User talk:Starace Aniello

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

welcome?[edit]

Hey how's it going. On wikipedia we can't allow personal or WP:OR original research to be cited at all, for obvious reasons. However this is exactly what you have injected into the Moseley's law article. Your heavy editting of that article is going to be reverted, until such time that your original research is peer reviewed in a reputable scientific journal.

To end, I tried helping you, in the possible chance you have publications to your name or are cited by a reputable science reporter. The only thing I found however, on looking up your name, was that you appeared on "Border nights", an italian youtube channel that peddles unconvincing conspiracy theories and UFO sightings to its audiences. While keeping an open mind, this association with crackpot ideas, does not add any credibility to your personal research or heavily editting wikipedia articles to push your own, non-peer reviewed physics ideas.

I wish you well in your peer-review submission...until then I hope you understand why we have to undue your changes to the article.

For more on our policies, on what meets basic acceptability,  see WP:RS.

If you mailed say, a science reporter for phys(dot)org or something like that, with your hypothesis and they published a magazine article on the subject, mentioning you. That would just barely meet our minimum entry requirements found on exploring the WP:RS page.

Without something like that, we can't include your personal blog. Best of luck again, though I hope you can understand if everyone editted wikipedia with their own personal blog supported theories, it would soon devolve to even lower levels of respectability, than it already is.

Again. Hope it works out for you! You may well have something there but wikipedia is not the avenue to go down, the peer-review process exists for a reason. Who knows maybe on discussing with the physicists on the topic, something else might fall out of the discussion, even more a refinement than what you suggest you have already? Boundarylayer (talk) 20:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]