User talk:Status/2013/01

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Happy new year![edit]

Happy new year!
May 2013 bring lots of happiness and perhaps a change for the better here on Wikipedia.
Emphasis on change. I know you would love one! —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 03:09, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Penguin! I hope the very best for you too!  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 07:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year 2013[edit]

Happy New Year 2013
I wish you a Happy New Year for 2013 :-) AARON• TALK 09:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year[edit]

Happy New Year!!
Happy New Year! I hope you have an amazing productive year, filled with happiness. Much Love, Arre 12:07, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2013 WikiCup[edit]

Hello, Status, and welcome to the 2013 WikiCup! Your submissions' page is here. The first round will last until the end of February, at which point the top 64 scorers will advance to the second round. We will be in touch at the end of every month, and signups are going to remain open until the end of January; if you know of anyone else who may like to take part, please let them know! A few reminders:

  • The rules can be found here. There have been a few changes from last year, which are listed on that page.
  • Anything you submit must have been nominated and promoted in 2013, and you need to have completed significant work upon it in 2013. (The articles you review at good article reviews does not need to have been nominated in 2013, but you do need to have started and completed the review in 2013.) We will be checking.
  • If you feel that another competitor is breaking the rules or abusing the competition in some way, please let a judge know. Please do not remove entries from the submissions' pages of others yourself.
  • Don't worry about calculating precisely how many points everything is worth. The bot will do that. The bot may occasionally get something wrong- let a judge know, or post on the WikiCup talk page if that happens.
  • Please try to be prompt in updating submissions' pages so that they can be double-checked.

Overall, however, don't worry, and have fun. It doesn't matter if you make the odd mistake; these things happen. Questions can be asked on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 13:00, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfAs[edit]

Hi Sandy, I noticed you've struck the votes of User:MathewTownsend, while I understand why you're doing it, I don't think it's the appropriate thing to do, the RfAs have already been closed and reflect the state of the RfA back whenever the 'crat closed; as the closing 'crat likely took into consideration that vote, I think striking it is a bit misleading :) Snowolf How can I help? 00:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, what's the usual in similar cases? Maybe indicate it's a sock without striking? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:56, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That matters in a closed RFA because...?  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 01:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Status, I don't who the heck you are or why you're popping up in these conversations, but you smell like a stinky sock to me, so bug off. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:44, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you put me in the washer and find out then? If you actually think just because someone thinks that it's stupid to go and strike out every comment from a sock that I must be one of them...  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 01:54, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what's the normal practice I'm afraid :D Snowolf How can I help? 01:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing. Unless you think, for some reason, the RFA only went through because of said sock.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 02:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your behaviour on talk pages, again[edit]

I've removed the section that you copied from User:SandyGeorgia's talk page. Your talk page is not a webhost for you to post any old material you wish, especially when done solely to harass another editor. I assume you were irritated by her removal of your comments (as she is perfectly entitled to do), which in themselves were unhelpful and completely unnecessary, from a thread on her talk page, and so re-posted them here to set the record straight. That is not ok.

