User talk:Snowolf/Archives/200712
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
test2
Hi there, using subst is always a good idea, I sometimes forget to do that, but you're right that especially in warnings it looks nicer (the beginning user won't see the template). I will read the new suggested templates, thanks - I sort of mechanically transfered my editing behaviors from pl-wiki, which naturally is not particularly wise ;) Pundit|utter 21:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Yo, just wanted my nigga to rip. ya heard me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.76.84.164 (talk) 21:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Good job!
Hey there! I just noticed you reverting about a gazillion edits, so I figured I'd encourage you; nothing's worse than sitting, fighting vandals with nobody to talk to. :) Anyway, keep up the good work! Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 23:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to say that adding "*!?wassup?!*" to every page that comes up when i click on the random aticle button should NOT be considered vandalism. I'm just trying to leave my mark on the world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcky00 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Help!!!!!!
I want to help wikipedia and become an Autobot operator and an Administrator. Please try to make me one!:) User:Russell777 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Russell777 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Admin
I noticed you are an admin scout. I have pondered if that is something that my future might hold. With barely 500 main space edits, I know I am a loooong way off but I was hoping you would offer your wisdom to a newbie and maybe share what you look for in a potential admin and things I can be working on over the coming months (or years). Thanks Gtstricky (talk) 21:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Vandals!
They get everywhere man! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpb140990 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
VP
Thankyou very much!!! Woody (talk) 15:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Admin nomination
I have decided to accept the nomination, but would like a few days to work on the answers to the questions. My understanding is that you make the RfA page for me to work on, but then don't list it right away, right? Also, User:Dincher and User:VerruckteDan have both asked to be co-nominators. Thanks again for asking, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- It isn't listed until you sign it in the I accept section. Prodego talk 03:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
i think it good —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.70.254.193 (talk) 11:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think I will give VerruckteDan three days from the the first notice on his talk page, at which point I will formally accept - assume you want to transclude the nom (or should I?). Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
(unindent) Thanks for the nom again and for the support - assume I did it all OK< was not sure about the time, so I used the time I accepted for the seven days. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Question
This is one of those that you don't have to answer : )
Just curious: what happened to you between June and August? - jc37 18:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Good question. I simply went on what I called a "not announced netbreak". Nothing related to Wikipedia, I just felt I needed some time away from the PC. Snowolf How can I help? 18:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- I can understand that. (Summer vacation? : ) - jc37 18:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yes :) Snowolf How can I help? 18:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Note: I left you a couple questions on your RfA page. - jc37 05:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Redirect of Charlie keene
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Charlie keene, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Charlie keene is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Charlie keene, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- :) I nominated for deletion the article it redirects to ;-) Snowolf How can I help? 09:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
Thanks! I blame it on my nearly-obsessive desire for consistency. :) Black Falcon (Talk) 05:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
You are now an administrator
Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the administrators' how-to guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. Also, some have found the practice exercises at the new admin school useful. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Best wishes, WjBscribe 02:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Congrats, don't mess up :). Feel free to ask me anything. Prodego talk 02:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Good job. bibliomaniac15 04:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations on the mop, Snowolf! :D Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 04:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Alla conquista della perfida Albione
"Un grande potere comporta una grande responsabilità" (cit) ;-) --Jaqen (talk) 02:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
NPWatcher warnings comment
Just a note, reply here. :) Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 05:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Again ;) Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 06:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Congradulations
Just want to congradulate you on the sucessful RFA. ;-).--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 02:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Really, really bad haiku from a new admin
Setting new lows in thank-you spam:
Janitor's new tools
Spam must stop -- will new mop act?
Ooops, .com blocked
New admin, new tools
Earnest newbie furrows brow
Fare thee well Main Page
New mess all about
Sorcerer's Apprentice mop
Not supporter's fault
A. B. so grateful
Wikipedia trembles
Watch out DRV
A. B. wonders why
Copyright always confused
Fair use, farewell, bye
Dear RfA friend,
I will learn, chaos will fade
Thanks so much ... A. B.
You wrote: "confident that this user won't do anything stupid with the tools"[1]
Let's hope so!
