User talk:Stickstickley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ok, I understand, chair fighting was a bad article. ( Stickstickley (talk) 01:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC) )[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. To find out more about how to make useful contributions, take a look at the welcome page. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on notability for an explanation of what that means. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources. Articles that don't meet these requirements are deleted. Follow the links below to learn more:

  1. To find out more about creating articles, read the introduction, tutorial, and guide to creating your first article.
  2. Do not write articles about yourself, your company, your band, or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
  3. Wikipedia is not an advertising service.
  4. For experiments, please use the sandbox. JohnCD (talk) 20:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on KICK (soda), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 20:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Please do not use talk pages such as Image talk:Virgin Killer.jpg‎ for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. Kesh (talk) 17:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I call child porn when I see it, pervert. ( Stickstickley (talk) 01:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC) )[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Red hair for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. Kesh (talk) 17:52, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for proving my point, you've obviously never had sex with a redhead :D ( Stickstickley (talk) 19:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC) )[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Image talk:Virgin Killer.jpg for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked. NrDg 20:01, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Sandahl (♀) 02:29, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 week, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ Amory (utc) 04:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Stickstickley. Woogee (talk) 04:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Jake Shields, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —C.Fred (talk) 23:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- CRY ME A RIIIIVVVVERRRRRR (Stickstickley (talk) 23:24, 20 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Stickstickley (talkcontribs)

  • And I've seen the message you left me on my talk page and deleted it. There's no need to leave it again. —C.Fred (talk) 23:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 23:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stickstickley (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Cfred is banning me because of posts I reverted on his discussion page. Claims it is for vandalism, but I stopped vandalizing after first warning, he banned me immediately after a 3rr warning which he decided to delete. He is only mad because I reverted an edit that showed him attacking another user. The punishment does not fit the crime, I stopped vandalizing after warned.

Decline reason:

Block is justified based on edit history. Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 00:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Because of your abuse of the unblock template and your use of alternate accounts to edit this page, I have extended your block to indefinite and revoked your ability to edit this talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 14:27, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]