User talk:Sharifshakurbey

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sharifshakurbey, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 11:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Morocco–United States relations. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Irn (talk) 10:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as though you've been doing this all morning as User:2602:306:363F:28D0:2C37:53EC:E737:D4DD. You really must stop. Doug Weller talk 11:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

It appears that you have a conflict of interest. Please read and follow our guideline. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Your edit here to General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://gcmea.weebly.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America[edit]

The article General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unreferenced, either hoax or fraud; this clearly is not the consulate of the internationally recognized Moroccan state

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sharif Kasambu El Shakur Bey[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sharif Kasambu El Shakur Bey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:1C34:C732:DFBD:EFE2 (talk) 01:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 20:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User:Lemongirl942‎. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. You are neither supposed to accuse other users of racism when they are merely deleted unsourced content (which is a perfectly fine thing to do), nor to edit a user's own user page while doing so. Please refrain in the future. LjL (talk) 20:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prove what is unsourced please Sharifshakurbey (talk) 20:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GCMEA-General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GCMEA-General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☕ Antiqueight ^haver 22:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message on my talk page[edit]

You wrote on the talk page "This organization is registered and copyrighted." Maybe, but that is not enough. The test for inclusion in Wikipedia is called Wikipedia:Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Youtube, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary).

Also, since you are connected with the organization, you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and should not be writing about it directly. Read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Wikipedia is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves. At most, you may use Wikipedia:Articles for creation to submit a draft for review by an uninvolved user; but unless you can show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, you will be wasting your time. JohnCD (talk) 22:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Josve05a. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User:JohnCD— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:JohnCD, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ☕ Antiqueight ^haver 22:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sharifshakurbey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Abuse of editors" is about the only part of the unblock request that's relevant, but I don't see that you acknowledge your conduct was wrong. Insulting editors you disagree with simply is not acceptable. Huon (talk) 23:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion of "GCMEA-General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America"[edit]

GCMEA-General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a recreation of content previously deleted following a deletion discussion.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 23:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to GCMEA-General Consulate of Moroccan Empire in America has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs 00:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. The material appears to be substantially taken from: http://www.mountvernon.org/digital-encyclopedia/article/morocco. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 09:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the real reason the article was deleted. If you wish to re-create it, you cannot directly copy material from other sources without having a license to do so. Thank you. Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs 10:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]