User talk:Thundermaker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Thundermaker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --John (talk) 04:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage[edit]

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anwar al-Awlaki edit[edit]

Looking at my edit shows only the addition of a few words, not the massive change that actually occurred. Take a look at both of those. I did not use a script. Something else must be going on. As far as the article in FN5, I tried again and still get the Washington Post screen "We are unable to locate the page you requested. The page may have moved or may no longer be available". Are you getting a cached copy of the original article? I cleared my cache before checking again. --Bejnar (talk) 17:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC) I did not intentionally edit an old version, in fact I don't even think that I looked at an old version, but it does look as if it were the old version that my edit was applied to. --Bejnar (talk) 17:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The added text "article no longer available 23 September 2010" was inside an abcnews.go.com ref. The ref immediately before it was at washingtonpost.com [1], and it also still works for me, I doubt it's cached (although I can't be sure because I'm going through a company proxy right now). It might be a problem with your computer. Thundermaker (talk) 17:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re:FN5 I just ran a couple of searches in the Washington Post archives (for articles over 60 days old) and received the following:
Search Results: Anwar al-Awlaki Between: 07/14/2010 and 07/18/2010 No Articles Found No articles were found for the search you submitted.
Search Results: radical cleric: Between: 07/14/2010 and 07/18/2010

Results 1 to 3 of 3 Page:

  1. Freedom of sketch, Part 2 - Kathleen Parker; The Washington Post; Jul 18, 2010; A.19;
  2. Weather or not, Wichita has its charms - Stephen Amidon; The Washington Post; Jul 18, 2010; F.6;
  3. Gay marriage passes last vote in Argentina; Church had fought bill Activists celebrate a first in Latin America - Juan Forero; The Washington Post; Jul 16, 2010; A.8;

--Bejnar (talk) 17:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I can confirm that the above link doesn't work for me either. I'll try to flag it in the article. Thundermaker (talk) 17:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A bot beat me to it. Well, it's flagged now. Thundermaker (talk) 17:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On your reverts[edit]

Hey, the sections I removed were recently added and do not fit in the articles at all. Allegations that Dudayev participated in carpet bombing are of no relevance to these articles. These allegations were made by Dudayev's military opponent due to the Chechen conflict in the 90s. Dudayev was not an important figure in the Soviet War in Afghanistan, and he is not mentioned at all in books about the Soviet-Afghan War. Therefore his name is completely out of place in these articles. I guess we could create a section on carpet bombing in general during the Soviet-Afghan war. Machinarium (talk) 17:20, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your argument sounds reasonable, but it should be discussed on the articles' talk pages rather than user talk pages. Thundermaker (talk) 18:36, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, but I doubt I'll get responses. The person whose added it seems inactive. Feel free to state your opinion. Machinarium (talk) 00:44, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject National Archives Newsletter[edit]

The first ever WikiProject National Archives newsletter has been published. Please read on to find out what we're up to and how to help out! There are many opportunities for getting more involved. Dominic·t 21:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On your reverts[edit]

You did exactly the same reverts to my addition to the private prison article that ChuckC had done a few days earlier and which I undid, leaving an extensive note for ChuckC.

I gave him the reasons why the sourcing was valid and how to find exactly the sources for each of the descriptive words I'd used in my edit.

None of the content from PrivateCi.org Rap Sheets is generated by that organization. It is a word for word, verbatim transcription of the original news stories that contained each of the difficulties.

If you had looked at the sourcing, I'm assuming, instead of jumping to a conclusion, you would have seen that. If you looked at the talk posted today, you would have likely not made your edits.

It's impossible to read the sourcing and not come to the same conclusion. It's not a long-ago recapitulation of past problems, these are ongoing substantial human rights violations and public safety failures.

Here's yesterday's story, by the way, picked up by the webmaster today:

http://www.theage.com.au/national/asylum-youths-sew-lips-together-20110725-1hxf6.html Above text added by Activist (talk · contribs) except for the final 'l' in the URL.

I didn't read ChuckC's talk page. Perhaps we should be discussing this on talk:Private prison, so all of the article's editors can participate. The Age would be considered a WP:RS, I think. Thundermaker (talk) 14:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I left this feedback on the article's feedback page today.

Activist (talk · contribs) has recently added some material about private prisons in Australia and South Africa, which have been reverted by myself and another editor. The reason is that the source http://www.privateci.org/ does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for a WP:Reliable Source. From a message left on my talk page, it appears to be a collection of articles (excerpts?) from reliable sources, and if we can dig up some of those, it would make a great addition to the article. I have searched for news items about private prisons in Australia and come up empty. Can somebody help to locate the original relevant articles from [1] [2]? 15:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

There's a plethora of information about the for-profit screwups in Australia and New Zealand. I can't imagine how you could not have stumbled over them. If you had gone to the site you're disparaging, you would have found dozens of stories about them, none needing more than a moment's searching to verify from original sources. Here's today's story about the industry's paisd off stooges in government ceding the oversight for civil liberties to the for-profit operators. There have also been at least a dozen stories about SERCO's malfeasance in Australia in the past week.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/5789114/New-laws-toughen-prison-security New laws toughen prison security ANDREA VANCE Last updated 05:00 15/10/2011

Will that do???Activist (talk) 21:49, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Activist (talk) 21:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you (and ChuckC) so precipitously revert updates to a page, without bothering to check the citations to establish whether or not it was verifible, and you don't bother to read my note to him explaining why it was unreasonable, why should I consider your advice?

