User talk:Supreme euphanasia

Welcome![edit]

Hello Supreme euphanasia! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Netsnipe ► 13:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Citing sources • Footnotes Image use policy • Copyrights • Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry What Wikipedia is not • Deletion policy

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The "perfect" article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Signing[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- Netsnipe ► 17:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey i thought i added them? cause i did it? didnt i? Supreme euphanasia 17:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Whoops! Sorry about this notice. I must have subliminally ignored the fact that you did sign your post because you didn't include a "--" like most people do! -- Netsnipe ► 17:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

haha yeah man its all good -- Supreme euphanasia 17:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually, that's quite strange. Are you using the default signature? Because I'm pretty sure the default one is supposed to turn your username as a link. -- Netsnipe ► 17:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

is it a link now? :) -- Supreme euphanasia 17:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All fine now. It wasn't the lack of -- that triggered the my {{tilde}} reflex but the lack of a link! -- Netsnipe ► 17:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tupac's real name[edit]

No, its Lesane Parish Crooks. Look at these sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] —Ocatecir ^Talk 06:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not shout. Please remain civil. —Ocatecir ^Talk 06:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to your comments on User talk:Ocatecir: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —Ocatecir ^Talk 07:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment in question can be seen here. —Ocatecir ^Talk 07:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This was not a personal attack, its due to ur ignornace as u have no rebutale sources to claim the changes u have made in the tupac shakur article and u have not discussed it in the birth report section -- Supreme euphanasia 07:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue your incivil behavior, I will have no choice but to block you. Please stick to commenting on the content of the article, and not its contributors. Thank you. -Mysekurity 22:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

We have gone over this many times. Until there is proof, it needs to be left at the compromise. I feel this is a good solution, and Flex, who oversaw the RfC had no problem with it. -Mysekurity 22:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Userboxes[edit]

hey man can u help me out on my user page i have 5 boxes how do i make them straight and close together? -- Supreme euphanasia 08:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Userboxes#Grouping userboxes -- Netsnipe ► 09:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tupac Shakur discography

I have blocked both License2Kill and MJukmix for edit warring without discussing the changes on the talk pages. You are also involved in this edit war, but I did not give you advance warning. Consider this your warning. If you revert the discography page in the 24 hours the other two are blocked, I will block you as well. Please refrain from changing the statistic until L2K and MJu are back, at which time I fully expect you all to discuss the facts on the talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Mysekurity 02:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

ok but i dont think l2k should have been blocked as he was doing the right thing. , 22 March -- Supreme euphanasia 03:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be that as it may, I have warned him several times about discussing it on the talk page. The same holds true for you. I will not warn you again. Use the talk page. -Mysekurity 03:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate you making helpful changes such as this. Hopefully when the blocks on the other two users expire (in about 2 to 3 hours), we can resolve this. Conversely, I would prefer you discussed changes such as this on the talk page. The content change in itself is not an issue, but as you are probably well aware, there is a bit of disagreement over the wording of the link. This sort of thing is minor, but seems to be a point of contention, and should therefore be discussed before reverting again. Happy editing, Mysekurity 23:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Sure, but there are tracks from when he was alive, as well as released tracks on there too... Is it for unreleased tracks? For posthumously released tracks? What is the purpose of the article? -Mysekurity 22:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

That sounds good. Would it possibly be an add-on to the discography? -Mysekurity 23:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Can you please provide links as to what this user (who I can't determine without at least a link to their userpage) did wrong? I can't take any action without them first being warned, and it's probably best for you to say something first. -Mysekurity 16:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Exactly how did my edits to the Tupac Shakur discography constitute vandalism? The album, Thug Life: Volume 1 is an album that was recorded by a rap group that Shakur started. If anything, the album was a collaboration between himself and others, hence not an album that can be entirely contributed to him. Even in the RIAA database, the album isn't listed under any certifications for Tupac Shakur, but for Thug Life instead.Odin's Beard (talk) 22:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Crstyle the Great. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Baba's camel (talk) 23:17, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Crstyle the Great constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Jimmy Lavoie × Vive le Québec! ^talk 23:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at Crstyle the Great[edit]

Please watch your tone and language when you are making edits to this article or related articles. The Crstyle the Great article will probably get deleted anyway if you let the discussion run its course. Calling people "smart ass" and threatening to "break this cunts legs" isn't going to make the process go any faster. Don't turn people against you if you have the ability to contribute positively to Tupac-related articles. ... discospinster _talk 01:21, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion[edit]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery