User talk:Troiaeye

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Troiaeye. You have new messages at KaySL's talk page.
Message added 14:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

KaySL (talk) 17:49, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Troiaeye. You have new messages at KaySL's talk page.
Message added 09:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Troiaeye. You have new messages at KaySL's talk page.
Message added 18:02, 29 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

See also removed[edit]

Hi, I removed your see also link to Ohio River Trail from the See also section of Pine Creek Rail Trail as I could see absolutely no connection between the two articles (they are in totally different watersheds and do not and would not connect in any way, that I can see) and I failed to see how the link was justified under WP:See also. If you can explain the connection, please do so on my talk page, Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 15:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. I see that there is no mention of the Pine Creek Rail Trail in the Ohio River Trail article. If it is such a significant outing, why not include it in that article (ORT)? I think that what might work better is to have a "Rail trails in Pennsylvania" nav box, much like {{PennsylvaniaTrails}} - see its use in West Rim Trail. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I made {{PennsylvaniaRailtrails}} and added it to all articles in the category. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 16:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea! Thanks.

Troiaeye (talk) 20:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Troiaeye. You have new messages at KaySL's talk page.
Message added 00:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ohio River Trail

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_River_Trail

Please add the following additional references for the Ohio River Trail National Park Service grant:

http://www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/rtca/whatwedo/projects/PA.pdf

http://www.ohiorivertrail.org/attachments/124_ORTC_NPS%20Press%20Release%20January%2018,%202011.pdf

http://www.ohiorivertrail.org/attachments/161_ORTC_National%20Park%20Service%20RTCA%20Grant%202010.pdf

http://www.ohiorivertrail.org/attachments/124_Ohio%20River%20Trail%20Council%20gets%20assistance%20from%20feds.pdf

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_718766.html

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11020/1119249-57.stm

http://www.friendsoftheriverfront.org/misc_docs/Riverfront%20Report%202010%20Web.pdf

http://www.ohiorivertrail.org/attachments/124_ORTC_Monaca%20EPA%20Press%20Release%20February%202,%202011.pdf

http://www.ohiorivertrail.org/attachments/124_Ohio%20River%20Trail%20Council%20gets%20assistance%20from%20feds.pdf

Thanks,

Troiaeye (talk) 02:16, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure I understand why I am supposed to add these to the article - it is not protected, so is there some reason why you cannot? Ruhrfisch ><>°° 15:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was just asking for your assistance. Unfortunately, I not aware of the proper code to accomplish the task. If you point me in the right direction, I will be able to edit properly.

Thanks,

Troiaeye (talk) 13:18, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ohio River Trail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harmony Township, Pennsylvania. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ohio River Water Trail (October 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Troiaeye, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 13:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ohio River Water Trail has been accepted[edit]

Ohio River Water Trail, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Yann (talk) 18:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Troiaeye. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Troiaeye. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox water trail[edit]

Template:Infobox water trail has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]