In any event, thank you for your support and congratulations on your own successful RfA!
--A. B. (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar!
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For all you do protecting Wikipedia from vandalism. Inparticualr, you blocked a few IPs I've reported today. Tiddly-Tom 19:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC) |
AIV
is backlogged badly, can you please help clear it. Thanks. Marlith T/C 02:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Bluelight page
Hey there, I'm an admin on Bluelight, I see one of our users has submitted an entry on our site a couple of times, even though it's been deleted. Sorry about that, I'm going to tell him to cut it out. If you need to contact me you can get me on infinitejest [at] gmail [dot] com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.195.86.40 (talk) 02:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Indef block on IP's
Hi Snowolf, I noticed that you blocked a couple of IP's indef for vandalism. I also saw that you corrected some of them, but you missed one here, I went ahead and corrected it. I thought I'd just drop a note and give ya a little razz about it. :P Be a a bit more mindful in the future ok? Enjoy the new tools. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 04:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
CSD on User:Garry-punk
You tagged the User:Garry-punk as db-bio. However, it's a user page, and the criteria you have used applies only to articles :) You don't have to be notable to have a userpage, otherwise I think that 95% of us would have a red link ;-) Snowolf How can I help? 16:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- *facepalm* Damnit, I did it again. Yeah, I know user pages aren't subject to that criteria. I'm just completely brain-dead today, evidently. I've hit them by mistake a couple of times today. Fortunately I caught myself before now. Thanks for the note and (presumably) the removal of the csd tag.
- I promise I'm not completely stupid. Maybe I just need to get some more sleep. ;P --HamatoKameko (talk) 16:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey I need a little help.
Ok, I am at a school and there are some jackasses that vandalize alot... Right now i dont have a computer at home, im just lucky i had an account but anyways.... when you block the IP address at our school alot of people cant help out on wiki....
~thank you,
Mr_KC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr kc (talk • contribs) 17:11, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
unblock
please unblock this ip this is a school comp and is used by many people —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jender4 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
I replied. Best regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 23:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
You are now an administrator
and your speedy deletion patrolling is a great way to start-- but you perhaps should keep in mind some clues that there might be something there behind even a very low-quality article. John A. Rich is a MacArthur fellow, and such are always notable--there's always lots of news coverage. At the minimum, it is an unquestionable assertion of notability, no matter how little is said otherwise. (CSD A7 is only for no assertion at all.) Laura Kasischke is a prize winning author. The article didnt say so--in fact it didnt say much of anything, but the b.1961 indicates someone might have a reason & Google shows quite a bit. Ideally, you could undelete and add a little. (this is often the case with authors--people just enter the name and go one.) Alternatively, undelete and I will. DGG (talk) 03:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Block duration?
Hello. I just noticed that when you processed the AIV block request for 164.116.80.225 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), you did an indefinate block [2], but put "24 hours" on the IP's talk page [3]. --Kralizec! (talk) 18:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Having been an admin for only two days myself, I will have to decline doing any reverts! :-) --Kralizec! (talk) 18:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey snow
Hey snow... i talked to you about unblocking our School IP. I have found out who was vandalizing. I saw him in the library. I told him to quit because wikipedia is awsome... well he said he will so we will see... another thing... Apparently it wont let you permanently ban our school IP because each computer has a different IP or it resets every day... One of the two...
But i was just telling you
Mr kc (talk) 19:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
BlueCaper:Response
I was not thinking that I was good enough for an article; I was simply making my page more easily accessible (just in case they forgot the "User:" part). Okay? Okay. BlueCaper (talk) 20:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
UCFD Backlog
Do you feel comfortable with closing deletion discussions? There's currently a backlog at WP:UCFD. - jc37 23:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help : ) - jc37 01:43, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- ;-)
I'm about to run the bot to remove it and clean up the Working page :) Snowolf How can I help? 01:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Remove what? - jc37 01:50, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- What an orrible sentence I wrote :) I meant that I'll have my bot update the pages in the various rename categories and remove the [[:Category:]] from the ones in the delete section. Snowolf How can I help? 01:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I see : ) - jc37 01:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- What an orrible sentence I wrote :) I meant that I'll have my bot update the pages in the various rename categories and remove the [[:Category:]] from the ones in the delete section. Snowolf How can I help? 01:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
I just noted your note on the UCFD talk page. You may want to drop a note to User talk:After Midnight. He and I worked out a solution to that potential issue : ) - jc37 02:36, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my RFA
|
<font=3> Thanks for your support, my request for adminship passed 62/0/0 yesterday!
