User talk:Tigerdude9/Archive03

March 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at EgyptAir Flight 990, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 01:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Don't change maintenance tags to newer dates - the whole point is to see how long something has gone un-addressed. And please don't introduce bad grammar into articles. Acroterion (talk) 23:07, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

"Anyways" is not a word, you know. Acroterion (talk) 23:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Don't reinstate grammatical hash and fix it later. Either fix it or leave the article alone. Acroterion (talk) 03:06, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

And it's "grammar," not "grammer." Acroterion (talk) 03:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Saudia Flight 163, you may be blocked from editing. Samf4u (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Tigerdude9, I'm going to ask you once again to provide an edit summary for all your edits. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 01:27, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Uncontrolled decompression. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:21, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

More unsourced changes [1].--Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Aviation accidents and incidents. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Geogene (talk) 02:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

For issuing an ultimatum on the MH17 talk page [2] and subsequently edit warring content [3] against clearly stated talk page consensus. Geogene (talk) 02:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

You've finally got me. Tigerdude9 (talk) 16:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Yemenia Flight 626. This is the unsourced change. Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I re-did the edits and THIS time I cited the info. Tigerdude9 (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

File:PR-GTD at GIG.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vuelo 11 de Avianca

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vuelo 11 de Avianca, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that has essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:18, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HS-TIA at Bangkok Suvarnabhumi Airport in 1997.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:HS-TIA at Bangkok Suvarnabhumi Airport in 1997.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 03:35, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Dominicana DC-9 air disaster

Please read this[4]. Your page move and changes to the article are incorrect. There is no WP:RS saying the flight number was 603. Just a blogspot blog. This article was corrected one time already and if you had bothered to read the page history, you would have known that....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

I just found more firm proof from what you told me to read, and you might have seen this before: http://www.timetableimages.com/i-df/do7009a.jpg It's from the actual airline, except no one weighed in on this.

Did you bother to read the post I linked to above? That image is mentioned but the page move approved. That the flight was numbered 603 months after the crash DOESN'T mean that was the number of the crashed plane....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC) Okay fine you are right, (and yes I did read the post). I apologize, I really do. Tigerdude9 (talk) 22:38, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Thai Airways International Flight 261

A tag has been placed on Draft:Thai Airways International Flight 261 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Article already exists. Why the draft page.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:06, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aeroflot Flight 593 (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aeroflot Flight 593 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aeroflot Flight 593, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 00:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Tigerdude9! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 00:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

About your recent edit

There is consensus to remove such statements from articles. If you don't have a source, it is original research. You may want to see this conversation: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Aviation accident task force/Archive 6#Willy waving. Don't worry, I made the same mistake as you before. funplussmart (talk) 12:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

And yes I am taking about this edit: [5] funplussmart (talk) 12:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

I read the page as well as WP:TRIVIA. It says trivia is usually not reccomended, but it can be added if necessary. However, it states that if trivia is added, it should not be in a separate paragraph (I can read a bit too fast sometimes, so sorry if i missed anything that is important). Tigerdude9 (talk) 13:13, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop trying to add this kind of thing [6] into articles. You've been told that it doesn't represent consensus, and your edit summary makes it clear that you're ignoring consensus and advice. Please don't do that again - you're moving into disruptive editing. Acroterion (talk) 16:38, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

I'm aware that I have been warned and I've even read the guidelines on trivia. In fact I added this king of thing last week, but I changed my mind and undid it. Look this was in the MH370 article and I thought it would work here. I'm sorry, and I will (hopefully) not do it again, not on this article at least. Tigerdude9 (talk) 17:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Then stop doing it, here and elsewhere. You're testing the boundaries. I have experience in working with autistic editors and understand that you may need to be told things like this more than once, and that you may not recognize that your edits aren't appropriate, but it doesn't give you a free pass. You're entitled to patience, but not indulgence. So please, don't keep inserting air disaster rankings, hoping that your edits will stick. Acroterion (talk) 03:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

FA

Don't tag articles that haven't passed featured article review as featured articles. That's not an action that can be done as a drive-by edit - anything higher than B class requires a process. Acroterion (talk) 02:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

What is the process and how do I do it? Tigerdude9 (talk) 16:31, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

See WP:FA - it involves extensive review by editors with experience in featured article writing and in the manuals of style - it's not a simple or easy process. You aren't experienced enough to undertake such work. Acroterion (talk) 03:40, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Oh no. I wish you had told me earlier, because I already submitted it (I read the steps at least). Tigerdude9 (talk) 21:34, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Image uploads

