User talk:Shshshsh/Archive 33

Re:Filmfare

Hi Shahid. Thanx for responding to the comment.

Your suggestions are good, but I think there are some clarifications required :-

• For one thing, the Filmfare Awards are called the Idea Filmfare Awards. Idea has a lot of stress. It is an important commercial sponsor of Filmfare, and is also the primary sponsor of mobile telecast of Filmfare Awards. The Oscars do not have any such sponsors - they are directly managed by AMPAS. So here, I believe it is necesary.

• What exactly do you mean by simple and published nominee? If there are nominees for any category, then they come under the main category. If there aren't any nominees in a category, then it comes under technical and other awards. Simple.

• The infobox of Filmfare Awards is modelled upon that of the Oscars. I don't see any problem with utilising it. Even if there aren't any previous Filmfare Awards articles, you needn't mention that. There is no option for that in the Filmfare infobox. So, I think it is better that it stays.

Just tell me what you think.

Cheers,

Ankitbhatt (talk) 06:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

I strongly disagree with the removal of the infobox. I believe that it should exist, no matter what. The others - you have a good point. I'll change it as soon as I can, though I am having a few problems with the article 54th Idea Filmfare Awards, so it can take time.

Ankitbhatt (talk) 07:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Putting the Idea part in the telecast part. I think the first few Filmfare articles are coming out rather nicely. However, I'm looking for a photo as logo for the Awards, just like the Oscars. I'm not getting a totally free one, and I'm finding difficulty obtaining a photo so that I can photograph it and upload it myself. If you find one, please notify me.

Ankitbhatt (talk) 07:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

In her whole career, Bipasha has got only two nominations. That obviously deserves a mention! And about the table itself, what's the problem? The article you showed me also has the same table. In fact, I took the table from that article!!!! So...I believe it is not a waste of energy or time, and gives a nice summary for the whole awards ceremony.

Ankitbhatt (talk) 09:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Look. don't misunderstand me. First of all, I need to write SOMETHING in the notes...if there are no firsts or records, what am I supposed to do? Second, if there are any special cases or rarities, i'm gonna include them. u can do the same, if u wish.

Ankitbhatt (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

U obtained the full list? the FULL LIST? that's great! Can you tell me whether the full nominees list for 54th Filmfare Awards is also given in ur source? As for the nomination records...hmm..yeah...I think we can first complete the nominations list, and then write the records. Though we can leave the records for now.

Cheers!

Ankitbhatt (talk) 10:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Didn't u get the nominees list from some website? I think u need references for that.

Ankitbhatt (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanx a lot man!! I'm gonna do the same! Gr8 work! Let's do it!!!!

Ankitbhatt (talk) 10:42, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi there! Why did you remove the nominations from the Critic's awards? They r not incorrect - on the contrary, they are absolutely correct, as I saw the actual Filmfare awards and put them up. Plz revert ur edit.

Ankitbhatt (talk) 09:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah...I saw the awards later and I didnt see any nominations...wonder what I saw wrong...anyways, thanx! How is the work on 55th Filmfare Awards going on?

Ankitbhatt (talk) 04:59, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Re

I don't know why but a lot of people accuse us of being the same person. It is probably due to the similarity in our editing. Anyways buddy, so what's new? Did you watch the 55th Filmfare Awards? (P.S. How come you didn't respond to User talk:Shshshsh#New message 2?) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:27, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

The winners of the 82nd Academy Awards were of no surprise to me but I was definitely surprised to see The Hurt Locker winning the Best Picture over Avatar. I haven't seen the former yet, so I cannot comment on it. However, I have heard a lot of good stuffs from the people who have already seen it. Bridges, Waltz and Mo'Nique completely deserved the awards... but IMO I don't think Sandra Bullock deserved it. They should've given it to anyone else but why Ms. Bullock? What did you think about it.