This is the second time in a few days I've had to tidy up dirty tricks you've played on talk pages. Three strikes and you will be blocked. Like I said last time, it's time to head back to the article namespace. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 03:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can post any such discussion if I feel so damn well fit on my talk page. I didn't revert her deleting my comments, I moved them to mine, as I would like to have it as an archive. "Dirty tricks"? I advise you to move along.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I left a simple comment on her talk, in which she in tern accused me of being a sock of a user she hasn't stopped bitching about for days. If moving that discussion to my own talk is against some guideline, please, feel free to block me. Try me.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I advise you to review WP:TALKNO and WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK and kindly revert yourself.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think the most relevant guideline is WP:OWNTALK which describes how all user talk discussion should be aimed at improving the encyclopaedia. Surely even you would agree to that. Look, I didn't come here to give you some sort of silly dressing down or tap on the wrist. I simply came to tell you to stop, and if in warning you that I would block you if you continued I came across as authoritarian then I apologise (and you may find the discussion on my talk page started by another editor about this relevant). However my original statement still stands. I simply think it's best for you to let this go - porting a discussion onto your talk page just to wind someone else up, however tangentially, just isn't constructive. If you don't think what I just said is reasonable, then I'll get someone else to look at the situation. Alternatively we can all shake hands and move on, it's up to you. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 03:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And? If I want to archive a discussion in which a user was being extremely rude to me for my archives, I am entitled to do that. Yes, I saw your response on your talk page, and it seems like you believe that I can't simply comment on someone else's talk page. I am not the one who brought on the attack. You are saying two completely different things. You threaten with a block, but also advising me to let a discussion go (which I already did, the two times you actually gave me a "warning".) Oh, and how am I being childish? Simply responding to people is childish now? This seems like a status issue to me (no pun intended). Again, if you don't revert yourself, I will.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course I think you're well within your right to respond to comments aimed at you, but after you responded she then removed without commenting further. I have to be completely honest - I do think that you making a copy of the already-concluded discussion here was childish, as it serves no purpose other than to score points. Look, if you really wanted an archive of the little exchange, then you could have just put it in your archive, instead of posting it here where you knew she was likely to read it. I've been as reasonable as I can be here - I've apologised for the tone of my initial post here, and tried to have a good-mannered discussion with you subsequent to that. However, the substance of my initial concern remains, and I won't be reverting. I think I have said all I have to say. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 03:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I've just read your comment on my talk page, and how about this - forget my initial comment, I am asking you, please, don't make all this horrible mess any worse by winding people up on talk pages. You're bigger than that, you have more to offer this project than that and it will help everyone if you simply let it go (the same could be said for everyone else). I had no intention to "single you out" and apologise if it felt that way. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 03:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) For the record, I don't display them publicly, but I have archives of every discussion that ever occurred on my talk page, as well as several other notable discussions I copied to my talk. I archive discussions at a quick rate, so it would have been archived tomorrow, anyway. I accept your apology, and have responded on your talk page. I will be archiving my talk page now.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finally[edit]

Thanks for your understanding. For the record, I think what you've done there putting it in that archive page, is fine. See you around Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 04:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Yes, I can assure you I wasn't trying to start anything more by adding it to my talk. As I said, I archive everything usually at once after a few days. See ya!  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 04:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nice to see this have been solved. — ΛΧΣ21 04:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 December 2012[edit]

Disney/Marvel[edit]

Please, read about Marvel/Disney Studios relationship as you are incorrectly adding Marvel Studios as a Disney Studios subsidary. Spshu (talk) 19:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Their website disagrees with that claim.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 19:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you followed the wikilink, it would show its full quote from that page, so no, you have just failed to read the page. --Spshu (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you![edit]

Nice change to When Can I See You Again?‎, incorporating the genre into the body. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*nom nom* Thank you! Happy new year!  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 20:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year[edit]

File:Happy New Year 2013.jpg Have an enjoyable New Year!
Hello Status: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, ~ Jedi94 (talk) 21:17, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2013}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
Thank you Jedi! Same to you!  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 02:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Avril Lavigne discography[edit]

My bad. Someone left a comment on my talk page regarding the Disco. so I went to look at it and saw a ton of IP edits (including countries → type of certification, which I did not know was the correct style until now) and a reference nightmare followed by reverts by a couple different editors within the past 24 hours, I figured it was all vandalism and reverted it. I guess there's much more value in those edits than originally thought! ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 01:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright. It happens.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 02:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:...Baby One More Time[edit]

Ping! You have a reply. --George Ho (talk) 03:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another reply. --George Ho (talk) 04:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (January 2013)[edit]

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume IV, No. 1 – January 2013

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue


This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WikiCup[edit]

Sorry about that, you should be added. I've given you the flag of Prince Edward Island for now, but I can change it. Your submissions' page is here. J Milburn (talk) 22:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you!  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 22:04, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid not. Nominations have to be made in 2013, and significant work needs to be done in 2013. J Milburn (talk) 22:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks for letting me know.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discography charts[edit]

Zach, is it necessary that we use the same charts on both album and single sections in a discography? It's the first time I'm hearing this and Till told me to ask you. 五代 (talk) 11:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dayzee Leigh[edit]

