User talk:SpigotMap/Archive 6

List of characters in Tron

This article has had content merged and so cannot be deleted per The GFDL. If you would like to discuss further merging and redirecting, please use the article's talk page to do so. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Pay no attention to A Nobody's bluster. It was he who created the article by copy/pasting, without attribution or linking to the original article histories, the contents of the articles that were the subjects of these deletion discussions; so it's actually he who has clearly violated the licensing terms of the GFDL. Of course, now that he's removed your prod, you'll have to take the matter to AfD if you still want the article deleted (and if you think there's a chance that the consensus of the previous discussions will now be rejected in favor of deleting the article and the redirects). Deor (talk) 18:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Ignore Deor as that account does not seem to have any real knowledge of GFDL and the like, but rather just has it out for me and so tends to make up whatever so as to antagonize me. Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 21:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps if you didn't constantly do shifty things, A Nobody, people wouldn't feel the need to criticize your actions. Your merges seldom have a content or navigational purposes; your goal is simply to to create attribution dependencies because you want to confound our deletion processes. This is gaming the system and is borderline disruptive. But you know this, because you've been doing it off and on for quite some time and it was one of the many things brought up at the RFC that you want to sweep under the carpet. Reyk _YO! 09:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

You can similarly safely and wisely ignore partisan and disruptive accounts that are merely trying to "fly the Deletionist flag over at AfD" rather than make open-minded and constructive contributions to the project. For such accounts, my current approach is to once I see that they posted something, to read no further so as not to even give them the satisfaction that I read a word of what they typed as we know whatever it is will be some distortion or unconstructive bias not worth even reading a word of. Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 16:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

PlaneShift editing

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on PlaneShift (video game). If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --92.103.172.106 (talk) 16:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on PlaneShift (video game). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --92.103.172.106 (talk) 16:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:SpigotMap may be offensive or unwelcome. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. --92.103.172.106 (talk) 16:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Wow. I got warned for editing my own user page... SpigotMap 17:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Wow indeed! What a constructive approach to editing. I have responded to your request for help on my talk page. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:33, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

This one was a wrong cut and paste, you can ignore the last warning and delete it. --92.103.172.106 (talk) 11:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Your editing of the PlaneShift pages is wrong, picky and unuseful. If you want to contribute to that page, actually ADD good information, instead of consistently REMOVING what others are adding. --92.103.172.106 (talk) 13:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

I totally agree, there is no value in those changes. Stop doing dumb reverts of the work of others. --79.30.201.16 (talk) 23:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

You are warned again to stop vandalizing the PlaneShift (video game) wiki page. That page is not yours and useful edits of people is a bad act and is not helping wikipedia. I will take this to wikipedia editors or whoever is needed to ban your user if you insist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Planeshift rpg (talk • contribs) 12:53, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I decided to keep track here the number of times User:SpigotMap vandalized the PlaneShift page. At the moment I count 14 times in 4 days. I think there are all the basis for a ban of this user. I will find out how to do this. Please if you are another user and read this message, beware of SpigotMap and his edits. --Planeshift rpg (talk) 22:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Just for your reference, he did it 2 more times today. --Xyz231 (talk) 22:26, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Please read WP:VAN before reverting anything else in the planeshift article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.32.39.251 (talk) 18:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: User_talk:CourtneyXY

Person in question is an admin on "hurrchan", helped place the unsourced advertisement on imageboard for the site in the first place, undid a prior revert of someone who corrected the article. I may have been a little hasty in placing the final warning, I assumed either CourtneyXY or Turbocat404 would revert me when I corrected the article the last time, so I (unsuccessfully) tried to give a strong warning to both to discourage it. Change it to a lesser warning if you like. Also don't mean to be rude but I don't see your name on the admin's list, who are you? Chewwy225 (talk) 02:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Original addition here, revert here. Chewwy225 (talk) 01:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Old Friends

By the way some PlaneShift players just notified me that SpigotMap is an old banned player from PlaneShift .... oooohhh, what a surprise!!! So all his edits were really to help the page!!! Oh really!! Get away from us, and stop being a vandal. Just connected to planeshift irc as "Linksunius (~Linksuniu@wikipedia/SpigotMap)" --Planeshift rpg (talk) 22:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

his edits were vandalism however this is not necessary information please stay on topic --76.90.200.238 (talk) 06:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

PlaneShift editing

I think you should stay away from editing the PlaneShift (video game) because your point of view is not neutral and infringes the Wikipedia:NPOV, plus you have surely a Wikipedia:COI on it --Xyz231 (talk) 22:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

TOMA4ATO_MONSTAH thinks so too! TOMA4ATO MONSTAH (talk) 00:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Spam

Can you please stop spamming my page with your wrong warning? I don't care of what you think, so please avoid posting your nonsense to my discussion page. --Xyz231 (talk) 02:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I asked you already, can you stop spamming my page with your non sense?? --Xyz231 (talk) 18:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism of PlaneShift page

Your massive revert of all the notable sources added by other editors is vandalism to me. Stop this now. Your user has been reported again to admins. --Xyz231 (talk) 18:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes, this was entirely unhelpful. I was about to again warn Xyz for mislabeling your edits as vandalism, but this time I have to agree with them. The removal of the AfD template alone is vandalism, let alone the rest of the edit. —DoRD (talk) 18:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Won't happen again. SpigotMap 19:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

User:No-Girl 223

You reverted edits of the above user. So you know, he/she is a sock. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lila Cheney 336 . Cheers, -- Flyguy649 ^talk 15:02, 4 April 2010 (UTC)