BTW, Shahid I have another question. How would you list the box office revenue of 3I? According to BOI, the film has grossed Rs. 201,38,00,000. Would you list it as Rs. 1,201 million or 2,014 million?? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 02:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

I am talking about reporting it on Kapoor's article... in her career section. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello!!

Hello Shahid! How good to hear from you. Yes I'm staying as Blofeld now. If a few people don't like me or why work who cares? Yes as you can see I've done a bit of work on Bollywood. I started a few of Dixit's films today like Swati (film) and a few others. We are lacking a lot of 80s Bollywood films it seems as this was the bad phase I understand! I did want to expand the Chopra article today but the reason why the coverage of her 2005 films for instance is poor is because there doesn't seem much to say! Hey I was thinking of nominating the Deol article for GA. What do you think? Although some ip keeps vandalising it see the history.. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 20:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Don't want a conversation eh? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 23:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

No! I just came across the article and thought it looked crap!! I was also going to make a start on the Devendra article but I got scared with his sheer number of films!! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:14, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey! Ever heard of Jill Hennessy? Extremely hot. Check out this. She looks like Catherine Zeta's twin! And here looks like Shania's twin here. She like a cross between Zeta and Shania AND she plays guitar and rides motorbikes and is a whole lot of fun. Wow! She's really cool. But you have to see her on screen to see what I mean about the sexiness. Oh I'm being spoiled. Last night I watched The Specialist with Sharon Stone, tonight Exit Wounds... Stone and Hennessy are definately amongst the hottest women I've ever come across on screen. I must admit I have a thing for 80s/90s Hollywood action films... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 22:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad you agree. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 15:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

From this moment on is my favourite and I love the video too when she is walking through the corridor. I actually also have it on Voice (Neal Schon album). I can play the whole album note for note. You would love it. All the great ballads played on rock guitar. I'll try to find you a CD clip. It has Mariah Carey, Celion Dion etc also on it but it sounds beautfiful played on guitar. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 16:12, 28 March 2010 (UTC) Only Avatar. I had to go see what the hype was about. The local cinema sadly shut down in my town about a year and a half ago so I don't get to the cinema much these days. I have to go into Cardiff across the city to go the UCI complex.. How about you? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 17:22, 28 March 2010 (UTC) What was the The Hurt Locker like? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 18:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC) I was surprised actually that Avatar didn't win best film. Did you see Invictus? Good film but not as good as I'd anticipated. The Deol article is currently awaiting GA review BTW. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:13, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah totally surprised about Bullock. I've always found her really cute, not hot as such but just a lovely person, attractive with a wonderful goofy personality but I had not thought her Oscar worthy. I did not see her performance so I couldn't say but it seems funny that she won both an Oscar and a Razzer. I think she probably deserves it though after all her years of hard work in films. Before the release of Invictus I had actually thought that it was the sort of film to win major Academy Awards, like Morgan Freeman best actor. In my view he is one of the best living actors if not the best, De Niro and Al Pacino are up there too. Funny but Jeff Bridges was always a better actor than Eastwood. In fact when they starred together in Thunderbolt and Lightfoot Eastwood though his performance was Oscar worthy but it was shunned for Oscar nominations in favor of his costar Bridges! But in terms of living legendary status Eastwood as both an actor and especially as a director he tops Hollywood in my view. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 17:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

List of highest-grossing Bollywood films

I saw your comments about the matter of combined tables. My response is:-

• First, a combined table will list the figures of both BOI and IBOS, and also their average. I will not eliminate either one from the combined table. In this way, viewers can see both BOI and IBOS figures. It will be stated in the article that we are ranking the films according to their average, and not by individual sources. So, I believe confusion can be removed and the article will look considerably better. I can understand what you are trying to say. But, the fact is, since Indian films do not have a specific source for BO collections (unlike Hollywood films), it will be much better if we take only one table, so as to put the list more on par with the List of highest-grossing films.

