User talk:Unitrin

Hello!

Test[edit]

Test 123 abcdefghijklmnop

Test 2[edit]

asdf

January 2011[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Esther Schapira. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:00, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not poorly referenced, nor controversial, sorry but you are incorrect. Unitrin (talk) 18:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Esther Schapira. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are wrong. The information is referenced properly and it's not controversial. You need to read the Discussion page and contribute to the discussion if you can. You have not made your case, please explain why it's controversial and/or not properly sourced and stop attacking me with threats. Thanks.Unitrin (talk) 20:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unitrin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

False accusation, personal attack by one rogue admn. named "Jayjg". Nobody on Wikipedia has ever once had a problem with ANY of my edits, as my talk page shows, never. Thanks. Unitrin (talk) 06:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Hello, User:Soledad22. sockpuppet accounts aren't generally unblocked; if you think you've solved all of the problems that made your original block necessary, you should request the unblocking of your original account. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:05, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unitrin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not sockpuppet account, false accusation Unitrin (talk) 15:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"The evidence before the Court is/ Incontrovertible; there's no need for the jury to retire ... — Daniel Case (talk) 15:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.