User talk:TRTX/Archive 4
You've deleted my comment regarding Guitar Hero controller for Wii compatibility for Rock Band Track Pack 1, saying This information is better suited elsewhere.. Please advise as to where you think it would be better suited -- seeing as this is the only place the Track Pack products are discussed. --Maurice.powell (talk) 12:04, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
The official title of the game is "Saw: The Video Game". just curious, what is your source for this? The best I can find for "official" is "Saw: The Videogame". –xeno (talk) 14:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
RB Tiers[edit]
I think your approach is fine - Only suggestion would be to make the actual tier display templates become sub-templates under the main template (to avoid cluttering Template: span). With that, I would then suggest to sandbox a portion of a songlist table to see how it comes out and then offer it for general input to editors to see if it flies. --MASEM 23:12, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- I made a lengty post on the talk page for Rock Band 2 songs. I strongly believe the difficulties should be kept on there. Take a look at it and let me know what you think Wakamex (talk) 04:14, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Rock Band Track Pack img Deletion[edit]
On Oct. 24 you deleted an image: here citing a rule regarding unused images. The image in question however was being used in AC/DC Live: Rock Band Track Pack: Demonstrated here. In fact, a bot had to come in and clean up the reference here because the image had been deleted out from under the article. -- TRTX T / C 13:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- I hit the wrong deletion reason — the image was in fact deleted because it lacked a rationale explaining how it qualifes as fair use. I have restored it and redeleted it with the right reason. Stifle (talk) 13:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Rock band.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Rock band.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 13:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Is this deletion really necessary? You and I both have sandboxed versions of the RB table in our userspaces and what he's trying to do seems like the same thing. An MfD for this seems to me like a waste of time. Oren0 (talk) 17:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
"See talk page for reasoning"[edit]
[1] Where on the talk page? EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- You'd have to look through the archives. It's been discussed here for example. If we have the exact number one week, we need to keep updating it, which seems both annoying and indiscriminate. Oren0 (talk) 04:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Image at List of Rock Band track packs[edit]
Hey, I notice you keep removing this image saying "see talk." Can you point me where you think there's a consensus to keep this image out? All I see is Talk:List_of_Rock_Band_track_packs#images, where 2/3 editors support including it. Oren0 (talk) 07:07, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Uber Awesome Award Nominee[edit]
Hey dude, for your many contributions, awesome user boxes, and cool sandboxes, you are one of the January 2009 Uber Awesome Award Nominees. Estemshorn (talk) 22:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
|
January '09 Uber Awesome Award Nominee | |
| Congratulations, TRTX, You've been nominated!!!!! Estemshorn (talk) 05:40, 22 December 2008 (UTC) |
AfD nomination for List of Xbox 360 games and List of cooperative games for the Xbox 360[edit]
I've reverted your edits to List of Xbox 360 games as I believe you were on the wrong page. You might be looking for List of cooperative games for the Xbox 360 instead. If you were trying to nominate List of Xbox 360 games for deletion, then the template you used should have been {{subst:Afd}} (without any additional parameters) on List of Xbox 360 games followed by creating Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Xbox 360 games (or use this preloaded debate to create the page). Though I don't know why you'd want to list List of Xbox 360 games for deletion. Anyway... it does appear that you did nominate List of cooperative games for the Xbox 360 for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cooperative games for the Xbox 360 correctly. --Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 05:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
My apologies for that statement. I used a poor link and term to get the point I was trying to get across across. I responded on my talk page in detail. Thanks for taking the time to work with this and I am sure we will be working together on xbox and other gaming articles in the future as I ramp my involvment in this project back up. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 15:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry that I had to close this as "keep". I didn't much care for the accusations that your nomination was in bad faith but with all the comments, suggestions, and back and forth, only you and one other editor were arguing for deletion. This could not have been closed as "delete". My suggestion would be to push for a merge to Criticism of George W. Bush as was suggested by some editors. An AFD close decision to "merge" might have made sense but there were too many arguments for flat out keeping or "keep and do something else". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Push[edit]
For a better explained rationale for why I removed the dab links (and subsequently reverted your re-addition of them), see Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Usage guidelines. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 03:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's all good. I'm sure at one time both films were called "Push", and that can create some confusion if you don't realize that those pages have been disambiguated. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 01:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
User Dingaww[edit]
The track pack is free for now but this year is going to put on a disc as rock bands track pack vol 3 thats why i have listed it under the track packs page and i plan on putting it back again I know this info to be right as I'm a beta tester for ea games and I have one of the vol 3 track pack discs to test it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dingaww (talk • contribs) 20:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- You have absolutely no source for this change except for your own word. It will be treated as vandalism until you are able to provide a reliable source supporting your change. -- TRTX T / C 21:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Smile![edit]
Estemshorn (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Barnstar[edit]
|
The VG Barnstar | |
| Given for extensive good editing on ''Rock Band'' related articles. Child.harrow (talk) 15:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC) |
Sort order of artists' names[edit]
Heads up: let's talk about the the sort order of artists' names in the list of RB downloadable songs. travisl (talk) 21:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Rock Band DLC Pricing[edit]
Hey, I made a chart detailing the cost of each pack in the article List of downloadable songs for the Rock Band series You happened to delete it on the grounds that there are no sources. The reason I did not add sources is because it is factual information. If one goes to to Playstation Store or Xbox Marketplace, that person will see that the info I added in the chart is correct. I was merely attempting to assist RB players by offering them this otherwise unarchived pricing information in one convenient chart, and make the Pricing section more concise overall. However, I can easily obtain sources if needed. If you restore the edit I made, I will do so promptly.