• Secondly, whether you want to believe it or not, it is a well-known fact that IBOS is "anti-khan". I am not speculating. It is visible by seeing the net collections of SRK, Aamir and Salman - all of their films have under-reported figures. Compared to that, films like Kambakkht Ishq, which was a below-average performer in India and netted about 35-40 crores, is claimed to have netted 56 crores in India by IBOS. This is plain nonsense and a blatant lie. This anti-khan attitude itself makes the idea of a combined table appealing and necessary.

So please, think about this issue a little more.

Ankitbhatt (talk) 08:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

PLEASE ALLOW

Please allow me add that graph to Karan Johar's article and Why are you telling that it is unnecessary and unimportant? On the James Cameron article it has same casting graph too. You mean it is not necessary for a bollywood filmmaker? Please think about it and let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surper1988west (talk • contribs) 13:17, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Bollywoodhungama.com Pictures Being Used On Pages of Hindi Actors?

Hey Shahid, why is this happening? Wiki rules say we can't use copyrighted pictures, correct? AyanP (talk) 01:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Ayan

Where is (s)he getting the permission? Does (s)he work for the site? AyanP (talk) 21:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Koffee With Rahul :)

Hey buddy... how are you?? I have come with a small game: "Koffee With Rahul". Here is your rapid fire. Let's see how well you perform.

1. Madhuri or Sridevi: the better actress/dancer
2. Sridevi or Karisma: the actress that you want to see back on the big screen again
3. Kajol or Karisma: the better actress
4. Preity or Rani: the better actress
5. Kareena or Priyanka: the better actress
6. Ranbir or Imran: the actor with the better future
7. Deepika or Sonam: the actress with the better future
8. Aish or Priyanka: who is the prettier (Miss World)
9. Sush or Lara: who is the prettier (Miss Universe)
10. The last film you saw that you really liked
11. The last film you saw that you felt was "pure torture"
12. Your all-time favorite performance/film of Preity
13. Shahrukh, Salman, Aamir & Saif: Rank them in order
14. Kajol, Rani, Preity, Aish, Kareena and Priyanka: Rank them in order

-- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 15:53, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Urdu script can't be removed until consensus is reached

Hello Shshshsh. This removal of Urdu script seems to be contrary to a prior agreement. If you have recently obtained consensus to continue removing Urdu script from film articles, can you please point to where such consensus was obtained? If not, please undo any removals until such time this has been decided. I became aware of this because a user notified me at User:EdJohnston#Hello. My prior notice to you was at User talk:Shshshsh#Result of the 3RR complaint. It was briefly proposed that the restriction would expire on 31 March, but the actual closure of the 3RR report does not mention March 31. The restriction on removing or adding Urdu script continues *indefinitely* until a consensus has been reached at some appropriate place. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

N. T. Rama Rao

HI. Can you put this article on your watchlist? For some reason it attracts ridiculous edits. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 19:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Really? What about renaming the sectnio Early life and background then? I really don't like the section name "Biography", as the career info is as much his biography as the other. Its not a book.. OK restore it to how it was but change the header title to Early life and background then. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 20:09, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Indian animation industry‎‎

hi Shahid, Thanks for your valuable contribution to Indian Film Industry. You have written a very nice article on Bollywood. You seems to be expert on indian cinema. currently another article Indian animation industry‎‎ is in bad shape. i'm working on it and needs you help in restructuring. Since animation industry is new to india and there is no literature on it. can you have a look on it and suggest what we can do with it. cheers! --Onef9day (talk) 10:29, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Hey buddy... I have come to ask a small favor from you. As you know, I am currently working on Kapoor's article in my sandbox for a while. However, I am yet to be finished and I am planning on adding some new information. When you have the time, could you please take a look at it and let me know what you think of it so far and/or ways that I could improve it further. I would really appreciate this. Thanks :) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 16:52, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

What do you think of this section? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey... I completely understand what you're saying but I have one thing to say. Globus NEVER asked her to launch her own clothing line; they just signed on Kapoor to be their brand ambassador and model for their clothing. However, Kapoor's decision to launch her own clothing line was completely different and has no direct connection to this. The source completely states that since she is often regarded as a popular style icon amongst the youth, she decided to launch her own clothing line for Globus, and now she has plans of launching her own brand. Considering the fact that she is also the first Indian actress to do so also makes it an important and interesting addition to the article. This is pretty similar to what Victoria Beckham has done in her career. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 01:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes... and that is why I felt that this section should be included on her article. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 16:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Shahid, earlier you had mentioned something about synthesis. While going through Kapoor's first FAC, I also noticed that some users talked about that. Do you know what "synthesis" exactly means? Is this and this examples of it? (P.S. I am looking to find some editors who can help me with copyediting the article. Can you help with it?) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 16:31, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

So let's say you're trying to prove this claim "she was recognized by critics for displaying greater versatility as an actress". You cannot use a source like this but a source like this? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:41, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

"She later explained that she enjoyed shooting for the film after the heavy role of Avantika Ahuja".[1] Do you think this is okay or should I completely remove it?? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 18:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

It's good to make all these things clear before Kapoor's article goes through a gruelling FAC. Thanks :) After I'm done with the article, I'm looking to find a couple of editors that can help me with copyediting it. Do you think you can help out? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank You :) BTW Shahid, what would be the procedure to include other prominent awards (Star Screen, Zee Cine, IIFA & Stardust) on an actor's filmography apart from Filmfare & NFA. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Question on pictures

I was reading that pictures on Flickr may be usable, not I am not sure. There are a lot good pictures of Karan Johar there http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=karan+johar. The one on his Wiki page Karan Johar is terrible. Would it be okay if I picked a new one for him? How can I find out in general where to get good pictures for articles? Bollyjeff (talk) 13:35, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Any advice on this topic???? Bollyjeff (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Hellooooo!!

Hehe. I hardly expected you to remember LOL. If you've got a lot on your mind it is easy to even forget what day it is anyway!!! A lot of the time I'm not even conscious of the date! How are you? I've been watching films for most of the day. You know I said about Sharon Stone being the hottest on screen? Maybe the sexiest but the most beautiful in my view is a young Tia Carrere. So extremely hot!!! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 21:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

See this. Pause at 0.01. Doesn't she look cute? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:44, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

I thought you put N. T. Rama Rao on your watchlist? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

I can't remember!! Anything else of youtube with chopra in it? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 20:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Hey have a read of the Style section to Aldona Gustas. I love it when I get a chance to write like that. Thats why I was the only person in the United Kingdom to get 100% on a Shakespeare A-level paper!

Did you hear about Noemie Lenoir's attempted suicide? I cannot believe it. She is one of the most beautiful women and always looks like she is the happiest girl alive. Unlike many super models who looks sulky and look like they want to die she just always seems to glean and give off positivity. Surprising isn't it? You;d think she has everything, I bet there are la lot of infurirated ugly girls right now who could never dream of looking like her and she was going to throw it all away! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:37, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Madonna

Dear Shahid, since you promoted the Preity Zinta bio to FA, you have a fair understanding of biography and what it entails to have a proper encyclopedic article on a living person. I have nominated Madonna for FA here, will you be interested to shed some of your thoughts on the article and whether this can pass being a Featured article on Wikipedia? Thanks --Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:05, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Mallika Sherawat

Shahid,

Here is the source where Mallika was appreciated for her acting in Ugly aur pagli

http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movies/review/13742/index.html

I will add more sources and improve Mallika page tomorrow. Let help me in improving the articles.

Honestly, Please be patient in editing. We need to improve Indians articles rather than defaming them.

I will collect more sources and try to improve it. Thanks for your understanding.

OK. So lets accept that and remove the panning sentence. I m going to remove that now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandutweets (talk • contribs) 06:17, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Shahid, I have improved initial description on Mallika page with proper sources. Please take a look. Help me to improve the sentence formation and grammar.