This isn't a rhetorical question. Activist (talk) 10:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assure you, I did look at your citations before deciding it wasn't a good enough source.
I just now checked user_talk:CliffC, and it contains nothing new about this issue. Private prison is a contentious article, and privateci.org would be seen as a biased source.
Again, the article's talk page at talk:Private prison is the place we should be discussing these things, so that all current editors of that page can participate and future editors can see the rationale behind decisions we make.
The reason I started a discussion on your talk page was because I thought you were a newbie who didn't understand Wikipedia's WP:Reliable source policy, and I wanted to point you in the right direction. The reason you should consider it is that it's Wikipedia policy. I hope that answers your question. Thundermaker (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let me try this again. privateci.org reprints newspaper stories. It doesn't write then, rewrite or otherwise modify them. They're exactly as they originally appeared. There's no legitimate reason, given that circumstance, that it should be seen as a "biased source." The problem is that the industry is thoroughly corrupt, incompent and malfeasant. Simply repeating newspaper stories doesn't make them any more or less so.Activist (talk) 02:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there has been some improvement to the privateci.org site since we talked previously -- the articles are now attributed. However, I compared [10] with [11], and they are different near the end. Assuming good faith, I would guess that privateci saved an earlier version of the article.
Even if the content was exactly the same, I would use the smh.com.au link and not the privateci link because:
  • The Sydney Morning Herald is a respected news source.
  • There may be a copyright violation -- the SMH version is labelled "Copyright © 2011 Fairfax Media".
  • Privateci.org will still be seen as biased. Don't be blind just because you agree with their agenda. If there was a story about great success of some private prison, they would not host it.
I hope you can use the improved privateci site to help find the materials at their original sources and improve Wikipedia that way. However, if your purpose is to promote the site itself, you would be better off using Facebook. Thundermaker (talk) 17:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:V7-sport. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. SudoGhost 18:22, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Civilian casualties in the War in Afghanistan[edit]

Hi Thundermaker,

I had previously removed the year headings under Civilian casualties in the War in Afghanistan (2001–present)#Major casualties and airstrikes by US-led military forces from the table of contents in order to make that section less prominent to those alleging NPOV concerns. I noticed you put them back a month ago, and I think that may have triggered an NPOV tag and NPOV discussion again. I'm going to put back my change, but feel free to discuss if you'd like. Regards, Formats (talk) 06:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My concern is with the extent of coverage, not the number of headings used (which I hadn't even noticed). Nick-D (talk) 06:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Concerning Ali Khamenei Article[edit]

Hello, Thundermaker. You have new messages at talk:Ali Khamenei#Persecution of Bahá'ís.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Peter Deer (talk) 11:50, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator sought for the US National Archives WikiProject[edit]

Greetings, WikiProject US National Archives member!

We are seeking a coordinator to help reboot the project and work on new initiatives! The role is modeled after other Wikiproject coordinators, like the WikiProject Military History coordinators. The coordinator will work with the Wikipedian in Residence to organize and increase participation in the WikiProject, with the goal that the WikiProject is an active space for collaboration maintained by and for the Wikipedia editors, rather than the National Archives.

Please see the full information at Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Coordinator and contact me is you have any questions. Feel free to pass this note along to any interested parties. Thanks! Dominic·t 21:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zachary Adam Chesser for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zachary Adam Chesser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Adam Chesser until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest355 Talk 23:03, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Management and Training Corporation[edit]

Your concerns about Management and Training Corporation vandalizing the article regarding its operations were well taken. Activist (talk) 21:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Assassins may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • for slaying Ka'b Ibn al-Ashraf, the Jew. It took place on 14 Rabi' al-Awwal (4. September AC 624))}}</ref> According to [[Ibn Ishaq]], Muhammad ordered his followers to kill Ka'b because he "had

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:16, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch.  Fixed Thundermaker (talk) 06:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chrysler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • affected SUV worldwide, all that is required is the drive to a local dealer for the repair.<ref>[http://media.chrysler.com/newsrelease.do?&id=15493&mid=</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Brown revert[edit]

Hi,

I understand that you were trying to be helpful, but the change I made corrected the bill number of the Consenting Adults Sex Act of 1975. It's AB 489, not AB 849. Reverting it to a transcription error isn't helpful, and since it was a very minor error/edit I didn't bother leaving a message when I made my initial edit. Feel free to look it up in leginfo, then please either make that change yourself or restore my edit.

107.184.248.228 (talk) 00:20, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see now you're right. In case you're unaware, there is currently a form of vandalism on Wikipedia where anonymous users make random numeric changes. My initial searches for "AB 489" and "AB 849" pointed to the latter being a more notable bill and therefore more likely to be correct. On closer examination I was clearly wrong. I'll change it to link to Consenting Adult Sex Bill. Thank you for the explanation. Thundermaker (talk) 06:20, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baltimore Gazette, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William H. Carpenter. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that was a good catch. None of the people listed on the DAB were him, so I removed the wikilink. Thundermaker (talk) 12:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Thundermaker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Thundermaker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Thundermaker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thundermaker&oldid=1056653947"