User talk:Synchrophoto

Speedy deletion nomination of Fauna (database)

Hello Synchrophoto,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fauna (database) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 00:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

I get that, but I was trying to make a page about the database, but remove all the marketing stuff about it from their web site and model it more off the MongoDB web site. I was afraid you all would think it was promotional, but wasn't sure how else to word it. Synchrophoto (talk) 01:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Fauna (database) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Fauna (database). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justiyaya 10:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Synchrophoto, I don't see how the subject passes the notability guidelines based off the sources that are already in the article. Please add some more in and submit it through the blue button on the top of the page. There still exist some tonal issues to the article (promotional) but without the subject meeting the notability guidelines the article might not get published. Writing an article is quite hard, why not get a bit more familiar with other areas of the encyclopedia? Justiyaya 10:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)