User talk:Thequietfactchecker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please don't remove red links until you become familiar with the guideline[edit]

We have a guideline about red links here: Wikipedia:Red link. According to it, many if not most red links that you will encounter should not in fact be removed. You may remove red links which really need removing, but it will take you a while to begin properly figuring out which those are. Red links have an important function. This being said, wecome! :) —Alalch E. 21:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It took me a hot minute to find out how to reply on mobile. Read you loud and clear (I was trying to show-off, but reality is I do see the value of those links in that there should always be a trail).

I am always happy to get constructive criticism, and will never get annoyed - but be warned, I’m hyper competitive so when I learn something I’ll stick to it! Ha.

Thanks for the time in checking it out. Thequietfactchecker (talk) 21:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm WindTempos. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. WindTempos (talkcontribs) 21:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was following Wikipedia's direction of changing the minor errors in the pages I was sent to, and I stuck to precisely what it directed. Small minor change in the improper use of grammar.
I'm not requiring 'experimentation', just following direction of Wikipedia.
What would you suggest I do moving forward making minor edits as directed? Thequietfactchecker (talk) 21:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the article itself, per Wikipedia, is written in a promotional way when, infact it should be less subjective, and more factual (per the note at the top).
How would you bring it up to "bot-standards" or does that not matter, per-se in everyday editing?
(Just getting a feel for the lay of the land, I know bots are often not 100% correct as they're missing details etc..)
Thequietfactchecker (talk) 21:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]