Shahid, I provided proper sources from BBC and CNN sites. Are they unecyclopedic? Please explain your latest edit chandu (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2010 (UTC) Regards Chandu —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Sichandu (talk) 09:47, 28 May 2010 (UTC)gnatures|unsigned]] comment added by Chandutweets (talk • contribs) 14:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

New message

Shahid, I am currently planning to expand the "In the media" section on Kapoor's article with some new information but before that I would like to ask you for your advice. Remember when Kapoor first entered Bollywood, she was often described by the Indian media as being arrogant and was consequently labelled as a "brat" due to her outspoken nature [about her co-stars, other actors/actresses, etc] - this ultimately lead to many controversies. Do you think this would be important enough to add to the section or is it completely unnecessary? Another thing I wanted to ask you about is this. Kapoor had earlier written the foreword in Rujuta Diwekar’s first book whilst she is currently writing a chapter in Diwekar's second book, which is due for release later this year. Would you consider this notable enough to add to the article? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:09, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

I remember hearing about the Khalid-Kareena fallout, but I can't seem to find the article anymore. Do you remember where you read it? (P.S. Don't worry about it buddy. I know how busy life can be. Take your time - that is what I am doing. :)) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 18:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

LOL I'm not angry with you, I miss you!! but you missed my last two messages posted over a week ago! I wanted to know what you were going to say about the Naomi Lenoir attempted suicide.... I thought you may have been busy but as I keep seeing your name lighting up on my watchlist I wondered what you were doing! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Chandusweeties you mean? LOL. Are you still in Melbourne? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:39, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Sometimes.:) What about you? What are you doing nowadays? Shahid • ^Talk2me 12:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

I still in beautiful Wales. Increasing my interest in classical music and jazz! LOL Sarvagnya. He was a living joke wasn't he. LOL I almost forgot about him. Haha LOL. I can still never understand what the deal was with that guy...LOL have a read of the geography section of Sangla Hill.. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 20:19, 19 May 2010 (UTC) Haha, that made me laugh!!! I so miss speaking to you!!! Yes he used to name everything in the wiki lawyer book didn't he!! Ole Professor Snape... What I never understood is why he really cared so much as to prove resources as "non RS" or "copyvios". He had some hidden agenda I'm sure. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 21:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

LOL! Like The Daily Star you mean? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 18:52, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

I heard Ronan Keating had an affair with one of his dancers. She's pretty hot! But I think I'll write about all the sordid details in his article LOL. I suppose Jimbo could always start a Wiki Tabloid.... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 18:56, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Its funny though what some people think is appropriate to some of these articles. Clueless.... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 19:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Have a look at all of my articles yesterday and today!! I've got like 5 DYK noms on the go at the moment!! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 21:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC) Yeah, see User:Dr. Blofeld/DYK. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 14:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Ever heard of Odette Yustman? Check her out. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 15:57, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Farah Khan page edit

Today, you (Undid revision 363904889 by Amarendramulye (talk) sources?)

Article Entertainment Ke Liye Kuch Bhi Karega mentions Farah as a judge, and a quick google search would bring up numerous sources. You could always add one instead of deleting the edit, no? Why are you so quick to delete other peoples work, in general, not just in this article? Bollyjeff (talk) 20:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

There is a source in the Entertainment Ke Liye Kuch Bhi Karega article, so I added it back with a ref to that page. I left off the part about the 'famous sentance'. Bollyjeff (talk) 00:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

That same person just made another similar edit to Farah's page without a link or source. I added the link. Sometimes I wish that Wikipedia would disallow edits until people have a proer login and usertalk page setup, because now there is no way to contact them. I can see why maybe you get frustratedd and just delete stuff :-) Bollyjeff (talk) 15:34, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

TZP

I responded on my talk page. -Classicfilms (talk) 20:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Do you think...

this is true?? ;) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Have you seen Kites yet? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 02:01, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes... but overall I was quite disappointed. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 16:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

