User talk:Toni is here

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've removed the charts you added to Wind It Up (Gwen Stefani song). Wikipedia:Record charts recommends not using any more than 18 chart positions, so unofficial charts and charts for very minor music markets such as Slovenia or Croatia should not be included. ShadowHalo 03:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add chart trajectories to articles. For more information, see Wikipedia:Record charts. ShadowHalo 13:39, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the RIAA certification you added awhile ago. RIAA's database doesn't mention it, so you'll need to introduce a source if you want to add it back in. ShadowHalo 04:26, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Gwen Stefani discography. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ShadowHalo 15:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to Gwen Stefani discography, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. ShadowHalo 19:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding your comment, it does not matter if RIAA does not list the certification in their database. The information should either be referenced or not included at all. ShadowHalo 20:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Sweet Escape, you will be blocked from editing. ShadowHalo 01:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by continuing to re-add unsourced content despite warnings, and posting abusive talk page msgs. Blocked for 24 hrs. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org.

Edits like this will not be tolerated. UkPaolo/talk 10:12, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Come on I Was angry because he removed all of the contents i submited... i promise it won't happen again

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Toni is here for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ShadowHalo 20:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours for using the account User:Toni thebest to evade your previous block. While you are blocked, you should not edit Wikipedia under any user name or IP address. Please see the sock puppetry case linked above for evidence. If you believe this block is unjustified you may appeal by placing the text {{unlblock|your reason here}} on this talk page. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:32, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Croatian Top 20 Chart. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatian Top 20 Chart. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]