User talk:Thinhin of you

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Thinhin of you! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ~QwerpQwertus [[User talk:QwerpQwertus
 ]] [[Special:Contributions/QwerpQwertus ]] 05:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Please edit[edit]

Please find the suitable tone for Triology 1: Faye's Journey and Triology 2: Lyra's Destiny in Dream Chronicle Template page. Thanks.

Any changes are welcomed. As long as it is better.

Note: The distributor is Various. Because the games was sold in many other websites. Not just by PlayFirst. Definitely, PlayFirst was the publisher.Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 12:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking to me?[edit]

Are you talking to an animal? Thinhin of you 16:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Artist/Writer/Composer in DC's series/games should be removed[edit]

Please read the guideline as Artist(s), Write(s), Composer(s) is/are a notable person/people.

"SomaTone Interactive Audio" in Composer seemed like an audio system, not a composer. Please consider. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 12:06, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dream Chronicles 1 Streets Of Wish.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dream Chronicles 1 Streets Of Wish.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetical Order[edit]

Thanks for switching back to alphabetical order in the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards article; however, it's still not quite properly done: Common convention for spelling in the majority of Wikipedia articles I have seen, especially for award shows, is to alphabetize by surname (last name), and, where there is no surname, by first or full name. Thus, Katy Perry is alphabetized as a P, while Kesha is a K. Lady Gaga is an L, meanwhile, because the stage name has no pretense of being an first name followed by a surname (whereas stage names like Ricky Martin would be alphabetized as an M). Again, this is just common alphabetization practice in lists and award show articles. Take for instance this category taken straight from the 52nd Grammy Awards page:

Best New Artist

  • Zac Brown Band
  • Keri Hilson
  • MGMT
  • Silversun Pickups
  • The Ting Tings

There, Zac Brown Band goes first because it's counted as a B, followed by Keri Hilson who is there as an H and then MGMT who are an M (even though it may look like she's there because K goes before M). You can find the same kind of ordering in pages for individual ceremonies of the Emmy Awards, Oscars, etc. That's just the common way of alphabetizing in English-speaking countries, both in written lists and in real life: If you go to a CD store, you're more likely to find Katy Perry's CD in the P section than in the K one, and even class rosters in schools and universities are organized by surname or last name, not by first name.

A good few of us who work on the VMA articles are working very hard to make them coherent, reliable, organized, and, most importantly, consistent with each other. We're trying to have them be on par with other award show articles, and that is why we try to follow that same conventions. Categories are organized in a manner so taht they are grouped as: General -> Artist -> Genre -> Professional. That kind of organization is more common sense than anything else, but it's still arbitrary. If someone wishes to change to an alphabetical organization of categories, I wouldn't stand on their way--though I do think that it would make the articles more complicated to read through.

Also, the reason why I did a lot of reverts just these past few days (as it seems like you might've looked at my history of contributions) was because some anonymous editor went through most if not all VMA articles and changed the winner of several categories to the wrong one (in most cases he changed the winner to Madonna, No Doubt, or Gwen Stefani for categories where they were nominated but lost). Now if the choices are to go through almost twenty articles and delete six apostrophes per messed-up category and then type in six new apostrophes around the rightful winner, or to simply click on an 'undo' button, I think most people (myself included) would definitely go for the easier, less time-consuming option. But then again, that's just me.

Hope you understand now why it is that I edit the VMA articles the way I do and why I saw it fit to revert your latest edits to the 2010 one. Thus, I also hope that you understand why it is that I'm going to have to edit the 2010 VMA article again after you edited it so that all categories are alphabetized properly. Thanks for taking the time to read this little note of explanation. --Andresg770 (talk) 19:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space[edit]

Hey there Thinhin of you, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Thinhin of you. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: I want to ask you a favor, a Wiki friend![edit]

Well id love to rate your articles for you, but the problem is i dont have any experience in article quality ratings outside of Stub class and Start class. To me the articles look great but as to what quality i have no idea. The advide i can give would be to submit your request over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games where there are many Users who are experienced in writing and reviewing articles. Sorry i couldnt help, hope this helps. Salavat (talk) 13:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Chronicles assessments[edit]

I've left assessments for all the articles on Talk:Dream Chronicles (series). --Teancum (talk) 15:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Chronicles reception[edit]

Why you removed all the negative reception from Dream Chronicles articles? --Mika1h (talk) 21:48, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Dream Chronicles/GA1[edit]

I have conducted a Good Article review of this article, and unfortunately Failed it. The article falls far short of the standard required of a Good Article. Currently it is only C class. It is generally expected that editors will ensure an article is B class, perform a proofread, and assess it against the Good Article criteria themselves before taking it to GAN. This does not appear to have happened here. Nevertheless, there is much hard work that has been done on the article and you should not be discouraged! It is lengthy, has many good sources, and is illustrated by attractive screenshots (although there are problems with these - see the review). Continue improving the article, and I look forward to you re-nominating after a substantial improvement. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Your GA nomination of Dream Chronicles: The Book of Air[edit]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Dream Chronicles: The Book of Air you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Deryck C. 22:48, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The article Dream Chronicles: The Book of Air you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dream Chronicles: The Book of Air for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Deryck C. 23:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that made you happy. The article is almost certainly a convincing B-class; it's very unusual for anyone to put up a GA nomination that doesn't satisfy B-class already. In the future, it may help to know that anyone is allowed to rate any article to a class below GA (ie. B, C, start, stub), including the editor who wrote most of the article. Keep working! --Deryck C. 11:00, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dream Chronicles First Trilogy.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dream Chronicles First Trilogy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Edge of Glory. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. You are misusing the HitFix source — Legolas (talk2me) 16:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From MTartaj[edit]

Hi Buzzworthy. Sorry to answer you after months posting the talk message in Wikipedia. I really appreciate much your love to Dream Chronicles, thank you! Unfortunately, I cannot tell you if The Book of Fire will be realease one day... it's not in my hands but I would love to make it.

Cheers! Miguel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtartaj (talk • contribs) 16:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 19 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Thinhin of you. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Thinhin of you. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dream Chronicles 1 Cutscene.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dream Chronicles 1 Cutscene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Thinhin of you. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Moon (EP) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, New Moon (EP), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 18:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Moon (EP) (November 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs better sourcing. Allkpop, Kpopmap and Soompi are not reliable per WP:KOREA/RS Also needs charting and reviews.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Thinhin of you! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Moon (EP) (November 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please remove unreliable sources such as Hellokpop, Soompi, Allkpop, Kpopstarz, Kpopping. Add reviews and charting.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Moon (EP) (February 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at New Moon (EP) instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thinhin_of_you&oldid=1142734244"