User talk:Strawberryfields100

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Genesis by the Gods - cover.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Genesis - The Gods.jpg. The copy called Image:Genesis - The Gods.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 16:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mick Taylor.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mick Taylor.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bruce Gary.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bruce Gary.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Genesis by the Gods - cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Genesis by the Gods - cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking maintenance tags[edit]

Do not remove [citation nedded] tags from article until you address the reason for their placement. These tags are placed for a reason. If you continue with this disruptive behaviour you will be reported to an administrator and blocked from editing Wikipedia. 142.167.66.181 (talk) 12:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. You do not need an account to be a valid contributor. I have over 30000 edits without an account and have no intention of getting one. IF you have anti-anon prejudice then you have chosen the wrong hobby. An administrator has been contacted about your ownership issues. 142.167.66.181 (talk) 14:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your understanding of WIkipedia will be greatly improved if you read WP:EDIT, WP:MOS, WP:CITE, WP:V, WP:ATT, WP:AWW and especially WP:RS and WP:NPOV. You seem to have a struggle with those key policies. It is an encyclopedia not a fansite. Please remember that when editing. 142.167.66.181 (talk) 14:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again... read WP:RS and WP:V. You cannot just add some little piece of bracketed text that refers to a book or an interview. That's a WP:ATT vio and a WP:V vio. Citations needs to be verifiable. An inline link must be added to allow all readers to be able to quickly go to the given source and verify that what they are reading is correct. I do not doubt you have some keen interst in the subject. Encyclopedia articles are not books. They are a cold, dry series of facts about the subject in the article title. Superfluous production credits have nothing to do with Mick Taylor and are not required in his article. The page is to be clear of all adjectives and opinions... assumptions and conjectures... no original research. You can use the talk page to add lnks to websites and books concerning specific bits of text. After they have been verfied then they can be included. If you have vested interest in an external source that you yourself have contributed to. That source will have to come under even more scrutiny as it becomes a WP:COI issue which is very serious. 142.167.66.181 (talk) 14:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously there is no point in adding "citation needed" tags to an article if you do not give anyone the chance to relocate the references by doing reversions every 10 minutes, in the process even removing several citations/references that were part of the article.

A response to these comments from user 142.167.66.181 can be found on the talk page of this user: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:142.167.66.181.

Listed there is also another critical remark addressed to user 142.167.66.181 about removing content, from the article regarding Gibson Guitar Corporation. Evidently User 142.167.66.181 (and/or his suspected sock puppet) have been busy "cleaning up" or "streamlining" that article too. Strawberryfields100 (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]