User talk:Tchadienne

Unrelated incident another user needs to deal with since you blocked me[edit]

An anon added (pbuh) to Qiyamah. Please revert the edit and explain that honorifics are not used on Wikipedia. KI 18:20, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked. Please do not ask for proxy edits via the {{helpme}} template. Thanks, Tangot a ngo 04:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative abuse, policy violations, and vandalism[edit]

The following is an ongoing list of users who have either violated policy, abused their administrative power, or just outright vandalized Wikipedia in the Vicente Fox incident.

Bunchograpes[edit]

User:Bunchograpes
- Page:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74667014&oldid=74665751
  - Type of policy violation: Though I was incivil, I never violated WP:NPA as Bunchographes falsely accuses me of doing here; encouragement of unjustified talkpage protection

Joseph Solis in Australia[edit]

User: Joseph Solis in Australia
- Page:LX Legislature of the Mexican Congress
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LX_Legislature_of_the_Mexican_Congress&diff=74685940&oldid=74060753
  - Type of policy violation: WP:RS - Unsourced alteration of date

- Page:Vicente Fox
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=73727819&oldid=73707740
  - Type of vandalism: Addition of numerous unsourced and highly pov statements ridiculing several politicians after WP:BLP was enforced.

- Page:Vicente Fox
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=74865328&oldid=74825583
  - Type of policy violation: Vandalism - Amazingly after CBD protected and reverted the page and insisted that WP:BLP and WP:RS were going to be enforced, JSA restored the page to the version prior to my editing.

- Page:Vicente Fox
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=74651397&oldid=74642738
  - Type of policy violation: Wikipedia:Vandalism. Look at the diff. Look at the edit summary... and no one blocked him... or even warned him...

- Page:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74640915&oldid=74640882
  - Type of policy violation: False accusations of sockpuppetry. The sockpuppet in question was clearly a strawman sockpuppet used by Chacor.

- Page:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74650332&oldid=74650183
  - Type of policy violation: Vandalism - an attempt to coverup his past policy violations

- Page:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74652718&oldid=74652058
  - Type of policy violation: Encourages attempts to silence me by calling for a completely unjustified protection of my talkpage

- Page:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  - Diff:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74667644&oldid=74667583
  - Type of policy violation: WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF

Captainktainer[edit]

User: Captainktainer
- Page:Talk:Vicente Fox
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AVicente_Fox&diff=74698256&oldid=74677007
  - Type of policy violation: Instructs editors to ignore vandalism and policy violations

Pgk[edit]

User: Pgk
- Page:Talk:Vicente Fox
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AVicente_Fox&diff=74569702&oldid=74569364
  - Type of policy violation: WP:CIVIL, knowingly misinterpreting WP:RS

- Page: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ya ya ya ya ya ya
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74865659&oldid=74745603
  - Type of policy violation: Lying about me “admitting” I was using sockpuppets; falsely calling Mackensen’s vandalism on the same page a "timing issue"

Centrx[edit]

Centrx
- Page:Ya ya ya ya ya ya
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74792530&oldid=73355141
  - Type of policy violation: Vandalism, lying about my account being a sockpuppet with the false edit summary: "Proven Sockpuppet blocked"

- Page:User talk:Freestylefrappe
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74801149&oldid=74800937
  - Type of policy violation: False accusation of WP:NPA violation; in an effort to silence me, Centrx protected my talkpage with no justification and the untruthful edit summary "Abuse of helpme and attacks."

- Page:User talk:Freestylefrappe
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74801237&oldid=74801149
  - Type of policy violation: Vandalism, in an effort to coverup the evidence I had presented proving the guilt of the other parties involved, Centrx reverts all my evidence.

TenOfAllTrades[edit]

TenOfAllTrades
- Page:User talk:Ya ya ya ya ya ya
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74815048&oldid=74801237
  - Type of policy violation: False accusations of sockpuppetry, false accusations of historical block evasion, unjustified indefinite block of account after Mike Halterman attempted and was berated for the same thing

- Page:User talk:Tchadienne
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_arbitration&diff=74824829&oldid=74824722
  - Type of policy violation: False accusations of sockpuppetry, false accusations of block evasion, false suggestion in his edit summary of "Explanation of block: extensive use of sockpuppets"

Mindspillage[edit]

User:Mindspillage
- Page:Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_arbitration&diff=74824829&oldid=74824722
  - Type of policy violation: False accusations of engaging in disruptive activities, trying to enforce double standards against me, and implicitly lying about me using sockpuppets. No attempt to point out his vote to me was ever made, so as to prevent me from providing diffs to show my side of the "case."

