User talk:Utter Donkey

December 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Force has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Force was changed by Utter Donkey (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869745 on 2020-12-21T10:47:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Utter Donkey, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Utter Donkey! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

February 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Beverley Callard have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Beverley Callard was changed by Utter Donkey (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869048 on 2021-02-21T12:00:59+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Beverley Callard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Suonii180 (talk) 12:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Your recent editing history at YouTube shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae In 2015, Google restructured itself, in which Alphabet inc. became the parent company of Google and several other subsidiaries including YouTube. Utter Donkey (talk) 23:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, YouTube remains a subsidiary of Google. Please stop edit warring. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 01:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See, for example, the description here about the new organizational structure. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 01:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Inverkeithing High School, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 12:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Isabelle Belato There are many sources, I happen to go to the school. here are some sources: https://www.dunfermlinepress.com/news/20101558.rosyth-fife-council-insist-new-high-school-on-track/ https://www.fife.gov.uk/kb/docs/articles/education2/managing-our-school-estate/latest-news

Are those sources reliable enough? Utter Donkey (talk) 12:41, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems so. Just remember to add them to the article. Thanks. Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 12:44, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Griffpatch for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Griffpatch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griffpatch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🦁⋆JennilyW♡🦌 (talk) 01:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JennilyW what policies or guidelines do you believe it to violate? Utter Donkey (talk) 09:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ingore that message, I missed the article explaining it Utter Donkey (talk) 09:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Novem Linguae. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Maritime pilot have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]