User talk:TAS06
Speedy deletion of Simon Chorley Art & Antiques[edit]
{{hangon}}
A tag has been placed on Simon Chorley Art & Antiques, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 01:33, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Simon Chorley Art & Antiques, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
==Deletion review==
I have posted a question at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Simon_Chorley_Art_.26_Antiques which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it? Stifle (talk) 09:47, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- The question was "On the deletion review page, there is an instruction "Deletion Review is to be used where someone is unable to resolve the issue in discussion with the administrator (or other editor) in question. This should be attempted first – courteously invite the admin to take a second look". I haven't noticed this discussion taking place. Can the nominator please explain why (or point out where the discussion was, as I may have missed it)?" You seem to have answered someone else's question, but not this one. Stifle (talk) 12:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- That is still not what I asked. When you disagree with a deletion decision, it is both correct procedure and common courtesy to ask the administrator who deleted the page to reconsider or explain his decision before making a deletion review listing. You did not do that, and I would like to know why.
- Also, can you please fix your signature so that it does not make the rest of the page red, and place your replies/new messages at the bottom of my talk page like everyone else does? Stifle (talk) 12:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I trust you will find the red has been removed now, the request to reinstate for reworking has been placed on the page of the user who deleted the Simon Chorley Art & Antiques page and I thank you for repositioning my original reply to you. It was not sent to the person who deleted, because I simply thought that they would have perued a dialogue before deletion if they were interested. I therefore placed my thoughts on a page where I hoped other users would support my request. I have not as yet received a reply however from the original user who made the deletion. I trust the request to reinstate the page for me to rework and present to other users this time for approval before I move it to Simon Chorley Art & Antiques will be granted in due course. User:TAS06
- I trust you will find the red has been removed now, the request to reinstate for reworking has been placed on the page of the user who deleted the Simon Chorley Art & Antiques page and I thank you for repositioning my original reply to you. It was not sent to the person who deleted, because I simply thought that they would have perued a dialogue before deletion if they were interested. I therefore placed my thoughts on a page where I hoped other users would support my request. I have not as yet received a reply however from the original user who made the deletion. I trust the request to reinstate the page for me to rework and present to other users this time for approval before I move it to Simon Chorley Art & Antiques will be granted in due course. User:TAS06
- I would also like to add an ERROR message came up when I clicked originally on What to Do if Article has been deleted: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Simon+Chorley+Art+%26amp%3B+Antiques , as I just had it happen again on this link. That is why I suppose I was unable to follow the correct procedure. Regards, User:TAS06
Image permission problem with Image:SALEROOMSCAA.JPG[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:SALEROOMSCAA.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:53, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:NEWLOGOFORWIKI.jpg.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:NEWLOGOFORWIKI.jpg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:05, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Your article...[edit]
...has been restored and moved to your userspace. You can find it at User:TAS06/Simon Chorley Art & Antiques. Please confirm that it meets Wikipedia criteria before putting moving it into article space.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 10:21, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Many thanks. I will presume that I should make you, and the others involved in pointing out the weaknesses of the article, aware when I wish to put it up again. Thanks again. User:TAS06/Simon Chorley Art & Antiques.
- Could someone please go to the revised article : [[1]] and I trust it has been cleaned up sufficiently, giving useful information about the world of the Provincial Auctioneer, as opposed to the celebrity and the international, as already mentioned. Thank you User:TAS06/Simon Chorley Art & Antiques
- Many thanks for the work put in to help prepare the page recently. Can I now move it to a unique Simon Chorley Art & Antiques page? Or should I wait for it to be moved? User:TAS06
Notification of automated file description generation[edit]
Your upload of File:BBC locall radio Antiques Broadcaster.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
File:BBC locall radio Antiques Broadcaster.JPG missing description details[edit]
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)File:BKAUCTION.JPG listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BKAUCTION.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
