User talk:Tabercil/Archive 19

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nelson Peltz may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • jpg|thumb|upright|right|Will and Nicola Peltz at the 2014 Toronto International Film Festival]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:37, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Travis Milne may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | caption = Milne at the 2014 [[Toronto International Film Festival]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fred Armisen may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • = Fred Armisen at 2014 Imagen Awards.jpg|thumb|Fred Armisen at 2014 Imagen Foundation Awards]]
  • and sketches introduced 2004–2005#Nuni and Nuni Schoener, Art Dealers|The Schoeners]]" sketches)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop changing photo in nick palance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rthemelis (talk • contribs) 02:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Josefina López, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Wrestling moves subcategories

Hi Tabercil, I noticed that a few of your pictures were classified as "Professional wrestling attacks" in Commons. Just like to inform you that there are more categories within Professional wrestling moves, including PW throws, PW aerial techniques, Pin (professional wrestling) and subcategories like PW kicks, Backbreaker etc. Thanks again for all your photos! :) starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 04:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

I know - it's just that at the upload point, that's the category I can most easily remember. I do like to make a pass through every so often to recat stuff that's in the various upper categories and drive them into proper subcats. Tabercil (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
@Starship.paint:Of course, that's assuming they go into the right category to begin with - ahem. Here. Tabercil (talk) 13:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I understand where you're coming from (about the upload point). I just recategorized a lot of stuff so you shouldn't need to make a pass in some time. If I may suggest, you upload to "Professional wrestling moves" instead of "attacks", firstly it is the parent category (throws is a subset of moves but isn't a subset of attacks) and secondly there are fewer pictures in "moves" than "attacks", so less to go through when re-categorizing. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 01:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Sunny Leone

FYI, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Improvingthepen. Dismas|(talk) 17:02, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

K - sockpuppet still had a point in retrospect in that the article had be semi'd for quite some time. Tabercil (talk) 21:42, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Agreed. Dismas|(talk) 14:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

?

Hey, at Sasha Grey you removed a picture I added a while back without saying why. So, why? (The other things were explained) Ping me. –DangerousJXD (talk) 00:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Jasmin

Dear Tabercil,

I asked Jasmin Areebi on her Twitter account (@IsntSHELOVELY_4) and she commented that she don't like her current Wikipedia page picture (see screenshots on Imgur.com here and here) and she asked if I can use the photo below on her article.

Can we please use the photo requested instead? She's gave me permission to use it. (See proof in the other Imgur screenshots here and here aswell).

This is the photo she would like to use.


Kind Regards, Mason Moore. Contact me at User talk:MasonWikia — Preceding undated comment added 17:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

  • That's not my shot - the pics we currently have on the article are. That's why we can use them. Now she's in luck - I have a idea who's shot that is that she wants. I'll check with Steve to see if indeed it indeed his, and if he's willing & able to license it for use on Wikipedia. Tabercil (talk) 21:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Simona Halep

I've hit my 3 reverts limit, undoing anonymous edits, all chronicled in the talk page. Please carry on the torch if you have some time. Thanks. Adrian two (talk) 01:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Wish you'd issued warnings with each revert - would've made it easier to take further action. Tabercil (talk) 21:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
How would I do that? Adrian two (talk) 02:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Jessie McKay

Hi Tabercil, just informing you, McKay has signed with WWE, reported to developmental! I'm glad I improved that article! starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 00:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)






UserGogo212121 Hello Tabercil of which license upload photos on wikipedia --Gogo212121 (talk) 15:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WWE TLC 2014 in Demand poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WWE TLC 2014 in Demand poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I realized the mistake after I did it, and changed it back. But thanks for the smart-ass f@!#ing message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TMLinville (talk • contribs) 17:54, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Hardcore, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mike Bennett and John Hennigan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Holly Sweet

The article Holly Sweet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No independent reliable sourcing. No claim of notability. No biographical content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 18:11, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Request