I want to thank Snowolf and Dincher for nominating me, those who updated the RfA tally, and everyone for their support and many kind words. I will do my best to use the new tools carefully and responsibly (and since you are reading this, I haven't yet deleted your talk page by accident!). Please let me know if there is anything I can do to be of assistance, and keep an eye out for a little green fish with a mop on the road to an even better encyclopedia. Thanks again and take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 16:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|---|
Thanks again for asking me about an RfA and congrats again on your own RfA! Keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 16:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Np Watcher
I've put my name on the approval list, but it's just occurred to me to ask you whether it runs on a mac? Harland1 (t/c) 18:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh well, I'll take my name off the list then. Harland1 (t/c) 19:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
"Vandalism
I'd like to say that adding "*!?wassup?!*" to every page that comes up when i click on the random aticle button should NOT be considered vandalism. I'm just trying to leave my mark on the world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcky00 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 4 December 2007
I'm sorry. How do you create new pages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcky00 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 4 December 2007
Info to the last comment
168.216.111.93 <<<<<< IP address —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr kc (talk • contribs) 17:42, 12 December 2007
Why you erase an article that I try to create?
I'm trying to learn how to create an article in Wikipedia and you just erase it!!!! Why?? My name is Edson and I'm brazilian. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saimin49 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 13 December 2007
Congratulations!!!
Congrats on becoming an admin! I have been watching your Rfa for a while, though I did not want to vote, and if I did I probably would have supported you. I got late to congratulate you becuase I had been busy and just like you I like seeing new Rfas (thats how I came across yours!)..... Use the tools well!--Kushan I.A.K.J (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 37 and 38
Well, gee whiz! I don't check WP:WEEKLY for a few days and look what happens: I miss two new episodes. Nonetheless, Wikipedia Weekly Episode 37 and Episode 38 have been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/10/wikipedia-weekly-37-rundown/ and http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/14/episode-38-interview-wbrianna-laugher/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 02:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
WTF
Do you honestly have no life worthless bitch.
You didn't respond
I'm waiting —Preceding unsigned comment added by Horzamiboon (talk • contribs) 07:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Wow
December 2007 Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Snowolf. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Snowolf How can I help? 07:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
sorry did i hurt your feelings whiny bitch —Preceding unsigned comment added by Horzamiboon (talk • contribs) 07:54, 21 December 2007
Hey snowolf
Hey snow i wanted to know if you could help me... you guys have that thing it says your online and i tried updating that... is there a way i could get one... plz and thank you
--Mr kc 16:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Mr kc 16:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Help
Sorry if your getting tired of me but i like your help... When i put my signature it wont link it... Why?/ and is there a way to edit the signature.... like somepeople have it in color--Mr kc 17:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- just adding on to tell you thank you also its a semi test to see if your advise worked, also i dont know if i heard right maybe i didnt but... you see where it says (talk) how would i be able to change that??? if i can --Mr_KC (talk) 17:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thanks again --Mr_KC (talk) 18:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
about the barnstar thing... (sorry im still learning) :P Mr_KC (talk) 18:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Hehe
[4] --Oxymoron83 19:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:57, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
AntiVandal Tool
Any idea why its reporting [ and < as bad words? I'd ask Lupin but you seem to be active at the moment. Master of Puppets Care to share? 20:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm. I saw that it still works, just... not quite. I'll go tell Lupin. I'm thinking that maybe that edit screwed up the all-powerful .js code, and it refuses to revert or something. Master of Puppets Care to share? 20:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
mah, ti va un po' di aranciata per festeggiare? --.snoopy. 22:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
sorry
I am sorry if I offended you, or the Wikipedia staff. I apologize. Please respond. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.69.16 (talk) 23:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
"at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:X5, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make"
i thought template:x5 was a sandbox. it even says: "You may also use the templates X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, and X9 for experimental purposes."