If you upload another non-free image I will block you. Please stop doing things that you clearly know are wrong and then seeking permission or forgiveness, and please stop using autism as an excuse. We're being patient, but there are limits. Acroterion (talk) 02:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Ok, I actually got scared. However Non-free images where I DO have permission to use them is an exception though! Tigerdude9 (talk) 03:02, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, but you don't. Don't upload non-free images without explicit permissions that we can verify. It's that simple. Don't get scared, just don't upload pictures that you didn't take and you'll be fine. Don't try again and expect a different outcome. Acroterion (talk) 03:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Well I just uploaded two images of 9M-MRO's interior that I did not take. The images were found on the German article on MH370 amd they were under the GNU license. Take a look at it, read the image's license and then you can take action against me if necessary. I'm serious. I read your reply, but I deliberately disobeyed your advice, because of the different licenses types. Does that settle it? (and this time no offense) Look, I just want to reach a fair conclusion. Also the public thanks i sent to you was not sarcastic. I myself was having some difficulty tagging the image for speedy deletion, so thank you for helping me remove it. Tigerdude9 (talk) 03:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

I think you may be stretching patience a little bit here Tiger, Acroterion clearly warned you not to upload images that are not free but you still uploaded File:Air France Flight 447's pilots.jpg which clearly had "All Rights Reserved" on the page. Best that you stop uploading images of any type until you understand the copyright rules here as you may get blocked without any warning. Carry on with your work on accident articles but best if you just keep away from the images, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 18:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

FA

Stop nominating articles for FA when you clearly haven't done the necessary review and editing work that's needed to prepare an article for FA. Acroterion (talk) 22:17, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Seriously, stop fooling around with FA when you clearly don't understand the process. Acroterion (talk) 22:23, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

I already notified you that I submitted it on the peer section previously, but I will be more specific now: I already nominated it in the aviation project's peer review section on October 17, reading the instructions. Proof: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aviation/Peer_review#FAR). Now I just read the official instructions, and to understand, to I read the instructions carefully. This time I did not read it fast. I know that there are 5 steps, but I skipped step 1 on purpose, but that's because I felt it met the requirements, however I, when I saw your message went back and checked. It has 43 citations, which is twice as more than the Danish version (which is a recommended article), but it does have less citations than flight 11. You reverted when I completed step 4 ad was about to do step 5, but stopped when I saw your message FYI, but since you do want me to stop fooling around, fine! Also, since we already have a section called FA we should move it to there to prevent confusion. Tigerdude9 (talk) 22:39, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

It is expected that people who nominate articles for FA status will have ensured that the article meets the featured article criteria, usually through deep personal involvement in the article and discussions with other involved editors. FA status is a big deal, and involves an in-depth review of the article to ensure it's an example of Wikipedia's best work. Please don't nominate any other articles for this status until you understand the process better and, ideally, have made a considerable and high-quality contribution to the articles. As some personal advice, the combination of copyright violations and repeated premature FA nominations suggests that you are struggling in Wikipedia and are at risk of being blocked. Please ease yourself in, and take advantage of the various sources of advice for new editors in the post at the top of this page. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Ok, I already started to eased my self in (kind of). I've already watched the video about editing articles (which I already know how to do), and I already know that sources are needed. I am currently editing United Airlines Flight 175 to make sure it meets FA requirements.

Please be careful, you won't become proficient in creating FA-worthy articles from watching a video, and your history of paying attention to advice isn't encouraging. Acroterion (talk) 00:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

And please be especially careful with existing FAs like United Airlines Flight 93 and American Airlines Flight 77. Acroterion (talk) 01:26, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Ok and ok. I only updated their infoboxes using the current template. I'm being as careful as I can, not trying to sound disruptive. Or make things sound informal. Tigerdude9 (talk) 01:28, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

I know. Not a problem, but please resist the urge to cram too much content into the infobox - it's a a perennial issue. Acroterion (talk) 01:31, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at United Airlines Flight 175, you may be blocked from editing. Do not delete sub-heads without giving a valid reason. David J Johnson (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

I forget to do that sometimes. I can rush sometimes. The best reason I've got is because I'm to determined or anxious. Tigerdude9 (talk) 18:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at United Airlines Flight 175, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop now. You are taking no notice of the advice you have been given and are making changes without thinking and without a valid reason. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 18:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)