to become more familiar with how we edit here. Thanks, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:40, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I shall review the policies and edit with a new heart. May I ask you an irrelevant question? IdkImNotCreative (talk) 14:43, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

I edited it following the desired instructions. I hope I’ve done well. IdkImNotCreative (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Byron Moreno consensus

Hi, by my edits I was hoping to change the way the article was written because I think it has some subliminal messages. For instance, I was attempting to edit how the offside is described, because many people agree it wasn’t offside, whilst that article bit makes it look like it was offside . So I wanted to add a part that said that it probably wasn’t. Same for the dive. Lastly, I also wanted to report the fact about the fouls. I hope we can compromise, tell me your opinion. IdkImNotCreative (talk) 15:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Please move this to the talk page of Moreno. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

I might want to mention that I obviously don’t go by my opinion alone, as I follow what many respectable people say. About the fouls, I wanted to mention the fact that they weren’t reported, but all in good spirit. I do not intend to change it into my perspective, just what the majority agrees to. Thanks for reading. IdkImNotCreative (talk) 15:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Oh sorry, will do. IdkImNotCreative (talk) 15:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

I added the convo to the Byron Moreno talk page IdkImNotCreative (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for having caused trouble to you by our discussion IdkImNotCreative (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Removed your auto-archiving settings

Hi! I've removed the auto-archiving settings from the top of this page, because they weren't working and it looks like you're manually archiving anyway. If you'd like to set up automatic archiving anyway, I'd suggest you copy the code at User:Lowercase_sigmabot_III/Archive_HowTo#Example_2:_Incremental_archives (and set the counter to 17). If you have any questions, let me know! --rchard2scout (talk) 13:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Archive 10 ← Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vaselineeeeeeee/Archive_17&oldid=1042934017"