sorry if im not allowed to write this here too, but it did look like i was allowed to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.143.44 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 18 December 2007
oops
looks like i did manage to do the last bit wrong by not having a title... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.143.44 (talk) 23:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk page deletions
Sorry, the material I was deleting was from a nasty little troll. DJ CreamityOh Yeah! 02:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 39
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 39 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/18/episode-39-knol-pointer/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 06:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Thank you for taking care of the Administrator intervention against vandalism report page ... my report was taken care of within minutes and Snowolf was also nice enough to take the time to give me some advice on using the report - thanks for that Ukt-zero (talk) 12:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC) |
You de-listed User:City warming from AIV with the statements of no final warning. If you'd look at the talk page, there was a final warning posted at 12:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC), yet the user continued to re-create the article in question at 12:40, December 19, 2007 (UTC). The talk page for this user also shows they're presistant on re-creating material which has been CSD'ed more than once. Yngvarr 12:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into it. Hope I didn't sound harsh above, was just trying to present the case. Yngvarr 12:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
FYI
I've upped your username block of Hazeltheturkeyfarmfaceinyourfacemunchingonyourhips (talk · contribs) to include a block on account creation. This is a user who likes to create obviously unacceptable names, such as Bonerific (talk · contribs), then claim it is a reference to his/her occupation. - auburnpilot talk 15:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
sorry please dont block me 81.195.5.132 (talk) 17:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
hey
Hey snow... does wiki have a forums... or do they have a place i can post suggestions Mr_KC (talk) 17:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thank you i put my suggestion here is it alright... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29 Mr_KC (talk) 17:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Vandalproof application
I see. Thanks for pointing out the number of edits. I am aware of policies and proceedures, however your talk page was elusive to me and so I did the next best thing -- sorry! Can I suggest you include clearer/visible links to it so that this may be avoided? Many thanks. Showjumpersam (talk) 13:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Why are you reveritng edits by Polbot ?
You seem to have reverted several edits by Polbot ? (on Image pages) is there a reason they look OK to me? lɘɘяɘM яɘɫƨɐƮ 14:08, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I see ...Overzealous over empowered bot syndrome ... Thanks .....lɘɘяɘM яɘɫƨɐƮ 14:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
statistiche
ciao, scusa dove trovo queste statistiche? c'è qualche tool? :-) --.snoopy. 21:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- si quello lo so, dicevo le altre sugli edit e sull'ordine di registrazione :) --.snoopy. 21:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
My NPWatch application
Hi Snowwolf! Congratulations on becoming an admin, but in all honesty I think you have just made your first mistake. After being approved for NPWatch, the second automatic tool I have received approval for -the other being AWB-,you seem to have thought it was necessary to remove my approval because I have to little experience with CSD tagging. Can you explain that to me, as I have never tagged an article that was re-tagged or not deleted that I am aware of and have done so on enough articles to consider using NPWatch in the near future. And also, knowing WP:CSD off-by-heart I thought I was all set. I think you have made a mistake and would also like to know how you check if somebody has enough CSD experience - as these are deleted edits and do not show up on the edit count or anywhere except my own preferences pages afaiaa. Poeloq (talk) 23:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Marlith T/C 05:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Regarding edits on Elizabeth I
May I know what's wrong with my editions? Can you please enlighten me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.14.19.34 (talk) 06:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
It was spelt with a v in the past as it was called then. And why did you remove Virgin Qveen without any reason? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.14.19.34 (talk) 06:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Talkpage vandalism
The IP that was vandalising your usertalk page (83.15.197.2) has been blocked. ;-) Lradrama 19:33, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ooops! Hehe, you're very welcome, I was glad to help out. :-) Lradrama 19:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
WP:AIV
Hi, thank's for the notice about AIV. The most recent "final warning" for the IP was on Sept. 6th, and the user vandalised here, and here that I could find. I didn't quite notice how old the notices were, so thanks for the note about that. --θnce θn this island Speak! 19:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Ban Request
can i please request a ban on 87.115.2.78 as they are adding inapropriate information on many pages,
thank you--hotdawg57 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hotdawg57 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you kindly
I just saw that you reverted that troll account's edits on my user page. I was in the middle of writing something long and drawn out, a sort of "help the newbie" essay, and hadn't yet realized that the user was indeed a troll. --GoodDamon 20:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
hey
woah, im just wondering why you keep deleting the page about Frau Caster —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanbrownwiki (talk • contribs) 20:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
ru gay????