IIFA

whatever happened to the discussion that is supposed to take place? If yourself don't bother to post your opinion (which is why a discussion was needed in the first place), I don't see how people will even know what the issue is about. I believe that you are a far more experienced Wiki User. May be you should take the lead. I have to say since i'm pretty new to this, I have no idea of how long it takes for a discussion to start. Lotadutt (talk) 10:19, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Bollywood

Aloha Shahid. Two things. I've remade a side template for Indian films but only for the specific industry. See Bollywood films of 1950. I think it now looks better. Second, please comment at WP:FIlms talk page. I've proposed new parameters for the infbox film. "Extremely important" was a bit of an exaggeraition but choreographer. playback singers and art director are more important in Bollywood than other industries are they not? Would you support a Template:Infobox Indian film maybe with specific requirements as I've suggested? Oh also, you didn't tell me what you thought of Odette Yustman. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 14:28, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Check out this I made.17:14, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Hey buddy, I need to ask you something. Remember I told you before that after her role as "Poo" in K3G, Kapoor went on to play similar type of character in her films from 2002-03, which further established her on-screen as well as her off-screen image. Over here, she describes her role in Chameli as an attempt to change her on-screen image. Her portrayal in the film helped her establish a new on-screen image as an actress. Do you think this would be a good thing to add to the article or do you find it quite unnecessary? If I do add that, would I have to change the last paragraph in the "Debut and breakthrough (2000–03)" section or would it be okay the way it is? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 06:05, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

If its important then add it! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:49, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Hey Shahid I'll do one for Bollywood if you want it. If you could give me a list of say 50 actors you think should be included would you accept that to appear in the article? I know you said about it being POV if we have just a few like Amitabh and Rai for instance but if we have like all of the major Bollywood actors would this seem fairer to you. If you would accept a similar one for Bollywood in the article then I'll do it. The problem is that for many of the older actors we don't have free images... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Like Nargis for instance. It should be possible to do a "modern Bollywood" montage though. If only old Bollywood images were public domain... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

OMG I think I'm in love with Ana Vidović. Shahid watch this. She is one of the best guitarists I've ever heard in my life not to mention beautiful, and that's saying something!! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Haha LOL. Well... But this girl.... Have a look at this. Hasn't she got the most beautiful lips and skin!! She's amazing! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 14:24, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm sick of ip vandals. I just noticed that an ip completely changed the plot see here and the article hit the main page of wikipedia as a DYK with the different plot. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks! Well I noticed that the director article was also missing so it was a double DYK. Obviously you didn't see it on the main page! Me neither! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:05, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Koi..._Mil_Gaya

I added a comment in Talk:Koi... Mil Gaya about removing the "series". If you agree, I would like to do the work of purging it from everywhere on Wikipedia. Bollyjeff (talk) 18:21, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Shahid, would a source like this be okay to use on Kapoor's article? Do you know what Template:YouTube is for? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 03:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Shahid, I need a favor from you. After a long and exhausting schedule of editing, I have finally managed to finish with Kapoor's article, and I am planning on nominating the article for a FAC. However, before doing so, I am looking for a couple of editors that can help me with copyediting the article. Would you be able to help me with this? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 05:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks :) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

I NEVER said that the version found on Kareena Kapoor's article was ready for FAC... I was talking about the draft version found in my sandbox, which I have been working on for the past several months. I agree with most of your edits on the original article and have implemented them in my draft version. However, some of your revised edits sound weird to me and I have left them the way it was originally. Thanks :) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 01:04, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

The only edits that I found weird were the re-written versions of MAMK & Kurbaan. For the former, "Kapoor featured as Raina Khanna, a woman who becomes the sole breadwinner of the family, which brings to a rift in her marriage." - I don't know why but when I read this sentence the prose doesn't flow properly. As for the latter, I changed ONLY the beginning of the paragraph and the rest I left it the way as you edited. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 02:23, 30 June 2010 (UTC)