User talk:Telsho/Archives/2020/October
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Copperhead (DC Comics)
I did not make a test edit, my edit was intentional, as explained in the edit summary.
I removed what was a complete play-by-play description of the entire appearance of Copperhead in the video game. I believe it's too much detail. The plot summary of the game itself simply says "Batman chases the Joker to the Sionis Steel Mill, where he frees Black Mask and defeats the poisonous assassin Copperhead"; why should a reference to the game cover the plot in more detail than that?
The remaining detail is more than enough to explain to a reader what the character is like in this game and allow comparisons to other incarnations of the character. 147.147.59.218 (talk) 00:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Economy of East Asia
See talk page there 49.146.59.197 (talk) 10:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)I do not know whether you are a sock or not, but I see that you have been blocked for edit-warring, received warnings for edit-warring, has been dragged to 3RRN, and still continued edit-warring. I therefore blocked you for a week. If you want to continue editing Wikipedia after your block has expired, you need to learn to do it without resorting to edit-warring.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- I also see that you have contacted El_C off-wiki. Please do not contact me off-wiki, I prefer to keep all discussions on-wiki.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Telsho/Archives/2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ymblanter, I've been engaging in talk pages [1], [2], etc of these articles to try and come to an agreement. It doesn't help that the same user keeps reverting material that I'm involved in on unrelated articles and slaps templates on my talk page (even when no edit war is going on) to justify their own reverts, suggesting an ulterior motive. I even mentioned here that I don't wish to initiate edit wars. I also did not revert more than 3 times on any of this occasions, as I'm well aware of WP:3RR. Furthermore, the revert made on Economy of East Asia was restoring the diff made by a now blocked IP for disruptive editing, who also hurled personal attacks as we can see here, which was also blocked. (specific diff). However, I will definitely scale down on the reverts and wait for talk page discussions to conclude, which I'm intending to. Telsho (talk) 19:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC) *Well then...guess I'll just have to ride it out if some admins are going to make offhand blocks and subsequently ignore appeals. So much for "on-wiki discussions". ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Telsho (talk) 23:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline; only unblock requests on user talk pages are considered. If the archiving bot is set up to archive open unblock requests too quickly, you are welcome to fix that problem and make a new request with identical wording (or changed wording, if you prefer). Yamla (talk) 00:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Phillipines/Spain relations article
Hello you recently reverted the section featuring the comparisions between the countries on Phillipines-Spain relations. We should have a discussion before deciding if this stays or not. I personally think that it has some use at that page because remember this is wikipedia and the country's info should be readily avalible at the article to take into account. A person shouldn't have to dig through wikipedia to find certain information that presented on the page. Since Wikipedia's goal is to educate and elucidate people about the world around them. Certain statistics in the comparison could show how a country can have positive or negaive relations with each other such as religion where it shows both countries have a high catholic presence, Phillipines (80.6 %) Spain (60.9%).Things also like their trade bloc or type of government that's shown on the comparision people can also take into account. ֆօʍɛɮօɖʏǟռʏɮօɖʏ05 (talk) 23:10, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
Hello, I'm Robertsky. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Lee Kuan Yew seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 04:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite block
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Those frivolous speedy deletion tags are straight up hounding and harassment. I have blocked you indefinitely for this egregious misconduct. Note that an unblock appeal is unlikely to succeed unless you own up to what you did as well as convince the reviewing admin you will not repeat this or any other form of disruption in the future. El_C 18:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Telsho/Archives/2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I've definitely made some mistakes myself, especially when I first joined Wikipedia. That was done last month, when I was still getting the hang of it. However I agree that competency is definitely required as time goes on and I'll be extra careful moving forward. I've mostly avoided making CSD tags ever since, it's definitely not worth it. If you see me getting involved in edit wars or making frivolous tags like that again, you're more than welcome to straight up block me indefinitely again without any chances of an appeal. I'm just someone who's really passionate on creating (so far, I think I've created around 5) and editing articles like many others on this website and I wish to continue doing that in a more productive manner. Thanks, and I hope I could be given a final chance to prove myself. Telsho (talk) 18:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I agree with the below comments. This request doesn't show that you understand the severity of the situation, and in fact it rather disingenuously brushes it off as you being the misguided growing pains of a passionate new user. You attempted maliciously attempted to cause damage to the project for the sole purpose of harassing another editor. And given your hostile comment towards Phil Bridger, it's not believable that you went through a rough patch and now have had a change of heart. The hostile and aggressive attitude is still pretty evident. Advise you to consult the WP:GAB. ~Swarm~ {sting} 00:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I'm sorry to say, but both here as well as on the ANI thread, you completely fail to acknowledge that this constituted hounding and harassment. That is the key thing to address at this point. That, couple with the overall WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior in the ANI report of which you are the author, does not I'm afraid to say, inspire confidence that it is worthwhile to allow you to continue editing at this time. The endless conflicts and disruption, it's just too much. El_C 20:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Telsho, I note that you have been banned, and I would just like to say that I do not feel your battleground behavior against HEB was justified, and that you may have been too bold in the BRD process in redirecting pages or nominating them for deletion. While I understand that edit conflicts can lead to hot-headedness, I would honestly recommend that one takes a step back and reconsider that at the end of the day, it's just an online encyclopedia. I am not a perfect person either, but I always take the initiative to open a discussion and not allow my opinion on a single article to contaminate my relationship with another user. I honestly hope you can come back with a refreshed mindset, and regardless of whatever ill-will which existed between you and HEB, apologise to them for marking their articles for deletion out of spite. I am not aware of your edit conflicts with other users, but Wikipedia is not about winning or losing. All the best. Seloloving (talk) 07:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Seloloving: Hi, thank you for your encouraging comments. Yeah, I understand where you're getting from, it definitely was and still is not worth it to get all feisty over an online encyclopedia. I hope the ongoing talk page discussion that you started on behalf of all of us in regards to the lead section will conclude effectively with everyone agreeing to a compromise. Good luck to you too. Telsho (talk) 08:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Telsho, I note that you have been banned, and I would just like to say that I do not feel your battleground behavior against HEB was justified, and that you may have been too bold in the BRD process in redirecting pages or nominating them for deletion. While I understand that edit conflicts can lead to hot-headedness, I would honestly recommend that one takes a step back and reconsider that at the end of the day, it's just an online encyclopedia. I am not a perfect person either, but I always take the initiative to open a discussion and not allow my opinion on a single article to contaminate my relationship with another user. I honestly hope you can come back with a refreshed mindset, and regardless of whatever ill-will which existed between you and HEB, apologise to them for marking their articles for deletion out of spite. I am not aware of your edit conflicts with other users, but Wikipedia is not about winning or losing. All the best. Seloloving (talk) 07:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)