Hey, sorry I forgot Lol! D: Would u still be whiling to do it again? Arre 23:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I would. I've got some free time now, just saying.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 23:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I'll make a few adjustments and then re nominate it. Also, why are you insistent on this move? It's unnecessarily. Just makes the title longer and annoying. Arre 23:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I understand it's longer, but the article is about characters that first appeared in 2013, not every character that was on the show in 2013. The title is misleading.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 23:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I know what you mean, but imo it's unnecessary and nobody in the hundreds of year by soap character articles have used it. I'll ask around for other opinions. Also did you here a rumor that Jen's new album will be titled Infinite..?Arre 23:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you point me towards any of such articles that are GA? No, I didn't hear that!  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 23:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think anyone has ever nominated them for "GA", because they classify them as lists. If they were articles, majority of them would be GA. They are just listed as "List-Class". Still sort of unsure why you don't think they are lists. 23:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
They aren't lists. A list involves a table. They are all prose, they would be nominated for GA.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 23:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I believe they are lists because they are a chronological timeline, just of character profiles and are not in tables. But I get you and sorta agree. Arre 23:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It does indeed list the characters, but it would qualify for GA because it's all prose and no tables.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 23:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly all of those (other soaps) have tables for minor characters. I have added a few tables for Y&R character articles but have yet to add any tables for 2013. Arre 00:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Even if it has a little table in it, it's still not a list. Albums and songs have tables for release histories do they not?  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Meh never mind anyway a ha as I said I'm sorta of bored of soaps. I want to focus on Jenny-related stuff for a few weeks:) Arre 00:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Lopez[edit]

I already uploaded the image file of J.Lo on the People cover so I'm hoping to include the 'celebrity status' section in her main article within the next fews days. Any thoughts on this sandbox I've been working on? Too long? Should i include rough dates (Like In June 1942 she won this, In April 1974 she was, that sort of thing?) for the awards/recognition info. I hope you're still online. Arre 00:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looks much better than it was before. I don't think so, it looks fine to me! I say it's time to be added back into the article.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There, just added it :) What'you think? Arre 00:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's great. 152kb... our aim is for 150, and I'm sure we will be able to get there. Once I finish cleaning up a few of the life and career sections. Choreography and music videos needs some work, do you wanna work on that? Other than that and a few life and career sections, the article is practically done.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do you want me to expand or reduce choreography/music videos, or just fix it up? Arre 00:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think it covers her most important videos, it just needs some copyediting and reorganizing. Also need to choose a music video to show as an image.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:33, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Since Bennifer was still going on in 2003 (and she didn't do that much in 2003), I've merged it in with 2001/02. Now, 2004/06 does not have that much information. It needs one more paragraph, but I can't think of anything else that needs to be added. Do you know anything else she did in those years that could be added to the article?  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm sorry but I'm not too sure. I think it covers all the important stuff she did, sorry :\ Btw, for the music videos section should I include what year every video was in? Arre 01:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Damn! Well, "J.Lo, The Wedding Planner, This Is Me... Then and Bennifer (2001–03)" is the only section now that needs re-writing. Once that is done, I'll see if there is any more shuffling around of sections that I can do. Yeah, include the years.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 01:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm thinking of changing it to "Music videos and performance" and include info about her stage performing. What do u think? No use? Arre 01:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, now that she has toured, why the hell not?  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 01:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yup okay. I just hope it doesn't get too long :\ Arre 01:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you use a different pic for the 2011-12 section? Its a good image but its already being used on her Discography page.. Meh. Btw, what do u think of Music videos and performance? Is it too long?Arre 01:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How to nominate a DYK?[edit]

Hello, I was wondering how can I nominate a DYK? I've seen that many articles have been nominated, as you did for Scream & Shout a few weeks ago, but I got really confused before creating a nomination for Something New (song). I've just promoted the article to GA yesterday and expanded it five days ago. - Saulo Talk to Me 23:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See this. If you have any questions about anything there that you aren't sure with, feel free to ask me.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 23:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great. Thank you. - Saulo Talk to Me 08:54, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Original dispute 2. Thank you. — ΛΧΣ21 23:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter (4th Quarter 2012)[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2012
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2012, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 03:01, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 07 January 2013[edit]

DYK for Homme by David Beckham[edit]

Nyttend (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Sanjuro[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sanjuro. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Opportunity: Low to High Opportunity: High Opportunity: High Opportunity: High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Opportunity: High Just a Lil Bit   Opportunity: High Irfan Abidi
Opportunity: Medium Rehab (band)   Opportunity: Low Whitney Houston discography
Opportunity: Low Apagorevmeno (song)   Opportunity: Medium Loose: The Concert
Opportunity: High Santa Claus Lane (song)   Merge
Opportunity: High Fireman (song)   Opportunity: Medium Mike Watson
Opportunity: High Passport to Paris   Opportunity: High Solar observatory
Opportunity: High I'm So Fly   Opportunity: High Boolean algebra (structure)
Opportunity: High Luke Benward   Add sources
Opportunity: High Beautiful (10 Years song)   Opportunity: High I'm Lovin' It (song)
Opportunity: High Extraordinary (song)   Opportunity: High Hilary Duff concert tours
Opportunity: High Watching Airplanes   Opportunity: High 2012 in British music
Opportunity: High Mixin to Thrill   Wikify
Opportunity: High Ching Ching   Opportunity: High Eurovox
Opportunity: Low Robert Thomson (cyclist)   Opportunity: Medium Stewart MacFarlane
Opportunity: High Get on the Bus (song)   Opportunity: High Mathew Waters
Opportunity: High Jhoan Camitz   Expand
Opportunity: High Blackground Records   Opportunity: Low James McCartney
Opportunity: High Shorty Wanna Ride   Opportunity: High In Search of Santa
Opportunity: High Hilary Duff: This Is Now   Opportunity: High The Kane Chronicles

