User talk:SeanMorleyRoxs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability of Eve Torres[edit]

A tag has been placed on Eve Torres requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Oysterguitarist 04:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page is notable because she is a Diva Search contestant working for WWE(World Wrestling Entertainment) at this time so i think that would make it notable.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 06:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok since at the moment everyone seems to be determined 4 there not 2 be a Eve Torres page, my question is if Eve wins the WWE Diva Search on October 29th will that finally make her notable enough for someone to add a page about her.

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the World Wrestling Entertainment roster page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sandahl 05:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced the warning sorry.--Sandahl 05:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 05:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Re:How do i add pictures??. This link will help with that Wikipedia:Picture tutorial. Images should go on the right at the top of the page above the text. If there's more than one in the article that can vary. Here is a link that shows image copyright tags so that you can find the right one. Happy editing.--Sandahl 07:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Greetings...

Hello, SeanMorleyRoxs, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the green welcome.
I hope you like it here and decide to stay!
Happy editing! Sandahl 22:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sandahl 22:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lee Donoghue, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://imdb.com/name/nm1047838. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with your articles[edit]

Hello, SeanMorleyRoxs ... the main problem with the biographical articles you are creating is that they do not contain any references to reliable source publications about the subjects ... IMDb listings and blogs do not meet the criteria ... see this example of a stub that demonstrates correctly asserting and citing notability, e.g., your articles lack such basic information as Date of birth and Place of birth (hence the Category tags) ... Happy Editing! —141.156.234.101 (talk) 23:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What they mean by Notability[edit]

Hey Sean thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I enjoyed some of the articles you contributed to. If you want your articles to remain on Wikipedia without being deleted all the time you need to explain in the article why your article is important. That is what is meant by Notability. So for instance, if you are writing an article about a character from Home and Away, before you start writing about the character, you should write a paragraph saying that this character is on the show Home And Away and that Home and Away is a very important television show because it has been running for a very long time and has been very popular on Australian TV. You need to write as if you are trying to convince people from Russia how important this character is in Australia. Hope this helps. Leave a msg on my talk page if you have a question Ryan Albrey (talk) 10:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, Ryan's statement above isn't correct as notability is not inherited: the fact that a character is in Home and Away (which is notable) does not mean that all characters in Home and Away are notable. For any subject to be notable, it must itself be the subject of third-party commentary. Cheers --Pak21 (talk) 10:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am not trying to suggest that notability is inherited. I am merely trying to explain to SeanMorleyRoxs how he or she can give his or her articles a better chance of survival in this cutthroat world of deletionists ready to discard anything that doesn't fit their personal view of what belongs in an Encyclopedia. That is after all the reason why all these articles are being deleted right? Because the case for notability has not been sufficiently made? Perhaps I should add to my prior message that not only must SeanMorleyRoxs explain that Home and Away is a notable TV show but also that a particular character, for example Morag Bellingham, is a notable character that exists within a notable work of fiction. Ryan Albrey (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please see Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) for the notability guidelines that pertain to the articles under discussion, and consider joining WikiProject Soap Operas for help in finding resources ... Happy Editing! —72.75.89.38 (talk · contribs) 11:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberley Crossman edits[edit]

Great work you've been doing to the Kimberley Crossman article. However instead of saving every small change you make, you may consider using one of the sandboxes that are available before you commit your edits to the main page.

Cheers and Happy editing.

--  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 12:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consider joining WP:PW[edit]

You have recently created a few professional wrestling related articles, however, according to the guidlines we have at WP:PW, the articles you are creating are not notable enough to be on Wikipedia. Would you consider joining WP:PW project? Cheers, Davnel03 20:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just want to notifice to you that hangon is only used for speedy deletion not for article for deletion. If you want to contest the nomination, you should participate in the discussion opened on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastacia Rose. Cheers. Carlosguitar (ready and willing) 09:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Burying Brian[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Burying Brian, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Burying Brian. Kannie | talk 23:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Burying Brian, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This is an article about a TV series still in production (WP:CRYSTAL), with insufficient WP:RS coverage to establish WP:FICTION notability ... a seconded WP:PROD was removed by the author without comment.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 72.75.72.63 (talk) 01:31, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

friendly advice[edit]

You've been devoting a great deal of effort to writing articles for Wikipedia, and I'd like to suggest how you might do it more effectively; surely you want what to write to stay here, and provide readers the information about things that are important to you and to them. Perhaps It might be most useful if you tried to write a very few really substantial articles, with really good documentation. There is no point in writing articles about people that clearly do not meet the guidelines. Basically what is needed for a performer is some substantial independent reviews in reliable 3rd party sources--not blogs, not IMdB. You can use IMdB for the basic facts of a career, but not as evidence of importance. There is no point in writing articles without the necessary documentation at hand--if you can not find material that meats the conventional Wikipedia practices of reliable sources, there's no way the article will be accepted. In practice, it's good to make the sources that support notability evident from the very first version--there are many people here who will try to delete any incomplete article, and often succeed in doing so--there is no way to cope with this except to work around them and make sure it will hold up from the beginning. Holdup, that is, according to our conventions--you may find them limiting--you may find our standards for inclusion too restrictive--but at this point there's really nothing to do but to follow them. Later on, you may want to see if others agree with you about changing them. What it takes to be a good writer here or anywhere is patience. What it takes to getting the material published, is following whatever are the conventions where you want to publish it. I find--thousands of people here have found--that it's worth the trouble. 04:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Removing comments[edit]

Hello, SeanMorleyRoxs ... Please see Removal of comments, warnings, and note that deleting warnings from your user talk page does not make them go away ... older versions, like this one, will always be available for anyone to see, so you cannot hide all of those articles you created that have subsequently been deleted for lack of Notability. —72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) 05:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shortland Street Wikia[edit]

I would like to invite you to help create the Shortland Street Wikia, a Wikia all about Shortland Street and its characters, actors, locations, storylines et cetera.
Thanks
Adabow (talk) 04:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aden Jefferies[edit]

Please do not remove tags from articles that have been nominated for deletion. Please make your case for keeping the article on the relevant talk page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Harris. Dreamspy (talk) 09:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Aden Jefferies, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://seven.com.au/homeandaway/meetthecast_aden_jefferies. As a copyright violation, Aden Jefferies appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Aden Jefferies has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Aden Jefferies and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Aden Jefferies with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Aden Jefferies.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Dreamspy (talk) 13:05, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the copyright problem, i had no idea that is was a copy of http://seven.com.au/homeandaway/meetthecast_aden_jefferies i haven't done any editing for this page since i first started the page in late 2007 i'll fix the problem as soon as i have time.

Speedy deletion of Aden Jefferies(Character)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aden Jefferies(Character), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Printer222 (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Cryme Tyme Cenation[edit]

I have nominated Cryme Tyme Cenation, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryme Tyme Cenation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- iMatthew T.C. 10:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Chloe Cammeniti, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Cammeniti. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jack Merridew 10:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


AfD nomination of Stella Banderas[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Stella Banderas, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stella Banderas. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ckessler (talk) 20:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Stella Banderas[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Stella Banderas. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stella Banderas. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Willow Smith[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Willow Smith. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willow Smith. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The article Hannah Robinson‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logical Fuzz (talk) 03:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Home and Away children has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A list non notable infant fictional character's from Home and Away, no reliable sources, no linking to page, whole page is written in the in-universe perspective. Characters already mentioned in one of FIVE character lists for this named programme.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RAIN the ONE (Talk) 23:56, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Home and Away children for deletion[edit]

The article List of Home and Away children is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Home and Away children until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 00:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]