Hi there. Concerning your decision to block an IP editor without properly checking the issue at hand, I would like to inform you that I have replied to the accusations here. Could it perhaps be that you have not properly looked at the issue at hand? If you're going to block me for edit wars, how about the Editor who openly admitted to have violated against WP:3R himself? He remains unblocked and is allowed to impose his preferred version of how Wikipedia articles on TV series should look like, by hiding the Episode headline from the table of content? Before you block someone, IP editor or registered editor, you must look at the issue at hand. There is more here than just WP:3R. I am not appealing the block. I am asking you to please require from the reporting editor a Wikipedia policy or guideline which allows him to alter Wikipedia TV series articles by hiding the Episodes headline from the table of content. Thank you. 77.4.168.182 (talk) 12:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

This user is using different IPs to avoid their block. I believe this is against the sock puppet policy, am I right? Alex|The|Whovian 13:01, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Allegra Versace

Just wanted to invite you to take a look at this weeks TAFI article Allegra Versace. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:17, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

I don't see what the problem is.

I'm changing the times back to the correct timing! What's wrong with that??? Untitled SaVage (talk) 00:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Simple. What's your source?? Tabercil (talk) 08:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Why do we need a source if we can time the matches ourselves? Plus, its annoying when users edit the matches with incorrect timing. I'm aware that it shouldn't matter that much, but it does to me. Untitled SaVage (talk) 22:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Why do we need a source if we can time the matches ourselves? Plus, its annoying when users edit the matches with incorrect timing. I'm aware that it shouldn't matter that much, but it does to me. Untitled SaVage (talk) 22:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Why do we need a source if we can time the matches ourselves? Plus, its annoying when users edit the matches with incorrect timing. I'm aware that it shouldn't matter that much, but it does to me. Untitled SaVage (talk) 22:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

TAFI

If you want to, take a look at the article about Marie Serneholt which is this weeks TAFI article. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Oba Chandler

If you find time for it, please take a look at the article about Oba Chandler. It is a article that I have edited a lot over the years. So any improvements etc are welcomed. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 09:29, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for clearing the "election" vandalism Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

NP. Part of why they hand out the brooms. :) Tabercil (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello

I was told that an article that was deleted had some information in it that I might be able to use in another article I created, Animal attacks. The name of the deleted article was Nicole Moore. Could you pop it into a Bfpage user page so that I can see if the info is something I can put into another article? I'll delete it when I'm done. Thanks and Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  20:44, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Here we go again...

So, you're telling me that I'm on the verge of being banned from editing from inserting the correct match timings? Does that appear to be an act of deliberate destruction to the article? Not to mention the simpletons that edit these articles with the most inaccurate information. But when I make an attempt to fix some of these inaccuracies, I receive a threatening notification in the process. Do any of them have the sources to solidify their edits? Do you know for sure that specifically MY information is incorrect? I'm sick of you always sticking your nose into my business. Please, stay out of my case. Untitled SaVage (talk) 07:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shine Wrestling events, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taylor Made. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Requesting to join a debate for James Stunt

@Tabercil: I'm requesting you to join this Afd discussion. Your comment is valuable to us. Please help us reach a consensus. Thanks -Khocon (talk) 19:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Requesting to join a debate for James Stunt

@Tabercil: I'm requesting you to join this Afd discussion. Your comment is valuable to us. Please help us reach a consensus. Thanks -Khocon (talk) 19:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Hazel Tucker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hazel Tucker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazel Tucker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 16:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Fast Lane 2015

Please note that your edit has been reversed when you rightly said there was no such decision. There is an argument over this on the Professional wrestling talk page. I've left the dispute now because I can't edit that page and I'm being accused falsely of being a sock of Mega Z090 (he's already asked for a checkuser - and my modem re-booted again much to my annoyance). The word "technical" should be taken out completely. It's either a submission or a knockout. The user WHWC seems to be an opinion pusher with no respect for the rules or original research. 101.182.127.166 (talk) 06:43, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your comment on that talk page! My bloody modem re-booted AGAIN (what is going on with that thing?) but I hope you keep an eye on it in case those users try to insert that rubbish again. Marry Christmas! 101.182.144.48 (talk) 04:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm sure i added context but it was meant to be "weight as of ROH Final battle?" is this not ok? I watched it and noticed different weights thought i'd be helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcoles92 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Help

Can you explain more?