what was the need to change back my comment on the warriors. it was the truth and all i was doing is speaking it. that was a very gay move gay boy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.192.105 (talk) 23:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
re:Adopter
Thanks, Snowolf. I updated my name and activity. I'm currently a bit inactive due to a hectic school work schedule, the Christmas holidays and other reasons. For these reasons I am a bit inactive at the moment, but I hope to be back soon. Thanks for informing me, and sorry for forgetting! Jack?! 23:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I completely forgot! :P I recently adopted someone, but he's not that active right now so I could take more. Thanks for the reminder ~ Bella Swan 00:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Double redirects
Hey, you recently reverted one of my edits, and commented in my talk page. I had originally made that edit to prevent double redirects when I moved the Thomas the Tank Engine and Friends to Thomas and Friends. After all that work, however, it still said there were double redirects. If you would like to help, I would be greatful. Thanks. Tavix (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism revert on my user page
Thanks! I really appreciate the heads-up! --Mhking (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Meant to do this earlier...
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| I, delldot, hereby award you this defender of the wiki barnstar for your excellent anti-vandal work. Also, I love how un-trollable you are! You remain completely unprovoked by hostile stuff (see above on this talk page). :) delldot talk 14:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC) |
Catherine Stewart
Hello Snowolf, can you look again if this edit was planned in that way? Looks like editconflicting. The second person this article is about needs a separate article, but doesn't seem to be notable (google endorses this theory), that's way I reverted further back. Regards --Oxymoron83 15:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
revert
I reverted User talk:220.231.124.6 edit to your user page --Antonio Lopez (talk) 01:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Re: AIV Report
Actually, I made the mistake of thinking a blatant vandal template was a level 4 warning. Thanks for the heads up! STORMTRACKER 94 14:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Whoops! I have to be more careful! STORMTRACKER 94 14:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
You may want to protect it, based on this and this. - Rjd0060 (talk) 16:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Guess you've stepped away so I RFPP'd that page. Also, something is wrong with your talk page sections; I clicked "edit" on this comment and it said "no such section". I had to click edit on the previous comment to edit this comment. Weird. - Rjd0060 (talk) 16:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
Dear Snowolf, I wanted to wish you a very Merry Christmas and all the best for the New Year! Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 19:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Babbo Natale (talk) 19:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
a gift
- Thanks Santa!! Snowolf How can I help? 01:38, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
I went shopping and got you a billion electrons! They've been shipped to you and are now surrounding you. :) Cheers, and happy holidays, Master of Puppets Care to share? 03:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
banning User:65.33.127.137
It looks like you banned the above IP for 24 hours yesterday. He's at it again: check out the article on 2006. I don't know how to report this, except to ask for your help. atakdoug (talk) 03:30, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Reporting Image Stolen!
This image http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c2/JediExileCanon.jpg Is not made from this guy.
It was this woman from Malaysia http://aimo.deviantart.com/
Here's the original image.
http://aimo.deviantart.com/art/Tender-19667892 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darth Prejudice (talk • contribs) 07:04, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Added comment
Will you Adopt Me i'm new. →Shapers→ 16:39, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Response
I've responded at my talk page. →Shapers→ 19:48, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Vandal Proof
Thanks for the help! It works now. jj137 ♠ 03:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Tanti Auguri!
 |
Tanti Tanti Auguri Snowolf/Archives/200712 --FiloSottile the best or the beast? |
 |
Dupont Circle
I'm just wondering about the reason for your reversion of a recent edit to Category:Dupont Circle. Thanks. 69.143.61.106 (talk) 13:15, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
A new flavor of SALT
Hello, I'm dropping you a note because you are listed on Wikipedia:Protected titles/Specific Admin as an admin that is maintaining a personal SALT page. Recent software updates now allow deleted pages to be protected just like other pages. Please consider migrating any pages on your personal list to normal protections, and clearing them off of your list. There still may be situations where a personal list may be the best way to handle a page though. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 02:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Dear Snowolf/Archives, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind support on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (72/19/6).
