User talk:Thoriq Rahmat

Thoriq Ahmad Rahmat, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Thoriq Ahmad Rahmat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

I received your email message requesting to be unblocked. However, since you have a long history of sockpuppetry, I will not be unblocking this account, and if you wish to be unblocked, you must the request from your original account. —DoRD (talk) 12:50, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, you should not continue to request new accounts through WP:ACC. —DoRD (talk) 12:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thoriq Rahmat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. Please. Give me chance. I will not do disruptive editing again. Thank you

Decline reason:

You're blocked as a checkuser block, which normally means you have used multiple accounts. In your next unblock request, I suggest you explain what disruptive editing you think you've done, and which accounts you have used. PhilKnight (talk) 16:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thoriq Rahmat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi PhilKnight, Good evening. You suggested me to explain what had i done in the past. Well, before i was addicted to edit the airport pages. First, i went to www.garuda-indonesia.com (the website of the airline of indonesia) and went to its route map. I saw that garuda indonesia flies to milan, london heathrow, etc. (by codeshare agreement). Before i didn't really know what does "codeshare agreement" mean. So when i went to wikipedia and search for "Soekarno Hatta International Airport" and found that garuda just fly to amsterdam (now amsterdam and london) in its europe route. I was wondering that why it was only amsterdam route written in the soekarno airport page. Then i created an account "Thoriq Azka Rahmat and then i tried to edit the page (soekarno hatta airport page) by adding some destinations in garuda indonesia destinations. I was patrolled by HkCaGu and then he warned me that "if you continue vandalize wikipedia, you will be blocked". Then when i still continuing editing the soekarno airport page with wrong information, i was blocked. Then i started making a new account as a sockpuppet account. Because i think the information was correct, but actually it is wrong. And now i realize that "codeshare agreement" means the airline is operated by other airline, not by this airline (Garuda Indonesia), and now my account has been blocked indefitinely. My sockpuppet account was: Thoriq rahmat, Thoriq Rahmat E.R, Blackace1221, and this account. And i upload some images by copying the images from someome but don't have permission from them (but some of them i have the permission). I am sorry for everything did. I also tried so many times to log in with my original account but i forgot the password because it was created in 2013. So maybe you can read this all history and lift this block. Thank you

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, a standard offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 17:48, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thoriq Rahmat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Oh please, no need any standard offer required for me. I made my disruptive editing almost 2 years ago, after that i don't do any disruptive editing until now. I have understood that it was my mistake. Please lift this block. It's too long to wait 6 months. No standard offer is needed because i have realized my mistake, and almost 2 years ago i stopped my disruptive editing. It's already more than 6 months, more than 1 year ago. Please lift this block. Please. I won't do this kind of editing (disruptive editing) again. Don't lift this block 6 months again. Too long for me. I've understood my mistake and i will not do this again. Please lift this block. Please. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Given that one of your sockpuppet accounts prior to this one was created last month, it most certainly has not been 2 years since your disruptive editing. In other words, it's probably going to be the standard offer or nothing. Kinu ^t/_c 17:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thoriq Rahmat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ough..... OUGHH!!! OK! NO PROBLEM! I will wait for 6 months without disruptive editing and creating new account. Now we will see. Starting from 23 May 2015, I should be unblocked 6 months later. I want to warn you, DON'T BE A LIAR. I want to be unblocked 6 months later (6 months later after 23 May 2015). Thank You. 17:58, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you don't create any additional accounts and stay away from Wikipedia for 6 months, we will go through with the standard offer and unblock your account. Just to let you know, today is April 23rd not May 23rd. Mike V • Talk 18:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2015[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thoriq Rahmat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

? Yes, you are correct! Oh, sorry, i forgot that today is 23 april, not 23 may. But 6 months after 23 April 2015, i should be unblocked. In this 6 months i will not make any accounts, and also i will not make disruptive editing again, but i should be unblocked 6 months after today (23 April 2015). Thank you. 18:40, 23 April 2015

Decline reason:

Your wish for a standard offer has been noted, and may be examined 6 months from now. At that time, you may request it through an unblock request here, but there will be no automatic unblock. In the meantime, please stop creating additional unblock requests, or your talk page access may be revoked (you can make comments here without a full unblock request). Please remember that any activity with other accounts or IP addresses will jeopardize the likelihood that you will be unblocked. If nothing else, it will simply reset the 6-month clock. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:24, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2015[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thoriq Rahmat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, it's already 6 months since my last unblock request and i also was examined by an administrator for standard offer. Now the time has passed and today I want to be unblocked, and also unblock my other sockpuppet accounts Thoriq rahmat, Thoriq Rahmat E.R and Thoriq Azka Rahmat. Also please unblock "account creation" and unblock my IP address if my IP address is blocked. Thank you 06:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think the above request shows you understand the problems with your past conduct. Huon (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thoriq Rahmat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've understood all of my mistake. I was editing with an invalid information regarding aviation. Now I understand my mistake and will not repeat it again by editing with valid information. I want to start editing Wikipedia again. Please unblock me and I don't want to argue with you and keep making unnecessary unblock requests. Thoriq Ahmad Rahmat (talk) 07:17 (GMT:3) 28 October 2015

Decline reason:

