User talk:TelegramSam1234

Possibly unfree Image:C4690407q74-1-.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:C4690407q74-1-.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kate Isitt.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Kate Issit.JPG. The copy called Image:Kate Issit.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:IsItLegal.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:IsItLegal.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Death In Hounslow[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Death In Hounslow, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.spongey.net/kateisitt/death_guide.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 00:07, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:E996033jij9.jpg[edit]

Why have you asserted that you own the image when you clearly do not? Please care to select correct tags in future. The JPS ^{talk to me} 17:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kate Isitt.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kate Isitt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:DIS Titles.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:DIS Titles.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

Death In Hounslow[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Death In Hounslow, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. shoy 20:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whodunnit? (Is It Legal episode)[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Whodunnit? (Is It Legal episode), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. shoy 20:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Whodunnit? (Is It Legal episode)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Whodunnit? (Is It Legal episode), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whodunnit? (Is It Legal episode). Thank you. shoy 21:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove AFD templates. If you wish to make your case as to why the article should be kept, please make it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whodunnit? (Is It Legal episode). shoy 21:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List of Is It Legal? episodes[edit]

A tag has been placed on List of Is It Legal? episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 16:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of Is It Legal? characters. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 15:19, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List of Is It Legal? episodes[edit]

A tag has been placed on List of Is It Legal? episodes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 15:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Is It Legal? characters[edit]

List of Is It Legal? characters, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of Is It Legal? characters satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Is It Legal? characters and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of Is It Legal? characters during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 18:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Is It Legal? episodes[edit]

I have nominated List of Is It Legal? episodes, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Is It Legal? episodes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 18:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC) ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 18:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Death In Hounslow[edit]

Nomination of List of Is It Legal? episodes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Is It Legal? episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Is It Legal? episodes (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spinixster (chat!) 08:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]