Now that I am a sysop, do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.
Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — E talk 12:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
NPW bug
Hi there- long time, no chat! I'll hopefully be getting back on IRC some time soon. Anyway, I have recently downloaded the new NPW, and I am having problems with AfDs. I have nominated two articles for deletion so far, and I have had to clean up the nominations afterwards. I'll show you the diffs- [5] [6] [7] [8]. My concern comes from the all the +s and the fact it is adding the AfDs at the bottom of the list. Is that a problem at my end, or do I need to wait for Martinp23 to return? Alternatively, can you do anything about it? Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 17:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks very much. I'll nominate manually for the time being. J Milburn (talk) 17:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for blocking User_talk:70.129.22.217, you guys/gals are quicker than the time it takes to find where to report an incident! Joshdboz (talk) 22:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
you
the fbi is sueing you for 1 billion dollars. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.254.69.245 (talk) 22:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Personally, I don't think so. The Federal Bureau of Investigation would probably have spelled the message correctly, and probably used a lawyer to do it too. :P Snowolf How can I help? 22:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
hey
can you explain me why you accused me of having mutliple accounts? please read the coments I left on my talk page. I am not Darko Trifunovic, I am only writing and editing the article about him. I see that in recent weeks a muslim hacker caled Afan Pasalic is leading online campaign against Dr. Trifunovic and are constantly trying to change my article inputing false information. As I've been told I have no right to protect the article from editing (even though I am the creator) and honestly I am tiered of changing it back to original and engaging into the edit war. If you have any other solution to offer me I would appreciate it. In the meantime please look at the link for verification:
http://www.terrorfinance.org/the_terror_finance_blog/2007/12/al-qaeda-media.html
muslims are continuously having the campagn against antiterrorist intellectuals and are trying to misinform the public.
if you know how to help, please do so. otherwise dont accuse me without knowing the subject previously.
thanks. Sh3 (talk) 12:37, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Cyric the One
Thanks. --Jack Merridew 15:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello again!
Sorry to continuously bother you, but I was wondering what I should do in this situation; I suspect a user of sockpuppetry (specifically, User:Lastchild being the master and User:Rzgofv being the puppet). The evidence is that Rzgofv participated in an AFD of an article they never even edited,[9] and that was their first and only contribution. I find it hard to believe that a new user would make a beeline for AFD.
The thought crossed my mind to report this at Suspected Sockpuppets, but I didn't think that was necessary; after all, the puppet isn't being used malevolently, and the user is fairly new, so I don't want to WP:BITE him. I instead will leave a message on their talk page letting them know.
I brought this up here to ask your opinion on whether I've taken the right action. Hope you don't mind, and cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 05:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sidenote Here's my diff of the message I left on the user's talk page;[10] Basically, I tried not to point too much blame, but just sort of get them out of the habit. Master of Puppets Care to share? 05:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- I always do, just this time it seemed a bit too unlikely to be separate users... thanks for leaving the note on AFD though! Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 19:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, at least now I know what I am being accused of. I'm not a meat or sock puppet regardless of what my "master" thinks. Thank you for at least Assuming Good Faith, Snowolf. Ya'll can take down my article if you wish, but the snide accusations do leave a bad taste. I don't know or care who Rzgovf is but I would assume he is another user of the program. Sorry to crap up your talk page, but I was being discussed here. edit in. By the way, I like Wikipedia and believe in what it is trying to do. I always use it as a starting point when I'm trying to find out about something. I've tried to edit in an appropriate way, and I'll not let this tiny controversy color my future usage. Lastchild (talk) 21:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Adoption
I would like to be adopted.--RandomGuy 9929 (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2007 (UTC)