User talk:Thad Riley

Previous edits[edit]

Your user page says "previously I edited without registering". Could you point me to some of your edits? Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 08:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a very welcoming message. Perhaps if you leave me a plate of warm chocolate cookies like other new users get, I can answer your quarstion. Thanks. Thad Riley (talk) 19:04, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, please answer my question. You showed up here right after the last scibaby sock was blocked, and your began reverting to the scibaby version. Viriditas (talk) 03:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you are talking about. You are not displaying Wikilove and you are vandalizing pages...so you need to get with the Wikipedia program and stop trolling. Thad Riley (talk) 04:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This, this, this, this, and this. Of course, that's a very, very, very, very, very, very, VERY small sample of the evidence against you. Viriditas (talk) 04:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 06:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Please read WP:VANDAL before marking another revert as "rv vandalism", as you did in these edits:[1][2][3] Good faith edits, even in an edit dispute, are never vandalism. Will Beback talk 06:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]