User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2011/August
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Another tendentious step by Chesdovi
Please comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palestinian rabbis, posted also on the Judaism Project page. Debresser (talk) 17:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Enough
I have been watching AGK's talk page for the last three months, and your continuous postings to his talk page are getting tiresome. He has explained his reasons for the topic ban numerous times, both at Arbitration Enforcement as well as your talk page and on his talk page, and continuously posting to his talk page about it is not the appropriate avenue to appeal. If you wish to appeal your six month topic ban, you may do so by appealing to the Arbitration Committee at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment or by emailing arbcom-l
lists.wikimedia.org. Further posts to AGK's talk page may lead to an interaction ban. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 10:35, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Doug.(talk • contribs) 19:52, 21 August 2011 (UTC)- If you wished to be unblocked I expect that you will agree to either drop this issue OR take it to WP:ARBCOM; there is no point to continuing to harass AGK after they have explained the situation and your comments to User:Steven Zhang telling him that this was none of his business shows a complete lack of understanding of the principles of Wikipedia.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 19:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- I haven't harassed anyone. AGK told me that we were going to have the discussion, I gave him reply that he hasn't answered to, he hasn't given any explanation for why he hasn't replied to me. Is this appropriate for an admin who hands out a half a year topic ban to someone? This is only further evidence that he is an illegitimate admin who cant even explain his own bogus topic ban he hands out. He is abusing his admin privileges and you are letting him get away with it. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 12:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but your last sentence is precisely why I have latterly stopped engaging with you at all. While you have the right to challenge me about your ban, you may not behave in a way that is so devoid of professionalism as to corroborate the ban. AGK [•] 21:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- It was repeatedly pointed out to you that you left the main part of my reply on your talkpage, which shows that you had no problem with it. You choose not to reply. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 01:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but your last sentence is precisely why I have latterly stopped engaging with you at all. While you have the right to challenge me about your ban, you may not behave in a way that is so devoid of professionalism as to corroborate the ban. AGK [•] 21:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)