User talk:Textbook

EIIR - Lady of the Garter?

I'm not sure that LG is the correct post-nominal for EIIR; she is the Sovereign of the Order, not a Lady of it. PrinceOfCanada (talk) 16:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

No, it is most certainly not correct — the Queen holds no British honours whatsoever because she is the fons honorum (Fountain of Honour). She can't hold honours of which she is the fount...

And by the way, the British Royalty style guide precludes listing postnominals in the lead. Please revert your work — if you disagree and believe the postnominals should be there, you should raise the issue here. I look forward to working with you. Yours DBD 16:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

HM Queen Elizabeth II

The Queen was appointed a Lady of the Garter before becoming monarch.Textbook (talk) 16:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk page blanking

Dear Sir, I wish to advise you that the deletion of the content on your talk page is regarded as extremely poor form and indeed rather impolite. If your talk page gets too long, you may archive (see my talk page for an example). I shall assume good faith this once, but advise you that in future, I will regard such a move as tantamount to ignoring other wikipedians' views. If you would like any help at all, at any point, I offer my humble services — my talk page is always open! Yours faithfully DBD 17:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Style

Long standing wiki precedent is not to include styles in the opening of an article, so articles on bishops should not begin The Right Reverend, the only form of address that is used is "Sir" or "Dame" where applicable. See WP:Manual of Style (biographies)#Honorific prefixes. Please stop adding the style back in to Rupert Hoare. David Underdown (talk) 10:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Elizabeth Conyers

A tag has been placed on Elizabeth Conyers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 00:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Alice Eccles

Hi there. I noticed you blanked this page just after you created it. I'm not sure whether it was deliberate, so I've restored it. If you think a page should be deleted (say, you created it by mistake) and you're its only significant author, you can tag it for speedy deletion by putting {{db-author}} at the top of the page. Best, Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 19:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I tagged Alice Eccles for deletion as it is a repost of deleted material. A deletion debate decided that this individual did not meet the notability guidelines. The discussion is here. Textbook, if you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Cunard (talk) 21:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of William David Eccles

A tag has been placed on William David Eccles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds 01:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Honorary Doctors of the University of Chicago

Category:Honorary Doctors of the University of Chicago, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 09:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Chair of the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC)

Category:Chair of the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC), which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 21:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:People associated with York and Yorkshire

I have nominated Category:People associated with York and Yorkshire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Deiz talk 14:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Burgon Society

An article that you have been involved in editing, Burgon Society, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burgon Society. Thank you. Eastmain (talk) 05:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Textbook! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Stuart Beake - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Clare McLaren-Throckmorton

I have nominated Clare McLaren-Throckmorton, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clare McLaren-Throckmorton. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stuart Beake

The article Stuart Beake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Stuart Beake – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 07:53, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Diana Babar

The article Diana Babar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BLP1E as only notable as 1 of nearly 100 people to gain a CBE in the 2008 New Year Honours list. The entire content of this article is already covered at 2008 New Year Honours

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Road Wizard (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Diana Babar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diana Babar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Babar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Road Wizard (talk) 18:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Edmund Pery, 7th Earl of Limerick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edmund Pery, 7th Earl of Limerick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund Pery, 7th Earl of Limerick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flaming Ferrari (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Ralph Publicover for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Publicover is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Publicover until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flaming Ferrari (talk) 13:11, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Romantic period research academics has been nominated for discussion

Category:Romantic period research academics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Diana Babar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diana Babar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Babar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orville1974 (talk) 12:50, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sandra Mary Caldwell

The article Sandra Mary Caldwell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The single (12-year-old) reference given in this article fails to establish the subject's notability, or if in fact the person in question still holds the title this article ascribes to them. Further, most mentions of the subject online are either sourced to this Wikipedia article and contain little to no further information, or otherwise refer to Caldwell only by her title with no additional information at all. This source too would seem to indicate Caldwell has left government ("retired public servant") and gone to work in the private sector.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Evan ^{(talk|contribs)} 07:51, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Fraser Wilson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fraser Wilson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraser Wilson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 10:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrew Henderson (diplomat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Henderson (diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Henderson (diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 20:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Charles Lonsdale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Lonsdale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Lonsdale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 09:10, 9 February 2023 (UTC)