User talk:Uncle G's major work 'bot

Notices
I am a 'bot. I do not have a "new messages" bar to light up.
You may also talk to my owner.
You may send mail to me, too. But please don't unless there is an emergency. Use a talk page.

May I pick your bot nit, please[edit]

I believe such a piece of (solely) software should be called a bot, not a 'bot (just my nit-picky opinion as a computer science major). --IByte 22:45, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is a automated to all bot operators[edit]

Please take a few moments and fill in the data for your bot on Wikipedia:Bots/Status Thank you Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated message to bot owners[edit]

As a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy:

Until new bots are accepted they should wait 30-60 seconds between edits, so as to not clog the recent changes list and user watchlists. After being accepted and a bureaucrat has marked them as a bot, they can edit at a much faster pace. Bots doing non-urgent tasks should edit approximately once every ten seconds, while bots who would benefit from faster editing may edit approximately once every every four seconds.

Also, to eliminate the need to spam the bot talk pages, please add Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard to your watchlist. Future messages which affect bot owners will be posted there. Thank you. --Mets501 05:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 1980 Marathon Year Ranking, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling back[edit]

Good morning, Uncle G's major work 'bot! Thanks for all the hard work you've done. :D I've spent about an hour unblanking articles so far that have already been cleared at CCI, and I just wanted you (and, more specifically, any others who visit the page) to know that I'm switching to rollback simply to save my poor wrists from disability. I am only rolling back blanking on articles that have already been checked and cleared. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:11, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The best idea is probably to contact Uncle G, the owner of the bot itself. Hey Mid (contributions) 17:16, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

U r ruining wikipedia[edit]

just kidding!!!!!!!!!!! u r doing a good job! :-D --Bad edits r dumb (talk) 03:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Verné Lesche[edit]

Hi,

Would it be too much to ask exactly who's copyright is supposed to be infringed? Perhaps that site is quoting from wikipedia itself.Dirk P Broer (talk) 11:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Agree with Dirk P. This is a very generic and bland article with very general results! Misterfrisky (talk) 18:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stub categories[edit]

When dealing with copyvio pages, please don't replace stub tags with stub categories. Instead, please either leave the stub tag, or remove the stub category entirely. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And please also leave {{DEFAULTSORT}}s alone. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]