User talk:Stansult

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Category:User uz-0[edit]

I have speedy deleted Category:User uz-0. Please do not recreate categories that were deleted via UCFD debates. If you think the category should be undeleted, you can propose that at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Thanks, VegaDark (talk) 04:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain me the form that I should use to write there? I'm not very experienced in such things. Thanx. Stansult 12:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The userbox is fine, keeping that on your page is no problem. The only thing that has been removed is the category. User categories are meant for seeking people in such a group out- But there will be no reason to ever go looking for people who don't speak a language. This is why all the 0-level categories were deleted. Once again, the userbox is fine and you can keep it on your page to let others know you don't speak it. VegaDark (talk) 00:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanx Stansult 05:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

I had no intention to delete dates, it was an edit error. Thank you for understanding Moldopodo (talk) 12:09, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Moldopodo[reply]

OK, no problem. Stansult (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Windows XP logo small.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by c:File:Unofficial Windows logo variant - 2002–2012 (Multicolored).svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]