Mackensen[edit]

User:Mackensen

- Page:Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ya ya ya ya ya ya
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74728367&oldid=74710126
  - Type of policy violation:Lyingly implies that he has confirmed I'm using sockpuppets, by interpreting Tchadienne is a sockpuppet I used. The fact that this edit was not, and still has not been reverted, and Mackensen still has not been blocked, is an outrage. An arbitration case isnt even necessary. He should be desysopped on this evidence alone.

For the record: The last fucking time I edited under the Tchadienne account was August 9. Check my contribs and stop peddling this lie.

- Page:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/incidents
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74782811&oldid=74782254
  - Type of policy violation: Deliberate misinterpretation of the concept of "block evasion"

- Page:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/incidents
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74800280&oldid=74797250
  - Type of policy violation: Makes his vendetta against me, and his desire to violate the right to vanish, abundantly clear

- Page:[[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Chacor]
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FChacor&diff=74725946&oldid=74701055
  - Type of policy violation: Attempt to coverup Chacor's sockpuppetry, WP:POINT

Ryulong[edit]

Ryulong
- Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=74678246&oldid=74678221
  - Type of policy violation: WP:RS, WP:BLP, WP:AGF, WP:OWN (in the sense that he is insisting Hseldon10 owns this page), and false accusations of vandalism against 208.180.242.96

- Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:208.180.242.96&oldid=74678249
  - Type of policy violation: Falsely accusing 208.180.242.96 of vandalism

- Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74693671&oldid=74690133
  - Type of policy violation: WP:AGF. I wanted to thank him for a particularly good edit to a Japan-related article.

Thatcher131[edit]

User:Thatcher131
- Page:Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ya ya ya ya ya ya
- Diff:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74637099&oldid=74636617
  - Type of policy violation: Incorrect interpretation of WP:3RR, though this was not intentional, and may have come from not realizing this case largely involved WP:BLP violations

Mike Halterman[edit]

User:Mike H.
- Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FChacor&diff=74649302&oldid=74649062
  - Type of policy violation: Lyingly states I have some sort of "grievance against Chacor." Instructs users to go by double standards and ignore my request for a Checkuser proving Chacor's sockpuppetry.

- Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FChacor&diff=74650343&oldid=74649886
  - Type of policy violation: Blocks me for 48 hours for "disruption" while leaving the door open for an extension. This act demands an immediate desysopping.

Page:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
- Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74653272&oldid=74653083
  - Type of policy violation: After he indefinitely blocked me, he posted this: "He wasn't using the blocking time for what I intended, instead trying to stir up more shit with myself, Chacor, and other editors. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 03:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"[reply]

Page:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
- Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74667583&oldid=74667538
- Type:After Bunchograpes, a user I have never, and probably will never get along with, pointed out that indefinitely blocking me for three edits to my talkpage was "unjustified," Mike H refuses to adjust the block and incorrectly uses the terminology "rollback" demonstrating a bizarre ignorance of the most basic of admin tools.

Lar[edit]

User:Lar
- Page:User talk:Freestylefrappe
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFreestylefrappe&diff=74913628&oldid=74905189
  - Type of policy violation: WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, WP:NPA, trying to coverup the evidence I have so far presented

Tony Sidaway[edit]

User:Tony Sidaway
- Page:User talk:Freestylefrappe
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFreestylefrappe&diff=74914410&oldid=74914302
  - Type of policy violation: WP:CIVIL, false accusations of sockpuppeteering, attempt to coverup evidence

- Page:User talk:Freestylefrappe
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFreestylefrappe&diff=74917680&oldid=74917547
  - Type of policy violation: False accusation of personal attacks

- Page:User talk:Freestylefrappe
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFreestylefrappe&diff=74917767&oldid=74917680
  - Type of policy violation: Unjustified page protection

- Page:User talk:Freestylefrappe
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFreestylefrappe&diff=74917840&oldid=74917767
  - Type of policy violation: False accusation of personal attacks

Telex[edit]

User:Telex
- Page:Albanians in the Republic of Macedonia
  - Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albanians_in_the_Republic_of_Macedonia&diff=74913666&oldid=73844201
  - Type of policy violation: False accusations of sockpuppeteering, Vandalism

Institute for Global Engagement[edit]

I've nominated this article to AfD - it's an orphaned article, with no attmept to establish the notability of the subject. Normally, this would be tagged {{prod}} or even speedied, but due to its age, it seemed best to give the author a chance to expand it - Tiswas^(t/c) 10:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]