User talk:Teranair
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Teranair, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! : Noyster (talk), 10:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, Noyster. I am trying to create my first article, and that link helped a lot. Teranair (talk) 13:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The article Urbanpod has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not establish notability. Promotional.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for this. Looking to see if I can rectify this. Teranair (talk) 15:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Lauv has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not establish musical notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Clear Coffee[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Clear Coffee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gaioa (talk) 16:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Clear Coffee for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clear Coffee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear Coffee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Juliancolton Thanks for notifying me. I think I agree with you. Let's see. Teranair (talk) 16:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
AnyVan[edit]
Hello Teranair. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. This is to remind you of our Paid-contribution disclosure policy. If you are being paid for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship. Mduvekot (talk) 16:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Mduvekot! Do my edits give that sort of an impression? I'm sorry, but I think I was framing the sentences neutrally. I know about the paid contribution policy (I have read about it, and also the recent Burger King issue), and I am not related to AnyVan or any of its employees in any way. I just chose this article because I was reading up on the emissions issue in the UK. I also intend to edit Shiply and uShip articles, which suspiciously seems to be written by the same user. I'd request you to point out areas which I have edited where you think I might have added inappropriate content. I'll be glad to address them. Thanks for your help! Teranair (talk) 17:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- I hope that you can see that your interest in a UK transportation company might come across as untypical for a professor of Literature. Especially when that the article on that company has been nominated for speedy deletion, been proposed for deletion, and earlier contributors have received warnings about a potential conflict of interest. Companies sometimes try whitewash their articles by hiring editors to remove what they perceive as criticism from an article to give it a more positive spin. We consider that a violation of our neutral point of view. Some of us monitor the job boards where such "gigs" are offered and try to identify the editors who engage in undisclosed paid editing. If this doesn't apply to you and if you have no conflict of interest, then all is well. Mduvekot (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- Mduvekot - Oh dear, this all looks so wrong to me. I had no idea about that page's history before you pointed out. I did see some comments on the Talk page but thought they were from exasperated customers. Anyways, the company seems notable because it was created through the system, now that I see - Articles for Creation. The article was already clean, and I couldn't see any negative points mentioned. Maybe, it was removed by these so-called whitewashers. I had some more resources in hand, but I'm not sure if I want to continue editing that page. Might as well move on. What do you think? Teranair (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- Teranair I think you might look for an area where you have expertise and can contribute constructively. And yes, before tacking a page, read the associated talk page and the history. I like Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, why don't you join us? Mduvekot (talk) 23:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- Mduvekot - Oh dear, this all looks so wrong to me. I had no idea about that page's history before you pointed out. I did see some comments on the Talk page but thought they were from exasperated customers. Anyways, the company seems notable because it was created through the system, now that I see - Articles for Creation. The article was already clean, and I couldn't see any negative points mentioned. Maybe, it was removed by these so-called whitewashers. I had some more resources in hand, but I'm not sure if I want to continue editing that page. Might as well move on. What do you think? Teranair (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- I hope that you can see that your interest in a UK transportation company might come across as untypical for a professor of Literature. Especially when that the article on that company has been nominated for speedy deletion, been proposed for deletion, and earlier contributors have received warnings about a potential conflict of interest. Companies sometimes try whitewash their articles by hiring editors to remove what they perceive as criticism from an article to give it a more positive spin. We consider that a violation of our neutral point of view. Some of us monitor the job boards where such "gigs" are offered and try to identify the editors who engage in undisclosed paid editing. If this doesn't apply to you and if you have no conflict of interest, then all is well. Mduvekot (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Miyako Taxi for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miyako Taxi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miyako Taxi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Bejnar (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Storyful[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Storyful, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edwardx (talk) 00:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Ruby Nealon for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruby Nealon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruby Nealon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Aranya (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)