User talk:Sinhi619

December 2019

Hello, I'm Subwaymuncher. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sindh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.   Sub |_HMU  14:13, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.--VViking_TalkEdits 14:18, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Repeat removal of sourced material; please discuss major edits on talk page

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Biased content, unethical and fake content

Dear

I have seen fake content on Wikipedia which has been edited by someone who does not have knowledge about Sindh and wants to heart there feeling, misguide, and degrade peoples living in this area. so I have tried to edit, but there are peoples who just their supremacy and are do not want to get out from there nutshell and not want to see the facts.

Kindly block this article or remove all nonsense

There so much fake information in this page which I have seen in the language section, History section which should have been removed immediatley

December 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sindh. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Sinhi619, you really should take note of these words. Wikipedia isn't a blog where you can add your own opinions. If you believe the existing text in Sindh doesn't represent some views well enough, then please bring it up on the talk page. – Uanfala (talk) 16:35, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Kindly remove incorrect information in this page

I have noticed there is information which totally biased and factually incorrect. which should have a need to modify some one who is a good representative of Sindh, not some one who does not know anything about Sindh History, Culture, tradition and Language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinhi619 (talk • contribs)

The information you're attempting to remove has reliable citations. If you want to challenge it, you need to go to Talk:Sindh with new citations. What you cannot do is substitute your own opinions for what is in the article without changing the existing citations: in so doing you make it appear that the authors of the citations said things which they did not really say. - MrOllie (talk) 12:52, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

I have checked this article contain a lot of unguided and wrong information regarding which I have as per my best affords I have edited it. whatever your personal opinion about Sindh would not be considered as true mostly the history of Sindh has been written in the Sindhi language from where you can check History no other books have contained the major part of Sindh history and Mostly in Pakistan Studies do not tell about Sindh history. If you have any reliable reference you can share. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinhi619 (talk • contribs)

OK, but you won't fix it by edit warring. You must go to Talk:Sindh with new citations. - MrOllie (talk) 18:02, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Let me edit it. don't undo my work it is under process. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinhi619 (talk • contribs)

December 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sindh seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

• You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sindh; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--regentspark (comment) 18:26, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

CLCStudent well i do not know what you call Neutral point. I have added more Neutral point which you have removed. because according to your personal belive and opinion there not Neutral point. If you do not know about Sindh and Sindhi language you can not write anything Neutral point.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Sindh. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  regentspark (comment) 01:18, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

For what reason I have been blocked explain in brief. With proper refrence.

Edit warring. See WP:3RR. You are not allowed to revert another editor more than three times. Regardless of whether you're right or wrong. --regentspark (comment) 22:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)