-TheBlackening
P.S. Forgive me for any formatting mistakes I may have made in this section, for I am not familiar with Wikipedia's customs yet.
- I know it's factual information, but being not sourced makes it Original Research. ESTEMSHORNtalkSign 05:26, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
dcgeist (Pulp Fiction)[edit]
Dcgeist loves starting edit wars and enjoys being nasty to other users. Is there anything that can be done to control his negative urges? B. Fairbairn (talk) 13:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
My Edit[edit]
I wasn't trying to change anything he wrote I changed the time in hope that it would archive. I'm not an expert at all in this Wiki stuff and I am sorry if what I did was wrong but if you or someone else could fix it I would appreciate it.Gunter79 (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Requests for comment[edit]
Hi TRTX, I'm interested in doing a piece on the RFC process for teh signpost. Given you recently opened an RFC at Pulp Fiction, I was wondering if you'd be willing to talk about that experience? Hiding T 12:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Saw VI scores[edit]
On the Saw VI page I noticed you reverted the reception per Scores that don't even break 50% are not "mixed" or "Varied". They are bad reviews.
So are we just going by Rotten Tomatoes and Metacrtic scores, or all the reviews? Thanks. --Mike Allen talk · contribs 04:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Ah I see. However, the section currently only list positive reviews, with "negative" scores. Perhaps some negative reviews should be added to balance it out? --Mike Allen talk · contribs 01:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
"Second in command" Power Ranger and Male/Female Rangers[edit]
While I thank you for removing the "Second-in-command" successions out of the articles (The PROO Yellow Ranger was actually explicitly stated as being such), your statement that stating whether or not a particular Blue, Yellow, or White Ranger is male or female is not "overspecification" as these characters are oddities amongst the others, and can very well be specifically stated as being different.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- I removed the Male/Female because it seemed to be not only needlessly specific...but also in a way sexist. Implying that any one color/gender assignment is the "norm" of the series when there's been a number of colors that have been flip flopped between genders. I could see calling out Ninja Storm (or Alien Rangers) as being the first American series to deviate from the more traditional assignments (with Tori as Blue and Dustin as Yellow), and also referencing Charlie from SPD as the first EVER female Red Ranger (American series or Sentai) -- TRTX T / C 01:18, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- The color/gender assignment is in fact a norm when it comes to the American productions. The original Japanese production is different. Thus when there is more than one exception to that established norm, they can be listed separately. Also, the internal leadership succession makes things confusing (Taylor was the leader of the WF Rangers until Cole appeared; Sky became the SPD Red Ranger after Jack, and then Bridge became the SPD Red after that) but I think I've fixed that.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:25, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry[edit]
Sorry about that, I didn't know where would be the best place to do this. I wasn't about to do it on the SPI page itself, as I didn't feel that it was appropriate to do so. I'm completely willing to do it where you think it is appropriate to do so. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 07:27, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- After looking at the IPs, a user would have to do some serious travelling if they were voting at that AFD. I think there is one suspicious one, but it's not much of a concern. My suspicions rose when an account and IP that haven't edited for years suddenly popped up at a deletion debate. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Heads up about Plus version[edit]
Talk:Green Day: Rock Band#Release date, pricing, additional info...
You probably would have seen it anyway, but I figured that I'd give you a heads up about it regardless; there's a possibility that the sources I found are confused about the six songs for the Plus edition. (which I'll likely get anyway, since I don't have any of the existing Green Day DLC) EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Response from Recliner Man about RBN[edit]
Where do you guys talk? I can't find the main discussion area. At any rate, I do make it a point to confirm each song with Harmonix in one way or another. So I never just throw up a whole bunch of random songs because I feel like it. -- Recliner Man 21:14, 23 March 2010 (UTC time) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Recliner Man (talk • contribs)
Jimi Hendrix[edit]
You see, it turned out it was a single. Unless you are 1000% percent sure next time and the source is very clear about it, do not revert those edits again.--F-22 RaptörAces High♠ 19:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, maybe I did come on a little hard, but don't tell me I didn't read the source, because I did read through the source, and it said "along with the single", it didn't say anything about included. That's why I wasn't sure, and because I wasn't sure, the most logical solution would've been to say TBD, you've decided that it was part of the album despite my hesitation that it wasn't.--F-22 RaptörAces High♠ 03:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- I think you've missed the part about why I am uncertain. Notice the single part of the source, and that is enough to convince me that the part you have bolded isn't solid enough. I should've asked for a third opinion at the time, but something possessed me to stop with reverting exchange, which I shouldn't have done. Another problem that I'm having with is that you always try to insult other people's intelligence despite confusion and possible problems with WP:V, which you did now for the second time with me.--F-22 RaptörAces High♠ 04:04, 31 March 2010 (UTC)