User talk:Uajii

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shin Dong-Il has been accepted

Shin Dong-Il, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 06:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Marketa Lazarová into Marketa Lazarová (soundtrack). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 01:36, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cinema of the Czech Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ecstasy and Dalibor

Jan Kříženecký (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Director and Czech

Elektafilm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Magic House

Workers, Let's Go (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jaroslav Ježek

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jan Kačer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Federal Assembly

The Joke (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Most

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:59, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Hello, I'm Dl2000. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pohádka máje, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Arrival from the Darkness

Hello, Uajii,

Thank you for creating The Arrival from the Darkness.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Some sources for the cast section would be nice, even if it is a reused cite

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nezlobte dědečka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eman Fiala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

The Girl from Beskydy Mountains moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Girl from Beskydy Mountains, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 21:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Girl from Beskydy Mountains has been accepted

The Girl from Beskydy Mountains, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Return of the Prodigal Son (1966 film)

The article The Return of the Prodigal Son (1966 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References not available. No significant coverage to meet the notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The9Man | (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Divotvorný klobouk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Theodor Pištěk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Josef Auerbach and Julius Schmitt in Rome (1925).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Josef Auerbach and Julius Schmitt in Rome (1925).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Jiří Procházka (fighter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jiří Procházka (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiří Procházka (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cassiopeia^(talk) 05:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josef Augusta (paleontologist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gambrinus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilsen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Barrandov logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Barrandov logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

May 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 00:41, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello, I'm Flibirigit. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bohumil Modrý, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flibirigit (talk) 01:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Funny that you had no problem with the original article horribly written and full of misinformation, but me editing it is a problem. You could have just added "citation needed" or "more sources needed" message, instead of removing the article. I will not be adding the sources, because I'm done with the article. I had plans to add more information later, but seeing there are people like you who destroy other people's edits, I have no interest now. Uajii (talk) 02:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Patrik Vydra

Hello Uajii, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Patrik Vydra, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrik Vydra.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

@North8000: Hello, I wanted to let you to know, that your actions are embarrassing. Patrik Vydra is a football player playing for the leading club of Czech Football League. He played in Europa League and for the U21 Czech National Team. If that's not notable enough, you should probably delete about 10,000 Wikipedia articles about various sportspeople, who are representing their countries at the highest level. You see, there are two types of people: Those, who create and those, who destroy. Guess to which category you belong to. A person from the first category would look at the article and if he found it insufficient he would try to improve it. Not you, though. You'd rather waste everyone's time by starting a debate, whether the article should be deleted. ~~~~ Uajii (talk) 03:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

You have a mis-impression about what wp:notability is about....suggest reading WP:Notability . It's about having sources that cover him in depth. Your best course of action would be to find and include 1 or 2 or such sources which would settle the whole thing. Doing New Page Patrol job properly includes implementing that and sending articles that don't appear to meet that criteria for further review at AFD. And new page patrol consists of about 30 active reviewers trying to review about 600 new articles per day in their available wiki-minutes. And a part of the reason that it's only 30 is because of people like you flaming NPP reviewers for attempting to do their job properly. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 14:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wilma Neruda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC)