User talk:The-15th

Many critics are so stereotyped. Echoes it's really a dance-punk record, but Pieces Of People We Love the bands get into funk and disco music.

Unfornately, my references are so little compared with other "critics", it's better don't change nothing.

Thanks for the message!

Their (She Wants Revenge's) first reviews I saw on the internet, when nobody heard of them, regarded them as a goth rock band. So I looked into it. Ever since then, I can't find a reason why they aren't goth rock. But Dark wave is what you're asking...

It's just the experience with the many shades of darkwave I'm convinced, though I wouldn't have called them that when they first started out. I've heard all the songs they've released and some they haven't, even heard how they perform live. They're just something that appeals to the fans of the first wave of goth rock bands, like those of the deathrock, darkwave and often ebm genres as well. Please get back to me.

(Skinnydrifter (talk) 19:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

You're right Pink Industry sounds nothing like She Wants Revenge. But Nine Inch Nails doesn't sound like Psychic TV. Darkwave is a vast genre that I've been exploring for well over many years before I discovered She Wants Revenge. You can't listen to one band and say that's darkwave, cause there are so many layers. During my time I have found atleast 9 types of darkwave.

I've never heard darkwave referred to as goth rock and new wave before. That's like saying cold wave is cold rock and new wave. So you might ask, How can Project Pitchfork, Girls Under Glass, VNV Nation and Rotersand be called darkwave at times? The most frequent usage in regards to the term is electronic goth music, which I usually agree with. A lot of She Wants Revenge is more electronic than a post-punk. Early Depeche Mode, Clan of Xymox, some London After Midnight, Wolfsheim or The Danse Society may lead you in the right direction. Then you could try the core sound of darkwave (the type that I think She Wants Revenge fit in with) with bands like Pink Turns Blue and Feeding Fingers.

There's always a particular mellow strings/synth sound section typical throughout this subgenre of music that sets it away from indie rock and post-punk genres. Covering Depeche Mode's "Stripped" must have been a bad move if they never wanted to be called darkwave, as that song is from their most considered "darkwave" album. Before, the song was covered by Rammstein which launched their popularity, whilst still an unknown band. This was also the reason why they were often called gothic metal rather than NDH or even industrial metal in their early years. Maybe this could change with She Wants Revenge when they grow and progress their style, but there's no denying their goth to darkwave influenced sound.

I find it's good they're doing their own thing, that's why I don't disagree that they are partly a post-punk revival, but that's only one piece of a bigger picture. Goths usually have a wide variety of musical inspirations and influences, that's where the confusion starts.

(Skinnydrifter (talk) 12:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC))

Franz Ferdinand (band)

Hi The-15th. I noticed you added a protection tag to the article Franz Ferdinand (band). Adding the protection tag does not protect the page - only an administrator can protect pages. If you want to request that this article is protected you should do so at the noticeboard for page protection requests. I have removed the tag since it is currently misleading. Thanks, Gwernol 15:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Nice to have a debate...

Malcolm Ross's comments are particularly pertinent. His band were inspired by the Mods that went before them, but were not Mods themselves. In a similar way, FF may have been inspired to some degree by bands such as Josef K, Orange Juice or Monochrome Set, but they are not Post Punk themselves. Post Punk is a term that in many ways is simply chronological. Orange Juice, The Specials and The Pop Group are all referred to as Post Punk, yet all they really have in common is the era in which they existed (ie post '76 and God Save The Queen).

As I mentioned earlier, my main concern is with the word 'revival'. To me 'revival' can be applied to a Rockabilly revival act such as the Stray Cats or a Mod Revival act such as The Lambrettas. Both attempted to recreate the sounds and image of a previous era verbatim. This is not the case with any of this current set of bands. It may possibly be argued in the case of a band like Interpol who have a very similar sound and aesthetic to Joy Division or The Chameleons, but not in the case of FF, The Arctic Monkeys - even the Strokes or Killers. As for a band like the Cribs - I can't see any Post Punk influence there at all. If anything, they seem to be coming from a background of British DIY and US indie influences. With FF, there are many distinct influences, of which post punk is only a small part: eg Led Zeppelin, The Beatles, The Kinks, Can, Neu, Kraftwerk, Roxy Music, Sparks, Pulp, Captain Beefheart, even Neutral Milk Hotel (listen to Two Headed Boy and the intro of Take Me Out). They definitely did not set out to 'revive' any movement and although they have mentioned being fans of Orange Juice or The Fire Engines, they have never mentioned the words "Post Punk" in any of hundreds of interviews. This term does seem to be something which has appeared within the last year and seems to reflect a trend amongst certain (mainly US, mainly amateur) critics, rather than any bands themselves.

As for Indie Rock, well that seems a more bona-fide genre than PPR. You're right, FF are of that genre because they are signed to Domino - an indie. Technically, this should not reflect the sound of a band, but a recognised genre has evolved since the '80s with bands like the Smiths, Wedding Present, Soup Dragons and Primal Scream, then over the years, encompassing everything from Oasis and The Libertines to Modest Mouse and Death Cab For Cutie. Indie is also more of a UK term. In the US, bands of this type are usually referred to as alternative. Both are generic terms that refer to bands that are generally outside the perceived mainstream, although even this rule seems perverse when bands such as REM, Nirvana or The Cure become mainstream with their sales, yet retain the indie/alternative tag.

Anyway, back to post punk. I concede that FF may have been influenced by a few post punk bands (amongst many other influences), but do you honestly believe that FF formed with the intention of reviving a fleeting music scene from 25 years earlier? They made many (often spurious) claims such as wanting to make girls dance or whatever, but the intention of reviving post punk was not one of them. Wardroad (talk) 02:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The-15th

I would like to say that the user The-15th, keeps vanderlsing the page. If you go on to history and see his edits, undo them as they contain vanderlism —Preceding unsigned comment added by EdzMaldoom (talk • contribs) 15:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello. It would be more appropriate if your comments were occassionally a little more civil. It is not particularly good form to remove any edit you disagree with using the catch-all phrase "non-useful". Non-useful to whom? Why are they "non-useful". What do you define as "useful". To effectively debate you need to be more specific. If you expect to be treated with respect yourself, you need to treat others with that respect too. If you disagree with someone's perspective you can't ask for them to be banned from editing. If that was the case you may not last that long yourself. With best of regards and in the interests of healthy, informed debate, Wardroad (talk) 19:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:From The Cradle To The Grave.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:From The Cradle To The Grave.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Indie-electro

Just letting you know that you didn't properly create the (2nd nomination) page for Indie-electro; you have to create a new AfD page with (2nd nomination) at the end of the title if an older AfD already exists. I fixed it for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

• No big deal. The AfD directions aren't all that clear, especially for creating second, third, etc. nominations. Installing Twinkle makes it a lot easier. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Article deletion

I was surprised to see that there were no articles regarding the rocktronica music genre on Wikipedia. I traced a deletion request through logs and it came back to you. Your talk page would suggest that you have an interest in music, so I find it a little hard to understand how you would believe that the genre doesn't exist. Several bands have themselves described their music as rocktronica, such as The Crystal Method, and a Google search would indeed yield more than a couple of results, I'm sure. If this article was to be recreated, would you object? The Cake is a Lie ^{T / C} 00:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Thefunkybranca.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thefunkybranca.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:54, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Message from WikiProject Punk music

Hello!

You may be interested to know that WikiProject Punk music has recently undergone a major revitalization. Please visit the project page to see our new look and check out some of our helpful new features, such as the Assessment Department and the Collaboration of the week. There are also a number of tasks on our Things to do page that you may be interested in helping with.

We are currently holding a roll call to help gauge how many active project members we have. Please visit the project's talk page and add your signature to the roll sheet to express your continued interest in the project. Also, if you have not already done so, please take a minute to add your name to the Participants page along with a brief summary of your punk-related interests, so that other project members will be better able to collaborate with you. If you do not add your signature to the roll sheet by November 30, 2008 your name will be moved to our list of inactive members. We may also take the liberty of removing the project userbox from your userpage if it appears there, to prevent you from automatically appearing in Category:WikiProject Punk music members. Of course you are free to rejoin the project and re-add the userbox at any time if you would like to become active in the project again.

Thank you and we hope you will continue to support WikiProject Punk music!

--IllaZilla (talk) 01:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Birthday Party.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Birthday Party.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Orangejuiceband.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Orangejuiceband.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Better scream.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Better scream.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:35, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Live on a Hot August Night

The article Live on a Hot August Night has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 09:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Live On A Hot August Night.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Live On A Hot August Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)