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cruel Summer[edit]

I reverted your recent move of Cruel Summer (GOOD Music album), as it was a point briefly brought up in a past consensus/page move, along with whether it is a compilation or studio album. I explained it more at the talk page and think more comments/a more definitive consensus would be useful. Dan56 (talk) 02:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:...Baby One More Time#Requested move[edit]

You have replies. --George Ho (talk) 06:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 January 2013[edit]

Requested changes have been made at Talk:Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit/GA1[edit]

Just letting you know. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:55, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...and again. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We Loved[edit]

Did you here about this new Jennifer Lopez song?:) Arre 17:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timing of Talk:Scarygirl/GA1[edit]

Hi there. I just wanted to let you know that my schedule for the next three days is getting kind of packed, so while I'd love to get the GAN over with, I might not be able to make any/many edits until Tuesday. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:34, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me. I have a few school projects to do this weekend and on Monday I'll have school and work. Tuesday fits perfectly with my schedule.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 07:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well I found some time in between previously scheduled items. Actually I had a lot of time, since I over-budgeted for one of the items rather dramatically. Whenever you've got the time. I'm in no rush. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:13, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfA: Lord Roem[edit]

I noticed you'd !voted. As it's likely to be removed (because the candidate hasn't yet accepted the nomination), you may wish to revert it yourself ... You can easily reinstate it, once the RFA is transcluded ;)  Roger Davies talk 16:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is now live. Please uncomment your support whenever you feel ready to do so. NW (Talk) 20:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"My Hands"[edit]

Did you create a review page which was deleted afterwards??  — AARON • TALK 20:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I did.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 22:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why was it deleted?  — AARON • TALK 22:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I requested it; changed my mind. (I was supposed to be doing school work... but I can't stop procreating... GRR!)  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 22:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh okay. Lol.  — AARON • TALK 22:37, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Spot[edit]

I began doing this article. Can you help out a bit? Arre 22:18, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw! It's looking good so far! I'm not really sure what else could be added. It looks pretty full for an upcoming single ATM. But whatever you need to me to do.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 22:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you find any reliable sources about them filming the video. I thought that would be the easiest part but I haven't found a single source yet :\ Arre 23:54, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There's one on Jennifer Lopez videography. That's all I could find.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 23:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Suit & Tie[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for List of Billboard Social 50 number-one acts[edit]

KTC (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Kyuss[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kyuss. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal[edit]

The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
Belated congratulations on reaching the milestone of twenty-five of your articles featured in the Did you know... column of the Main Page! Your efforts are on the record and are greatly appreciated. Moonraker (talk) 23:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so very much! I am honored!  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:55, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1979 Venezuelan motorcycle Grand Prix[edit]

The user removed well sourced classifications past tenth place. You also reverted my corrections, such as describing Walter Villa as Venezuelan when he is Italian. Stating the positions do not require sourcing in the lead as they are clearly sourced later on. By reverting my reversion, the article is demonstrably less accurate. If you want to change the infobox, take it to the WikiProject and get consensus to do it. If you want to change the way the race articles are presented, take it to the WikiProject too because we have lots of motorcycle Grand Prix articles that would have to be edited if that was the case. I reverted Hahc21's edit as it added nothing to the article, barring a couple of pictures and a badly written lead. Readro (talk) 10:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's what the talk page is for, you don't go and revert every single edit somebody made to the article. Especially when they are a long-time contributor, that is just plain disrespectful. I'm not the one who edited the article, you don't argue you with, you argue with them.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 13:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re[edit]

