User talk:Tototo30

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tototo30. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 04:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article in under-served area[edit]

I thought the article, Addis Ababa–Djibouti Railway, that you initiated and nurtured is nicely written and balanced. Also, African commercial issues are somewhat under-served in Wikipedia and media in general. So big thanks and hope to see more of your articles!--Rpclod (talk) 16:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Business and Economics Barnstar
		Great article on Addis Ababa–Djibouti Railway! Rpclod (talk) 16:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Bactrian Camel[edit]

Hi, Tototo30! I had to revert your 4 recent edits to the above article. Firstly, your mention of the "Protected Area" should not be used as part of the name of the Gobi. Your zealous desire to protect this area shouldn't be reflected in the wording of your edit. This is called WP:Neutral point of view or NPOV. Second, if you think you have found a better source for information in the article, be sure to discuss it on the article's Talk page before making the ref change. Thirdly,removing the reference to Kum Tagh and the funding should first be discussed on the Talk page for the article beforehand. Fourthly, Wikipedia's style standards dictate that, in an article about a species, it is preferable to refer to the species in the singular (e.g., "killing the camel by laying land mines"). Lastly, kindly leave an Edit summary for your edits to WP: Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

An edit summary is very helpful to your fellow Wikipedia editors!--Quisqualis (talk) 21:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your criticisms do not apply to the edits that I have made.

I did not use the words "Protected Area" "as part of the name of the Gobi." I have changed the link to Great Gobi A Strictly Protected Area. This is not the entire Gobi Desert, just the part that has been set aside as a nature reserve for the camels. This makes the sentence more consistent, since the first half of the sentence already refers to the Lop Nur Wild Camel National Nature Reserve (not the entire Lop Nur).

I did not change a reference to a better source of information for the article. The same source was being linked in two different citations, and I have combined them.

It is not necessary to discuss the removal of dollar amounts on the Talk page. Individual grants are trivia and not encyclopedic. They also make the sentence very awkward.

Including the location also makes the sentence awkward. The Lop Nur Wild Camel National Nature Reserve has its own article. It has a map that shows its boundaries and location.

The Wikipedia manual of style does not say that the singular form should always be used for species. The name of the species is singular. Most other references are plural. The plural form outnumbers the singular form in wildlife articles. Here are three examples out of millions:

- "Whaling is a method of hunting whales for their meat ..."
- "... the increased hunting of wildlife, including pandas ..."
- "Dugongs have historically provided easy targets for hunters, who killed them for their meat, oil, skin, and bones."

I am reapplying all changes, with edit summaries.

Tototo30 (talk) 19:23, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lagos–Kano Standard Gauge Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agbado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cape to Cairo Railway[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cape_to_Cairo_Railway&action=history

A while ago you removed a false statement in the first paragraph from this page stating something like "The Cape to Cairo Railway is a railway line that crosses Africa...". It's back. I'm no expert at Wikipedia but it looks to have been replaced by the same user who initially wrote it - Hallel. I have put an explanation in the talk page why I think that it is a falsehood. You may know better than I what is best to do about it.

Chris.Bristol (talk) 00:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC) First paragraph corrected and article moved to a more appropriate name. Chris.Bristol (talk) 14:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]