User talk:Syriac563

November 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Arameans, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. global edits to spelling are not valid. You broke at least one image link, falsified a ref title, and changed quotes which need to remain as quotes. David Biddulph (talk) 13:16, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it inappropriate? Could you tell me more? Syriac563 (talk) 13:33, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You broke at least one image link, falsified a ref title, and changed quotes which need to remain as quotes. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The term Arameans is written wrong and different several times in the page. I literally corrected it. Is it allowed to correct it or not? Syriac563 (talk) 16:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The title of the article is Arameans, not Aramaeans. Both spellings are used in the sources. You will see discussion in the requested moves on the article talk page. There are obviously political arguments being conducted on the article's talk page. The place to resolve them is on that talk page, or at WP:dispute resolution if necessary. I have no interest in those political arguments. However, to be clear, a link to an image must use the spelling used in the link title, not the spelling which you might prefer. The title field in a reference citation must use the spelling used in the title of the reference itself, not the spelling which you might prefer. Any quote used must use the spelling used in the quote itself, not the spelling which you might prefer. - David Biddulph (talk) 16:36, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not about which spelling is used in the sources my friend. Use one spelling and stop confusing people with several different ways of writing one word. It is Aramean, then write it as Aramean everywhere in the text on the page. It has nothing to do with politics or whatever. On every page words are written in one way beside on the Aramean page, tell me more? Syriac563 (talk) 14:05, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I literally corrected the term of Arameans because it is written wrong and different on the page several times. Syriac563 (talk) 13:33, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arameans. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arameans speak/spoke Aramaic. Why does the page say that Arameans are 'Semitic speaking'. The page is written from an Assyrian nationalist POV. Syriac563 (talk) 12:11, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to demonstrate that in the talk page of the article with reliable sources backing you up. --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:36, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one is replying in the talk page. The Aramean page is totally written from an Assyrian nationalist POV. Syriac563 (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to be rude, but that may be because because you are ranting in the talk page. --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page is totally manipulated and hijacked by Assyrian nationalists for a long time. What can we do against it? There is so much proof that these people ain't Assyrians but Arameans/Syriacs. The 'Assyrian' name and identity is a made up identity that dates back to the 19th and 20th century. A lot of scholars argued that they are not Assyrians but Syriacs/Arameans. Syriac563 (talk) 16:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then prove it with sources from those scholars and stop constantly blaming it on the "Assyrian nationalists". Its hard to take you seriously when you keep talking about other people. Also, do mind that the article is pretty well sourced. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The next time you alter sourced information [1] you will be reported. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Arameans. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:16, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]