User talk:Vadim Kiev

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Vadim Kiev, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chastushka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''Chastúshka''' ({{lang-ru|часту́шка}}, {{IPA-ru|ʧɪsˈtuʂkə|pron}}, derives from "части́ть" - old word, that means '

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverts of Dacha[edit]

Before you get yourself into trouble, please get yourself familiar with wikipedia rules WP:CITE and WP:CIVILITY. - Altenmann >t 22:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CITE#Dealing_with_unsourced_material: If an article is unreferenced, you can tag it with the "unreferenced" template Vadim Kiev (talk) 12:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint that you are edit warring at Dacha[edit]

Please see a complaint about your edits here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Vadim Kiev reported by User:Altenmann (Result: ). Though you might be adding correct information, you have not provided any sources. Your information can't remain in Wikipedia if there is no publication where it can be confirmed. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 23:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anything that has no reliable source can be removed. The fact that nobody noticed it before does not decide the matter. You have continued to revert even after getting reported at WP:AN3, so any administrator could now decide to block your account. You might still be able to avoid that if you undo your last change at Dacha. EdJohnston (talk) 18:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CITE#Dealing_with_unsourced_material: If an article is unreferenced, you can tag it with the "unreferenced" template Vadim Kiev (talk) 12:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:36, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict in Dacha[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Dacha. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, WP:edit warring and ad hominem attacks on opponents will lead you to a block in a matter of hours. Find and demonstrate sources for your stuff before reverting other guys. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:25, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Vadim Kiev. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:03, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Dacha, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism is disruptive. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. If you continue to label Altenmann's edits as vandalism, things will go poorly for you at ANI. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Dacha shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My contribution is being attacked by user Altenmann[edit]

Info I have about him:

Altenmann is a long-time editor who became an admin. He used multiple sockpuppets to influence discussions, was discovered, and was desysoped and banned from editing. He requested a lifting of the ban, which was granted by ArbCom after community discussion, but was restricted to one account.

[1].

The easiest (and really, only) way to stop the deletions and tagging is to add reliable sources to the articles. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page edits, as you did at Talk:Dacha, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Dascha. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 21:24, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Baba (slavic word)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Baba (slavic word). Since you had some involvement with the Baba (slavic word) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:45, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]