User talk:Sp651

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Imsogb for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imsogb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imsogb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Golgofrinchian (talk) 14:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Imsogb[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Imsogb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kudpung (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Imsogb. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kudpung (talk) 14:15, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some tools for you to use[edit]

Check out the "Article Wizard" link below:

Hello, Sp651, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Golgofrinchian (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Good Luck! Golgofrinchian (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imsogb[edit]

Hi. The most important thing when writing a new article for Wikipedia is to be absolutely sure it meets our criteria for notability, especially the special section for organisations. The notability must then be confirmed through reliable third party sources. We've already checked and were unable to find any. --Kudpung (talk) 15:08, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]