User talk:The owner of all/Archives/2021/May
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- United Nations
- added a link pointing to Congo
- World Health Organization
- added a link pointing to Congo
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Killing of Ma'Khia Bryant, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I've removed the tag "failed verification". The page listed is both active and a verifiable, reliable source for the governor's remarks (which are quoted verbatim). Please refrain from placing unnecessary, extraneous tags on articles. Buffs (talk) 16:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Snopes
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
- Your addition is disputed; the WP:BURDEN is on you to get talk page consensus to restore it. Adding pointy clean-up tags is disruptive, don't do it again.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't add the content, it was in the consensus version. The other editor deleted some of the content. The owner of all ✌️ 22:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- "Adding" includes restoring disputed content. You are well past WP:3RR on the article, even after my warning above.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't add the content, it was in the consensus version. The other editor deleted some of the content. The owner of all ✌️ 22:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- No I am not. I have made a total of 3 reverts in that time. Plus, the policy doesn't say that one editor can dispute content just to get it removed. The owner of all ✌️ 22:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 18:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)