User talk:Tobyspinks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfD nomination of Roberto De Luna[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Roberto De Luna, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto De Luna. Thank you. Pastordavid (talk) 17:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing a good job with referencing. Try to use any verifiable sources you know of to validate the article and put as footnotes. Learn how to format the latter properly, as it adds credibility. Also have a go at editing some other articles to build up experience. Tyrenius (talk) 03:28, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was in the middle of pontificating on the AfD page for this article when it got deleted. I thought I would post my thoughts here since they may be some use. The article was basicaly a Résumé in its current form, it listed acomplishments but failed to state in intro the main notability of the artist (why should we know about this guy?). Wikipedia policy is not "keep it" and try to find a reason to - policy is "if it dosn't pass varification, delete it". I was weak on delete because there was some minor inference that this artist is notable in a sub-section of the arts community (LGBT). A better article would have very little (if any) commercial exhibition history and much more cited third party critical information as to where this artists fits in the art world. Just some thoughts, Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 23:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Guide to referencing[edit]

Click on "show" to open contents.

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Roberto De Luna.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Roberto De Luna.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:16, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]