User talk:Strovolos01

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Andreas2009 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:07, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nicosia. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 13:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Nicosia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 13:15, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andreas2009 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 13:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account for a week for disruption; in particular, for engaging in revert warring on the article Nicosia by removing images from it for the sole reason of your disapproval of Muslim influence on Cyprus and threatening other users with blocking. Wikipedia is not a battleground. (If it's confirmed that your account is a sockpuppet of a blocked user, it can be blocked indefinitely.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is necessary to unblock me now!!! I am not that user and you have no excuse from blocking me in that cruel way . I have done excessive work to Wikipedia and you show no respect for that. What do you mean muslim influence in Cyprus? Cyprus is an absolutely neutral country with no official religion. Placing 4 pictures of Mosques in Nicosia article makes the article look like a Turkish city. You are unexcused and I would appreciate if you unblocked me and say sorry

What's inappropriate about the inclusion of pictures of mosques in the article about the city of Nicosia, if there are indeed mosques in the city? Also, please note that Nicosia is located on the border between Northern and Southern Cyprus - about 300.000 people in the south, 80.000 in the north - and the article covers both parts. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who the hell is "we"? Do not use threats like that. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 00:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]