The standard offer is not a guarantee. Please tell us why you felt the need to operate six sockpuppet accounts, only three of which you have admitted in the request above?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 23:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2015[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thoriq Rahmat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's OK if standard offer is not guarantee to an unblock. So what's the guarantee to an unblock? The important thing is: I'm not going to repeat my mistake. Don't think I'm a liar. I thought that my edits are correct information, so when my edits are removed by someone because it's a wrong information (i thought it's a correct information) and blocked by someone because of my edit warring, i keep making new accounts to avoid being watched by administrators and keep editing with wrong information because I thought that it was a correct information. Now I understand. Please unblock me. What should I do? Is there anything I should explain more? Please give me ways to an unblock. Thoriq Ahmad Rahmat talk 06:13, 30 October 2015 (GMT:3)

Decline reason:

Your request to unblock your sockpuppets is screaming that you don't understand our policies. I suggest trying again in another six months, because evidently the initial wait didn't help. Max Semenik (talk) 20:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thoriq Ahmad Rahmat, it's just a hunch on my part but it was a mistake to ask that your sockpuppet accounts be unblocked. This implies that you plan on using them which would be considered continuing socking behavior. If you were to only operate one account, there is no reason for your sockpuppet accounts to be unblock, in fact, they should never be unblocked. At this point, the focus is not on past edits that might have been disruptive but whether or not you are abiding by your promise not to sock. If you have continued to edit while blocked, it will reset the standard offer which, as Anthony Bradbury states, is not a guarantee or a promise. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thoriq Rahmat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, fine if my other sock accounts can't be unblocked. Just unblock this account and unblock my IP address and account creation. I want to start editing again and will be more careful in my edits, but I don't want to wait for another 6 months. I'm tired at keep making bunch of unnecessary unblock requests. I promise will not evade blocks by making new sock account. I will not continue my socking behavior. Please give me a chance. Thoriq Ahmad Rahmat (talk) 14:44, 5 November 2015 (GMT:3)

Decline reason:

Please see below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 21:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In reply to your email: I will not review any further unblock requests of yours, but providing some more information on why you want to be unblocked may help. If unblocked, what kind of edits would you be interested in? Huon (talk) 18:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want account creation enabled?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to Huon: I'm interested to edit anything which I know, and with correct and acceptable information.

In reply to 823510731 and Anthony Bradbury: Yes it's true that I want to create new account but not for illegitimate reasons. I want to create new account because:

1. I will feel ashame if my page is looked by other users, because there are lots of declined unblock requests.

2. I will be no longer using this account. This account may be used for edit testing. This account will be an alternative account of the new one, and the new account will not be used for sock puppetry. I promise.

Please give me another chance. I promise that my new account will not be used for sock puppetry. I will not create the new account till this account's block is lifted.

Now everything is clearly explained. Anything else? Thoriq Ahmad Rahmat (talk) 17:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined your appeal and revoked your talk page access. You have shown with your latest comments that you do not have a sufficient knowledge of the policy and you have failed to make a convincing argument to allow you to commence editing again. Your recourse for future appeals is via email and the Unblock Ticket Request System.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 21:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has e-mailed me, asking (again) for the standard offer. I have reminded him of the relevant terms, and repeated that even complete compliance does not guarantee an unblock, although there may then be a possibility of block release. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Thoriq Rahmat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After another 6 months of standard offer, I would like to tell something about: 1- My actions and the reason I was blocked: The reason was because of sockpuppetry. The main account was used for editing with false information (I did that because I think that I was editing with correct information) and that account was blocked because of edit war. Before I didn't really know about Wikipedia rule that if we make another account for evading blocks, it can lead to an indefinite block and this is called sockpuppetry. 2- Lessons from the block: After 1 year absence from editing Wikipedia (I've made 2X standard offer examination) I understand that Wikipedia is a patrolled website that you should follow the rules given by them. I understand that i can't evade blocks by making new accounts or we will get in more big trouble. I understand that i should have sufficient knowledge to edit wikipedia to avoid getting trouble of edit warring. Sockpuppetry. Edit warring. I hope that I will not do this things again in the future. Give me a chance to contribute in this Wikipedia again. With this account. Thanks. Thoriq Ahmad Rahmat (talk) 5:57 pm, 15 June 2016, last Wednesday (6 days ago) (UTC+2)

Accept reason:

I'm unblocking you, but be sure not to repeat same mistakes. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to have discussions with administrators so that this problem can be solved. Any administrator notice this, please do not hesitate to discuss my unblock request with me on my talk page. Leave a message here, and I will give the reply. Thanks. Thoriq Ahmad Rahmat (talk) 12:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be unblocked if you:

Agree to use only one account (this one) from now on, and never to use any other account.
Tell us the list of all accounts you were (ab)using.
Tell us why you think it is not allowed to use multiple accounts.
Explain what kind of edits you intend to make if unblocked (please, be precise with this, tell us the exact edits you want to make).

I do not guarantee you'll be unblocked. Unblock depends on the answers to the above question that you provide, so take your time to answer. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Answers to your questions:

Yes, I will keep using this account and not using another sock accounts. (Can you please delete my another account if possible to avoid getting this account reblocked again with another admin because of suspect of sockpuppetry?)
Thoriq rahmat, Thoriq Azka Rahmat (main account), Thoriq Rahmat E.R, Blackace1221, Muhammad Ibrahim Ahmad, Thoriq Dhiyaan Azka Rahmat.
It is not allowed to use multiple account to evade blocks because this means escaping blocks by another illegitimate way. The block is on us as a person, not as a account user.
I'm interested in editing Aviation, Islamic Religion and Countries.

I hope this all can fulfill the terms to be unblocked. Thoriq Ahmad Rahmat (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not possible to delete account according to our WP:terms of use. And, yes, you are free to remove unblock requests from this page once you are unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]