I watch ROH / NXT regularly and I know all the weights

Many are outdated here. What can I do? Feel I watch enough, why else would I edit?

Mcoles92 (talk) 12:03, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Vanessa Rousso

Ignoring the fact the Daily Mail is not a reliable source, nothing in that article, or her Twitter, states that she is either lesbian or bisexual. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 02:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hmm?? AfterEllen identified her as a lesbian - see here. And she has posted on Twitter about that - see here. Plus see this interview: "I hope that at least opened minds up as to what it means to be in a lesbian relationship". She is a lesbian. Tabercil (talk) 03:49, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Krysti Lynn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krysti Lynn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krysti Lynn (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 23:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

How to request a photo

A number of years ago, I remember running across a how-to article of sorts that sort of spelled out the steps to requesting a photo from a notable person. I can't remember if it was a WP guideline or if it was something that was just on someone's userpage. Since you have uploaded a number of notable people's photographs, I thought that user might have been you. Does this sound familiar? Dismas|(talk) 20:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Yup - see WP:REQFREE. It's overkill in a few places but it's a solid start on how to go about getting pics. Tabercil (talk) 01:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

revdel

Appreciate that. TimothyJosephWood 23:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

NP. Tabercil (talk) 02:26, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

ANNE WHITE

I received a message that you removed the changes that were made to Anne White's page. Please reinstate the revisions as they were made at Anne White's request with her involvement. Please advise on how to proceed and if she needs to intervene she is happy to do so. Thank you, ----- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosseditorial (talk • contribs) 02:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

@Rosseditorial: Nope. What you did during your edit is remove every citation present in the article. That's a huge no-no. From the Wikipedia policy on verifiability: "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." What you did was made it harder for anyone else to verify the article's contents. Tabercil (talk) 02:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

ANNE WHITE more

Thank you for your response. Please advise what Anne White should do because much of the information was not correct and she was not pleased with it. Under the policy on verifiability how does a subject correct their own page? Thank you. ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosseditorial (talk • contribs) 02:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Take a look at WP:AUTO - that's the Wikipedia policy regarding editing of an article by the subject of the article. That gives a good outline of what she can do in this instance. Tabercil (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melody (Spanish singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miami Film Festival. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Eric Young (wrestler)

Re: Eric Young (wrestler), the user that added that info User:Wrestlinginsider is under an SNI for being a sock of User:MatthewTardiff. MatthewTardiff was blocked for making that exact same edit without providing a source. CrashUnderride 03:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello

Hi, could you ban User:Hesam1323 and also his IP(2.177.72.214). He keeps putting information in the main article for Ramin Djawadi. Even though those informaions are already in List of works by Ramin Djawadi. - AffeL (talk) 22:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Ah, no. Not at this time. A ban appears to be quite the over-reaction. Tabercil (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Pooja Hegde

Pooja Hegde
I thought Wiki was about bringing out the truth to general public and not the usual untouchable celeb worship. I still believe that no matter how controversial a piece of info maybe,it should be strictly verified.Maybe you have missed out on my references of Qnet official website www.thev-net and arrest of her father in Qnet case published in popular daily.Never mind,next time we will come with even more authentic news and will post here. Jitumoni1995 (talk) 16:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
The key is whether or not the sources in question are reliable - for the most part, what you used aren't good enough for a BLP article. Tabercil (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Pooja Hegde

Pooja Hegde
I take your point about the sources but when one is investigating a world wide scam involving a company operating online, that is the exactly the source which is available.This is the third time they have come to con our country with a new name with the help of celebrities. Police is investigating evidence based on twitter facebook n youtube videos provided by us and will hopefully investigate her like her father Manjunath Jitumoni1995 (talk) 17:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Tabercil. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Tabercil.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tabercil. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Amy Ried for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amy Ried is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Ried (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
  • Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
  • The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Dana Rosendorff

The edits made to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Rosendorff have all been cited from credible sources. Why would you continue to remove information that has been citied and verified?Amanda Rose1 (talk) 01:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

It's not a question of sourcing, it's a question of tone. We are an encyclopedia and we aim for a tone that suits it. What you've been contributing is more akin to the prose that's found in People magazine. And why do you keep removing the photo we have of Dana? It's the most recent free issue one we have of her. Tabercil (talk) 05:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Tina Tyler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tina Tyler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Tyler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 15:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

Administrator changes

added Doug Bell • Dennis Brown • Clpo13 • ONUnicorn
removed ThaddeusB • Yandman • Bjarki S • OldakQuill • Shyam • Jondel • Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Changes made to a television show page

The changes I've made to the "American Crime Story" page are valid, as I currently work on the television show. There is evidently another person, who does not work on the show, making changes that are incorrect. As an employee with first-hand information, I've been correcting those mistakes each time I see them. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.205.234.15 (talk) 17:47, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps, yet we require a reliable soource for that change. You're not providing it. Tabercil (talk) 11:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes

added Happyme22 • Dragons flight
removed Zad68

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
  • A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
  • Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Martina Warren for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martina Warren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martina Warren until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 21:36, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

Administrator changes

added Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
removed Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Cathy Barry

Hi. I noticed that several years ago you voted in favour of keeping the article on UK porn star Cathy Barry. A few months ago it was deleted with only 3 votes in favour - evidently very few editors noticed. Would appreciate it if you could help, as it seems bizarre that an article on a clearly notable figure can just be deleted on the say so of so few editors?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.18.55.1 (talk) 11:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

Administrator changes

added Nakon • Scott
removed Sverdrup • Thespian • Elockid • James086 • Ffirehorse • Celestianpower • Boing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
  • Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
  • In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

  • Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carlos Valdes (actor)

The article Carlos Valdes (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Student actor with no independent sources nor claim to notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pincrete (talk) 07:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

added Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem
removed Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
  • A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

American Crime Story: The Assassination of Gianni Versace

I work in the Production office on "American Crime Story: The Assassination of Gianni Versace" and someone keeps changing the cast page to reflect wildly inaccurate information about our main cast. This person clearly does not have any association with our television show, as one of the actor's (Max Greenfield) character name is completely incorrect (despite media articles echoing the information - the references are unfortunately inaccurate as well). The editor also continues to include actors who have been guest cast on the show (one or two episodes), but are quite far from being part of our main cast (Annaleigh Ashford and Nico Evers-Swindell). I've been correcting these inaccuracies as frequently as possible only to have the corrections reversed to reveal the incorrect information once more. As I've previously mentioned, I literally work ON the show and see the scripts and schedules firsthand. My source is me, and the media has not yet been informed of our final main/guest cast members. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.205.234.15 (talk) 02:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Saw your previous note and understand the policy, but letting you know that the media sources are incorrect in their articles stating that Max is playing Santo. He is not. He plays a character named Ronnie. And Annaleigh and Nico are NOT main cast members. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.205.234.15 (talk) 03:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Gary Graver image

Hi, Tabercil. I looked around and was able to find/make a free image of Gary Graver. However, it's a screenshot of a low resolution "home movie" (making of a movie he filmed), so much worse quality than the non-free one that you got. What do you think, should we replace the non-free one with this one in our article? --GRuban (talk) 21:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC) Yup. In fact we have to. If you look at the rationale behind the non-free image it states: "A free image may not exist, but in the event of a free image being located for this person in the future, this image should be deleted as soon as possible.". You've found a free image, so we're pretty much obligated to use it. Tabercil (talk) 22:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gary Graver.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gary Graver.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

Administrator changes

added Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93
removed Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite

Technical news

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tabercil. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tabercil/Archive_19&oldid=1140405043"