I have not been abusing you, and you have been swearing at me which I have already reported you on AIV and you shall be receiving a warning soon. You just got annoyed that I found out about the single before you and you didn't like me editing the discography. Now I've prov=ved to you it is a single, you decided to merge the "featured artists" and normal singles together to so you get full credit. This shows how immature and pathetic you are. One of the worst contributors on wikipedia. Krusty111 (talk · contribs) 00:19, 23 January 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Unapologetic[edit]

Hi Status,

I've undone your move of this page to Unapologetic (album). More than 90% of the incoming links to Unapologetic refer to the album, so I think it's safe to say that it is the primary topic. Or, at least it gives enough reasonable doubt that a requested move discussion would be best here. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 January 2013[edit]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for ignoring my request to stop moving my "Yes" reply around. Sca (talk) 13:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank Kww (talk · contribs), not me.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 15:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Triple Crown[edit]

It is my pleasure to award Status with this Imperial Napoleonic triple crown for all his work on Good and Featured content here on wikipedia. All hail the emperor!--Cheers, — ΛΧΣ21 19:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That you so very much Hahc!  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 20:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HELP me[edit]

I've tried to edit my wiki talk / user page twice but its only removing everything :\\\\ Arre 07:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WTF. That's really weird. I thought you were rage quitting or something.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 07:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ikr. Ugh It's really annoying. Arre 07:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

CloversMallRat keeps changing the LeAnn Rimes discography page and stating that "What Have I Done" is not a single and on LeAnn's official site it clearly states it is a single and "Borrowed" is the second especially here: http://leannrimesworld.com/news/117451 where in the first line it reads: "The second single off of LeAnn's upcoming album, 'Spitfire', is available now! Make sure you grab a copy today!" 184.58.0.27 (talk) 15:10, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GWR issue[edit]

Hi. Can you comment quickly at Talk:The Fragile (Nine Inch Nails album)#Genres? An editor is trying to use consensus as a loophole to get around a genre that can actually be verified by a reputed source. He's going after my character now, so the discussion could use some objectivity right about now. Dan56 (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 01:19, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Opportunity: Low to High Opportunity: High Opportunity: High Opportunity: High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Opportunity: High Chris Cashman   Opportunity: High Fernando Garibay
Opportunity: High Never Will Be Mine   Opportunity: Low Whitney Houston discography
Opportunity: High Sara Ramirez (EP)   Opportunity: Low Need You Now (song)
Opportunity: High Just a Lil Bit   Merge
Opportunity: High Emma de Caunes   Opportunity: Medium Zowie discography
Opportunity: High Mežaparks   Opportunity: High Sheffield, Massachusetts
Opportunity: High Larry Rudolph   Opportunity: Medium Samarobriva
Opportunity: High Shorty Wanna Ride   Add sources
Opportunity: High A Mother's Gift   Opportunity: Low Forever (Chris Brown song)
Opportunity: High Campoformido   Opportunity: High Playlist: The Very Best of Britney Spears
Opportunity: High I'm on One   Opportunity: High Hot Boys
Opportunity: Low Uncharted (chart)   Wikify
Opportunity: High Filmweb   Opportunity: Low Reb'l Fleur
Opportunity: High Great Times (song)   Opportunity: Low Amy Winehouse discography
Opportunity: Low Sweet Nothing (song)   Opportunity: Low Wild Ones (album)
Opportunity: High Pat Cashman   Expand
Opportunity: High Palais Nikaia   Opportunity: Low Back to Black
Opportunity: Low Vika Jigulina   Opportunity: High Fashion of His Love
Opportunity: High Volví a Nacer   Opportunity: Medium Nicola Formichetti

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:15, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vamos a Celebrar[edit]

Hey, I just want to take the time and thank you for your work on "Vamos a Celebrar". Thanks :D Also, the live album. Thanks for that too, though, it wasn't shouting. The album's name is stylized with the last word capitalized. — DivaKnockouts (talk) 03:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem!  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:15, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:The Muppets[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Muppets. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Fiona Apple/archive1[edit]

Thanks for reviewing this list. I believe I have addressed your concerns. Please let me know otherwise. Thanks so much! --Another Believer (Talk) 04:33, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift discography[edit]

The Moment I Knew is a promo single as I showed the link for it also there is a news report on Taylor's site stating it has been released http://taylorswift.com/news/120541 and iTunes clearly states single but it has the album cover over a cover making it not an official single but a promo. You should look at things before you say no evidence. Thanks. 184.58.0.27 (talk) 05:24, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 January 2013[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Status/2013/01&oldid=1180481723"